Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp995635wrb; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:19:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbTaTH9EbK4xc4Q6iIYTSaBu2vSLo/e8OPnX/ISMKgEaNner5NZ37IWShdOWIslHLy7XbFc X-Received: by 10.84.236.74 with SMTP id h10mr16455155pln.2.1510773547504; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:19:07 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1510773547; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=w8vokc6Y5ZkSQ9rZGxrS0Dzpu3j/yXPtMHOXii3N2a2jA0FDNrATgrsEmmyjmAJ643 SbLiSi2S6Gu/80DJd2Rp3EKmQG1k8drEbqbL1oDZCa6bZBaEZ09TmWIu7RX1y6niZkrh LRebuvXJ81SJq8jLWbFghgP7av7c1HfFb9cbMy0dstPrQLPgQRy86MR9hpX7hRdjoMq1 i/6xeFXfwwmSH4TrYa5HJQimHTM+rDOBKO0lrqD40+vJM1QxGXb+0sGttpO4DFdGHuSI zm9Qb0EX9gkgOv6oufrSEMZJXBriDPRS/JtMsBcmcuA84QDZ8YpR7lpPrsZtBFO7Emam xh2g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:mime-version:user-agent :message-id:in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=QKSMGloCB4R9r+xwE3i4SZe4Vd3dOVCBvBg3VB5T5f0=; b=H7lG9jpgVQJEyxPY6KJdoqGtxMUdH+CSea5MQ28vad8oO9iUxpnmAtetwZ6VisO2/z Y9zemUImVJLC3aNULfo7vkDWVb8R2xQ/E4JV4fHLwP2orPl4tCZqMcItBpdfI0cogNve q7e2Aqpruzgj+EBGXTNtfSQNXcwioHWhjlRRhgU6G6EG33VIrfU/3KglOnfmRC3gENvG gsgf1hcWd+udxqDAjXREDn6AbjZLOh1BENJ9UcRkxMLV5fKH7zrcRCcaaqvYCN3hSIbt MeE/83sPesnuy1bY0K6qjqn41w8KaFW1lPqnC7LnaQTLg9KFhgoCc02A6u4NZqiAVrcd U7uQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m11si951585pln.195.2017.11.15.11.18.55; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:19:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758923AbdKOQhe (ORCPT + 90 others); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:37:34 -0500 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:51892 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757097AbdKOQhZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:37:25 -0500 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1eF0gj-00069F-5C; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:37:21 -0700 Received: from 75-170-119-32.omah.qwest.net ([75.170.119.32] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1eF0gd-0001Og-30; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:37:20 -0700 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Elena Reshetova Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, lizefan@huawei.com, acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, eparis@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, luto@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, tglx@linutronix.de, dvhart@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, axboe@kernel.dk References: <1510754620-27088-1-git-send-email-elena.reshetova@intel.com> <1510754620-27088-13-git-send-email-elena.reshetova@intel.com> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:36:52 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1510754620-27088-13-git-send-email-elena.reshetova@intel.com> (Elena Reshetova's message of "Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:03:36 +0200") Message-ID: <87lgj733dn.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1eF0gd-0001Og-30;;;mid=<87lgj733dn.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=75.170.119.32;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1800OPSOHFxOndARl6mWXnzFAVddAr0Eas= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 75.170.119.32 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on sa01.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,TVD_RCVD_IP,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01, T_TooManySym_02,XMNoVowels,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_02 5+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;Elena Reshetova X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 5648 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.06 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.1 (0.1%), b_tie_ro: 2.1 (0.0%), parse: 1.46 (0.0%), extract_message_metadata: 115 (2.0%), get_uri_detail_list: 5 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 32 (0.6%), tests_pri_-950: 1.96 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 2.5 (0.0%), tests_pri_-400: 80 (1.4%), check_bayes: 78 (1.4%), b_tokenize: 31 (0.5%), b_tok_get_all: 22 (0.4%), b_comp_prob: 6 (0.1%), b_tok_touch_all: 3.6 (0.1%), b_finish: 0.81 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 2060 (36.5%), check_dkim_signature: 1.65 