Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756061AbYANKxd (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:53:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754296AbYANKxX (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:53:23 -0500 Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:1449 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751958AbYANKxW (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:53:22 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:53:07 +1100 From: Herbert Xu To: Ilpo =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?= Cc: "Zhang, Yanmin" , LKML , Netdev Subject: Re: Netperf TCP_RR(loopback) 10% regression in 2.6.24-rc6, comparing with 2.6.22 Message-ID: <20080114105307.GA22866@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <1199871330.3298.132.camel@ymzhang> <1200043854.3265.24.camel@ymzhang> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 796 Lines: 20 On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:44:40AM +0000, Ilpo J?rvinen wrote: > > > > I tried to use bisect to locate the bad patch between 2.6.22 and 2.6.23-rc1, > > > but the bisected kernel wasn't stable and went crazy. > > TCP work between that is very much non-existing. Make sure you haven't switched between SLAB/SLUB while testing this. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/