Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:04:20 +0100
Message-ID: <s5h8x2sllcb.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@enter.net>
Cc: Harald Dunkel <harald.dunkel@t-online.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc7, intel audio: alsa doesn't say a beep
In-Reply-To: <200801121211.22280.dhazelton@enter.net>
References: <4782833D.3010600@t-online.de>
	<s5hprw8g8m7.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
	<47888B41.70803@t-online.de>
	<200801121211.22280.dhazelton@enter.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka)
 FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.5 (beta28)
 (fuki) (+CVS-20070806) (i386-suse-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1649
Lines: 50

At Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:11:20 -0500,
Daniel Hazelton wrote:
> 
> On Saturday 12 January 2008 04:41:21 Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:02:53 +0100,
> > >
> > > Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > >> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > >>> Hm...  Just to be sure, try the patch below.  It's a clean up patch
> > >>> that I'd like to apply later.
> > >>
> > >> Sorry, no sound.
> > >
> > > OK, but I'd like to know whether this makes no regression to rc6.
> > > Could you check?
> > >
> > > Also, what exactly did you test?  "No sound" means that no sound from
> > > the headphone / line-out or from the speaker?
> > >
> > > One interesting test would be to increase the value of udelay() in the
> > > reverted patch.  What happens if it's set to 500?
> >
> > There is no udelay() in the reverted patch. If I replace "udelay(10)"
> > by "udelay(500)" in the original rc7, then there is still no sound.
> >
> > This is like fishing in the dark. We've got a working version. Why not
> > keep it?
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Harri
> 
> Could this have anything to do with the following messages I've seen when 
> trying -rc7 ?
> 
> [    7.760269] pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of mem resources: 12

Judging from Harald's report, it looks like a different problem.
The buggy patch (regarding HDA-intel) was, at least, already reverted
on Linus git tree.  Could you give it a try?


Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/