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 22 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 3345 (59.2%), poll_dns_idle: 3336 (59.1%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] nsproxy: convert nsproxy.count to refcount_t X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The middle of the merge window is the wrong time to send patches as maintaner attention is going to making certain the merge goes smoothly and nothing is missed. Eric Elena Reshetova writes: > atomic_t variables are currently used to implement reference > counters with the following properties: > - counter is initialized to 1 using atomic_set() > - a resource is freed upon counter reaching zero > - once counter reaches zero, its further > increments aren't allowed > - counter schema uses basic atomic operations > (set, inc, inc_not_zero, dec_and_test, etc.) > > Such atomic variables should be converted to a newly provided > refcount_t type and API that prevents accidental counter overflows > and underflows. This is important since overflows and underflows > can lead to use-after-free situation and be exploitable. > > The variable nsproxy.count is used as pure reference counter. > Convert it to refcount_t and fix up the operations. > > **Important note for maintainers: > > Some functions from refcount_t API defined in lib/refcount.c > have different memory ordering guarantees than their atomic > counterparts. > The full comparison can be seen in > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/15/57 and it is hopefully soon > in state to be merged to the documentation tree. > Normally the differences should not matter since refcount_t provides > enough guarantees to satisfy the refcounting use cases, but in > some rare cases it might matter. > Please double check that you don't have some undocumented > memory guarantees for this variable usage. > > For the nsproxy.count it might make a difference > in following places: > - put_nsproxy() and switch_task_namespaces(): decrement in > refcount_dec_and_test() only provides RELEASE ordering > and control dependency on success vs. fully ordered > atomic counterpart > > Suggested-by: Kees Cook > Reviewed-by: David Windsor > Reviewed-by: Hans Liljestrand > Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova > --- > include/linux/nsproxy.h | 6 +++--- > kernel/nsproxy.c | 6 +++--- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/nsproxy.h b/include/linux/nsproxy.h > index 2ae1b1a..90f09ff 100644 > --- a/include/linux/nsproxy.h > +++ b/include/linux/nsproxy.h > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ struct fs_struct; > * nsproxy is copied. > */ > struct nsproxy { > - atomic_t count; > + refcount_t count; > struct uts_namespace *uts_ns; > struct ipc_namespace *ipc_ns; > struct mnt_namespace *mnt_ns; > @@ -75,14 +75,14 @@ int __init nsproxy_cache_init(void); > > static inline void put_nsproxy(struct nsproxy *ns) > { > - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ns->count)) { > + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&ns->count)) { > free_nsproxy(ns); > } > } > > static inline void get_nsproxy(struct nsproxy *ns) > { > - atomic_inc(&ns->count); > + refcount_inc(&ns->count); > } > > #endif > diff --git a/kernel/nsproxy.c b/kernel/nsproxy.c > index f6c5d33..5bfe691 100644 > --- a/kernel/nsproxy.c > +++ b/kernel/nsproxy.c > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ > static struct kmem_cache *nsproxy_cachep; > > struct nsproxy init_nsproxy = { > - .count = ATOMIC_INIT(1), > + .count = REFCOUNT_INIT(1), > .uts_ns = &init_uts_ns, > #if defined(CONFIG_POSIX_MQUEUE) || defined(CONFIG_SYSVIPC) > .ipc_ns = &init_ipc_ns, > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static inline struct nsproxy *create_nsproxy(void) > > nsproxy = kmem_cache_alloc(nsproxy_cachep, GFP_KERNEL); > if (nsproxy) > - atomic_set(&nsproxy->count, 1); > + refcount_set(&nsproxy->count, 1); > return nsproxy; > } > > @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ void switch_task_namespaces(struct task_struct *p, struct nsproxy *new) > p->nsproxy = new; > task_unlock(p); > > - if (ns && atomic_dec_and_test(&ns->count)) > + if (ns && refcount_dec_and_test(&ns->count)) > free_nsproxy(ns); > } From 1584391591518585438@xxx Sat Nov 18 08:26:07 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1584391591518585438 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread