Received: by 10.223.164.221 with SMTP id h29csp2289410wrb; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 04:54:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QGTOqEliYK5COtsQSU2kWmhrEs3mAAwmK5h0281Ox54URVkUSD8soUmnEufsYCzuheNbkj X-Received: by 10.99.152.68 with SMTP id l4mr11593036pgo.443.1508759695189; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 04:54:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1508759695; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ckTb4OTUNZi5ntSwaqRdm7bj4jtrKqOh19RihLwY3b9oZfRLY1N3bcqXp+JpV+PjRu tPU0tIFpkCxWoGRrAjgVTky2FUdR1PdOUU0KkJdbaxQfvK3HOuz2/mo3yiOOMZiGh/2C MnUnuWHdIdK4s4wq+AAeRQxoGQgvs3Rbbv7mr6Dh2ExDIdxVQXWd3NGL2pQTJy4AF+nB Qv8TqqndbriP806VZXNbTrmPmuYd9qP14mYEUbDQ1ALNnzHDnt1TyNUu0lcp0DZFQ/6I 2uXVI+haDXmZaHyLqxRlxspKtAJqNtczaNmi2NjMQbjk2xaOFfmJE4QVY0qpqybV1BXL FgBw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id:arc-authentication-results; bh=2rm5SFetgnjPbn/RHdmETlHw1zxPMXA8Q5wZ7PO1LLA=; b=tqQIVLgCTjbS+iNPoDzXknishpok0HWZCvTHYzNgoNTr7TK3e3j2jZ2A5Gn79Hl0Sp hcP+Jv3/chOY6ynyrTZQfxkXj//3iLOh8KepmuIPpGtQXr6nhQOXfCTll3d/N/KjBP0f SqCd+TJC+mOxIHbLix9Mb/3VZ6SmT+cOdjDyOBaiUBDk6laWnHqthhbULLS7JNK+HT7E aWkQTKpXpDBhmZ7Cy/wZv6xvVDOogiDl9UdF0UiuNx1O7GM4qulP1ITAZu+ocJu1v80R kjx8VGIpfneWfHaImgDn1ymgqfIaS3yDrE/MK9rLbrqraI7nXNKNpjO1vpxVyTR6sHZ3 f0tA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m124si4836777pgm.684.2017.10.23.04.54.41; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 04:54:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932191AbdJWLxE (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 07:53:04 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:53505 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932096AbdJWLxE (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 07:53:04 -0400 Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Oct 2017 04:53:03 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,422,1503385200"; d="scan'208";a="166393386" Received: from acox1-desk1.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.3.27]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2017 04:53:00 -0700 Message-ID: <1508759574.29460.4.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] soundwire: Add SoundWire bus type From: Alan Cox To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Vinod Koul Cc: Philippe Ombredanne , LKML , ALSA , Mark , Takashi , Pierre , Sanyog Kale , Shreyas NC , patches.audio@intel.com, Charles Keepax , Sagar Dharia , srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, plai@codeaurora.org, Sudheer Papothi Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:52:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20171020162723.GB6674@kroah.com> References: <1508382211-3154-1-git-send-email-vinod.koul@intel.com> <1508382211-3154-3-git-send-email-vinod.koul@intel.com> <20171020104528.GC3210@kroah.com> <20171020162042.GW30097@localhost> <20171020162723.GB6674@kroah.com> Organization: Intel Corporation Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 (3.22.6-2.fc25) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > I quick grep on Dual license users looks like we already have this > > in kernel > > code. See drivers/ntb/hw/intel/ntb_hw_intel.c > > Just because someone did something wrong in the past, doesn't mean > they > should keep doing more wrong things in the future :) What makes you think it's wrong ? It's the same approach the kernel has been using since back to Linux 1.2 and maybe earlier. I know it's not your intention but you are also going to look bad to the BSD and other communities if you try and break dual licensing as a standard Linux thing for some code. It goes back decades (Ted's random driver for example). Alan From 1582048747418876471@xxx Mon Oct 23 11:47:37 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1581653176013345351 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums