Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: base: cacheinfo: support DT overrides for cache
 type
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
References: <1510837089-5951-1-git-send-email-tanxiaojun@huawei.com>
 <ce8466bc-86c9-8538-b144-1fa3ee4cbf38@arm.com>
CC:     <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
From:   Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <5A0E45D3.1090803@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:13:39 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ce8466bc-86c9-8538-b144-1fa3ee4cbf38@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2017/11/16 23:23, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 16/11/17 12:58, Tan Xiaojun wrote:
>> Since commit dfea747d2aba ("drivers: base: cacheinfo: support DT
>> overrides for cache properties"), we can set the correct cacheinfo
>> via DT. But the cache type can't be set in the same way.
>>
>> I found this may be a problem in recent tests. I tested L3 cache
>> node setting in DT in Hisilicon D03/D05 board. And I got cacheinfo
>> via sysfs below:
> 
> I assume L3 is outer non-architected system cache.
> 

Yes.

>>
>> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cache/index3/
>> allocation_policy      level                  power/
>> shared_cpu_map         uevent                 write_policy
>> coherency_line_size    number_of_sets         shared_cpu_list
>> size                   ways_of_associativity
>>
>> This is incomplete, no type file to display type info. Because L3
>> cache is uncore, we can't get correct type info from system
>> register, and will get a default type "CACHE_TYPE_NOCACHE". Then
>> use "lscpu" will print an error like below:
>>
>> $ lscpu
>> lscpu: cannot open /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache/index3/type:
>> No such file or directory
>>
>> So I think maybe we can set correct cache type via DT too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
>> index eb3af27..3e650dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
>> @@ -122,6 +122,15 @@ static inline int get_cacheinfo_idx(enum cache_type type)
>>  	return type;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void cache_type(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf)
>> +{
>> +	const __be32 *cache_type;
>> +
>> +	cache_type = of_get_property(this_leaf->of_node, "type", NULL);
> 
> NACK for this:
> 
> 1. We don't have any DT binding for the "type"
> 2. Even if we had, we will never have such a binding that magical
>    returns the enum used in Linux implementation. That's not how DT
>    bindings are designed.
> 
> Please refer ePAPR or Devicetree Specification Release 0.1 from
> devicetree.org, we have cache-unified boolean for type.
> 
> Let me know if the below patch works for you, I will submit it
> preferably with your tested-by.
> 
> Regards,
> Sudeep
> 

OK. That's fine. I will test this.
By the way, Arm64 tend to use acpi way to boot now. Is there some
suitable solution for acpi?

Thanks.
Xiaojun.

> -->8
> 
> diff --git i/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c w/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> index eb3af2739537..07532d83be0b 100644
> --- i/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> +++ w/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> @@ -186,6 +186,11 @@ static void cache_associativity(struct cacheinfo
> *this_leaf)
>                 this_leaf->ways_of_associativity = (size / nr_sets) /
> line_size;
>  }
> 
> +static bool cache_node_is_unified(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf)
> +{
> +       return of_property_read_bool(this_leaf->of_node, "cache-unified");
> +}
> +
>  static void cache_of_override_properties(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>         int index;
> @@ -194,6 +199,14 @@ static void cache_of_override_properties(unsigned
> int cpu)
> 
>         for (index = 0; index < cache_leaves(cpu); index++) {
>                 this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
> +               /*
> +                * init_cache_level must setup the cache level correctly
> +                * overriding the architecturally specified levels, so
> +                * if type is NONE at this stage, it should be unified
> +                */
> +               if (this_leaf->type == CACHE_TYPE_NOCACHE &&
> +                   cache_node_is_unified(this_leaf))
> +                       this_leaf->type = CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED;
>                 cache_size(this_leaf);
>                 cache_get_line_size(this_leaf);
>                 cache_nr_sets(this_leaf);
> 
> 
> .
> 


From 1584242973727435612@xxx Thu Nov 16 17:03:54 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1584226221830067445
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread