Received: by 10.223.164.197 with SMTP id h5csp330476wrb; Sat, 4 Nov 2017 11:56:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+ToRzpWpBbbfcjVadM/4pAO8rfI4aTnoBGfXExQWXebUCYU6zSwVIlkTuIc51rJnlzOuGEE X-Received: by 10.98.80.69 with SMTP id e66mr11695356pfb.112.1509821771806; Sat, 04 Nov 2017 11:56:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1509821771; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=t/qZyPerQ1DGoqhD6cAncEnodsEfk0B8QhmEFgyZYhJ4VcS9XdU1ue/k7vZiltKCfL Dlr2M2hbLvSDu4cx/rmhZMm6lD6bjzQzg3aePPGxdU3OL6XB5ZlhO+QkCfUjxOzLQ+A+ ciMU8B8Y/So5qGnlsjnq03Y6hP6NpyCtt0xLzRlMrFtOpttv6qVIqfrtp0dwqRkdhzPl DtVZTExbsnLyV70aZ+K47tgtgW2yYyDDS+33+SlfoyrhrfEyVvIETxS9pkumNs6oW3tE TZ2wOw7oh6O+jXvCxE5xSEde5SedHHK9DLgnDhMvi2u+zeU1BRXDkHV2XXRfiM1y6MwX uu6w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=3aaLIsH3Vwzwt7SZNHYzLzquXDcpl/Z96FJ3YOFerZQ=; b=K9Iw9mRf+bxeyX396+t8PCqUHGSKyYdR8HFGKL1qiFzYQ54GaaTe2Xt9g31QqNdDBo nmDKz5PA8OpCp5kOwSACUBOAKMCKMnxUFIF6ycnIlAS/evLVA4CcNuGK3qNnXJokpYNB L7jf65Nopfe6ei6KnwERMLMGFhByOcVWUB35UJ6zaC9lxCPWghkhKguXIVUnyVWqIXSb avAQzM3+o+opYznMWAHvhSZyruPrOGiEGRi8dT8b2tLJS3lVZ+N+HEbatKEf86GhRXQa gSSYO8I+jJQBJFaa0Myr36U66ChAOG9ftWLOw3cXqv1TdE952V+gYp7i97/tOp+GbZLe WmHg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=RA+8WGaB; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r8si8664167pgq.305.2017.11.04.11.55.58; Sat, 04 Nov 2017 11:56:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=RA+8WGaB; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751618AbdKDSyQ (ORCPT + 93 others); Sat, 4 Nov 2017 14:54:16 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f68.google.com ([209.85.218.68]:55153 "EHLO mail-oi0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750709AbdKDSyO (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Nov 2017 14:54:14 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f68.google.com with SMTP id a132so4378780oih.11 for ; Sat, 04 Nov 2017 11:54:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3aaLIsH3Vwzwt7SZNHYzLzquXDcpl/Z96FJ3YOFerZQ=; b=RA+8WGaB70RbdXjrxpbA9kvfy15cNZtjHrH544BAVNJRW50v+6PGbjZ75cBbJ9pS83 kDB0HvnhNzhaGM9R2ewChXfHnVzAZnNyv5OxaKLN1zjMzQtsc7c5DyCpI3dtzFoztt/b IfS4M6U4xRhxLJGPYO2hA8fnM0d2Q9JsZD17B+SlQyxTXDmBxl3Quw/16xMCJtvHCUxD MYsqtUGGltlTkx0l/QsE/7Vr2ALSlzx3FDqlKfumld/1a2OM9DN6qHc5XJWWAfOqEGo6 s8vb4jTJHUTv/9VVQR1UYbbnOPUotONtu+YZNiTD7eancDLl0oQdi5EePKx1qLeIOWX1 DN1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3aaLIsH3Vwzwt7SZNHYzLzquXDcpl/Z96FJ3YOFerZQ=; b=dCA2Ro6npomxMDafELoIHHm8R/5L2wOhzlQyMUBIzO9rH/aZyjC74BI0eyTDqeg/F7 k0odMeHnFl2byV3aOt/V4gZ3qnbVxIjmovNM9QvSLqCRiP1s5o3rxbcNwoARPraxRD2f x6e3pvRAA+P34wfyqer+c8s336iCgMepToEo7f7HXYqk+au64IOVJUXrTvBnYY8w2Ix5 U6iPbmZ/DeBVrZ6b9BKELDH6G3VOqU8z5kKSNBsNSX+3oYwdhkWfbnU88j3sNg9HXU8V Hd647XuHWNEblgoX50CL596ALEuhjs7u0Cs5QUrpv/lsIYWL1ec8MnTEkVHIGc5KSaPy DnkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaU3eBW8P+S2PmmkFRK0yaQt3Zhit8SbUiwLGsyNuuuDuyXfuH3i 8j6EamSap6Kl9zcosT9xa9o/mfXDk3h2AayaK3SmkA== X-Received: by 10.202.78.216 with SMTP id c207mr6365321oib.242.1509821653477; Sat, 04 Nov 2017 11:54:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.74.168.131 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Nov 2017 11:53:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20171102110044.GE14475@kuha.fi.intel.com> References: <20171018202248.8278-1-Badhri@google.com> <20171018202248.8278-2-Badhri@google.com> <20171102110044.GE14475@kuha.fi.intel.com> From: Badhri Jagan Sridharan Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 11:53:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] typec: tcpm: Only request matching pdos To: Heikki Krogerus Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , USB , Dan Carpenter , Guenter Roeck , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:00 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > Hi, > > +Dan and Guenter > > I'm sorry for the late reply. These slipped under my radar. I do > have a one more proposal below, and a few nits.. > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 01:22:48PM -0700, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote: >> At present, TCPM code assumes that local device supports >> variable/batt pdos and always selects the pdo with highest >> possible power within the board limit. This assumption >> might not hold good for all devices. To overcome this, >> this patch makes TCPM only accept a source_pdo when there is >> a matching sink pdo. >> >> For Fixed pdos: The voltage should match between the >> incoming source_cap and the registered snk_pdo >> For Variable/Batt pdos: The incoming source_cap voltage >> range should fall within the registered snk_pdo's voltage >> range. >> >> Also, when the cap_mismatch bit is set, the max_power/current >> should be set to the max_current/power of the sink_pdo. >> This is according to: >> >> "If the Capability Mismatch bit is set to one >> The Maximum Operating Current/Power field may contain a value >> larger than the maximum current/power offered in the Source >> Capabilities message???s PDO as referenced by the Object position field. >> This enables the Sink to indicate that it requires more current/power >> than is being offered. If the Sink requires a different voltage this >> will be indicated by its Sink Capabilities message. >> >> Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridharan >> --- >> Changelog since v1: >> - Rebased the patch on top of drivers/usb/type/tcpm.c >> - Added duplicate pdo check for variable/batt pdo. >> - Fixed tabs as suggested by dan.carpenter@oracle.com >> >> Changelog since v2: >> - Rebase >> >> drivers/usb/typec/tcpm.c | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >> 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm.c >> index e3f8b3da46b0..1b37333dc63b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm.c >> @@ -261,6 +261,9 @@ struct tcpm_port { >> unsigned int nr_src_pdo; >> u32 snk_pdo[PDO_MAX_OBJECTS]; >> unsigned int nr_snk_pdo; >> + unsigned int nr_fixed; /* number of fixed sink PDOs */ >> + unsigned int nr_var; /* number of variable sink PDOs */ >> + unsigned int nr_batt; /* number of battery sink PDOs */ >> u32 snk_vdo[VDO_MAX_OBJECTS]; >> unsigned int nr_snk_vdo; >> >> @@ -1762,39 +1765,92 @@ static int tcpm_pd_check_request(struct tcpm_port *port) >> return 0; >> } >> >> -static int tcpm_pd_select_pdo(struct tcpm_port *port) >> +static void tcpm_pd_evaluate_pdo(struct tcpm_port *port, int src_pdo_index, >> + int snk_pdo_index, int *max_mw, int *max_mv, >> + int *selected_src_pdo, >> + int *matching_snk_pdo) >> { >> - unsigned int i, max_mw = 0, max_mv = 0; >> + unsigned int mv = 0, ma = 0, mw = 0; >> + u32 src_pdo = port->source_caps[src_pdo_index]; >> + u32 snk_pdo = port->snk_pdo[snk_pdo_index]; >> + enum pd_pdo_type type = pdo_type(src_pdo); >> + >> + mv = (type == PDO_TYPE_FIXED) ? pdo_fixed_voltage(src_pdo) : >> + pdo_min_voltage(src_pdo); >> + >> + if (type == PDO_TYPE_BATT) { >> + mw = min(pdo_max_power(src_pdo), pdo_max_power(snk_pdo)); >> + } else { >> + ma = min(pdo_max_current(src_pdo), pdo_max_current(snk_pdo)); >> + mw = ma * mv / 1000; >> + } >> + >> + /* Perfer higher voltages if available */ >> + if (mw > *max_mw || (mw == *max_mw && mv > *max_mv)) { >> + *selected_src_pdo = src_pdo_index; >> + *matching_snk_pdo = snk_pdo_index; >> + *max_mw = mw; >> + *max_mv = mv; >> + } >> +} >> + >> +static int tcpm_pd_select_pdo(struct tcpm_port *port, int *sink_pdo) >> +{ >> + unsigned int i, j, max_mw = 0, max_mv = 0; >> int ret = -EINVAL; >> >> /* >> - * Select the source PDO providing the most power while staying within >> - * the board's voltage limits. Prefer PDO providing exp >> + * Select the source PDO providing the most power which has a >> + * matchig sink cap. >> */ >> for (i = 0; i < port->nr_source_caps; i++) { >> u32 pdo = port->source_caps[i]; >> enum pd_pdo_type type = pdo_type(pdo); >> - unsigned int mv, ma, mw; >> - >> - if (type == PDO_TYPE_FIXED) >> - mv = pdo_fixed_voltage(pdo); >> - else >> - mv = pdo_min_voltage(pdo); >> - >> - if (type == PDO_TYPE_BATT) { >> - mw = pdo_max_power(pdo); >> - } else { >> - ma = min(pdo_max_current(pdo), >> - port->max_snk_ma); >> - mw = ma * mv / 1000; >> - } >> >> - /* Perfer higher voltages if available */ >> - if ((mw > max_mw || (mw == max_mw && mv > max_mv)) && >> - mv <= port->max_snk_mv) { >> - ret = i; >> - max_mw = mw; >> - max_mv = mv; >> + if (type == PDO_TYPE_FIXED) { >> + for (j = 0; j < port->nr_fixed; j++) { >> + if (pdo_fixed_voltage(pdo) == >> + pdo_fixed_voltage(port->snk_pdo[j])) { >> + tcpm_pd_evaluate_pdo(port, i, j, >> + &max_mw, &max_mv, >> + &ret, sink_pdo); >> + /* There could only be one fixed pdo >> + * at a specific voltage level. >> + * So breaking here. >> + */ >> + break; >> + } >> + } >> + } else if (type == PDO_TYPE_BATT) { >> + for (j = port->nr_fixed; >> + j < port->nr_fixed + >> + port->nr_batt; >> + j++) { >> + if (pdo_min_voltage(pdo) >= >> + pdo_min_voltage(port->snk_pdo[j]) && >> + pdo_max_voltage(pdo) <= >> + pdo_max_voltage(port->snk_pdo[j])) { >> + tcpm_pd_evaluate_pdo(port, i, j, >> + &max_mw, &max_mv, >> + &ret, sink_pdo); >> + } >> + } >> + } else if (type == PDO_TYPE_VAR) { >> + for (j = port->nr_fixed + >> + port->nr_batt; >> + j < port->nr_fixed + >> + port->nr_batt + >> + port->nr_var; >> + j++) { >> + if (pdo_min_voltage(pdo) >= >> + pdo_min_voltage(port->snk_pdo[j]) && >> + pdo_max_voltage(pdo) <= >> + pdo_max_voltage(port->snk_pdo[j])) { >> + tcpm_pd_evaluate_pdo(port, i, j, >> + &max_mw, &max_mv, >> + &ret, sink_pdo); >> + } >> + } >> } > > Wouldn't it make sense to call tcpm_pd_evaluate_pdo() here ones and > run those nested loops there? You are already checking the type there > in any case. Combined into one function and introduced couple of macros to keep up with the character limit instead. Let me know your thoughts. > >> } >> >> @@ -1806,13 +1862,14 @@ static int tcpm_pd_build_request(struct tcpm_port *port, u32 *rdo) >> unsigned int mv, ma, mw, flags; >> unsigned int max_ma, max_mw; >> enum pd_pdo_type type; >> - int index; >> - u32 pdo; >> + int index, snk_pdo_index; >> + u32 pdo, matching_snk_pdo; >> >> - index = tcpm_pd_select_pdo(port); >> + index = tcpm_pd_select_pdo(port, &snk_pdo_index); >> if (index < 0) >> return -EINVAL; >> pdo = port->source_caps[index]; >> + matching_snk_pdo = port->snk_pdo[snk_pdo_index]; >> type = pdo_type(pdo); >> >> if (type == PDO_TYPE_FIXED) >> @@ -1820,26 +1877,32 @@ static int tcpm_pd_build_request(struct tcpm_port *port, u32 *rdo) >> else >> mv = pdo_min_voltage(pdo); >> >> - /* Select maximum available current within the board's power limit */ >> + /* Select maximum available current within the sink pdo's limit */ >> if (type == PDO_TYPE_BATT) { >> - mw = pdo_max_power(pdo); >> - ma = 1000 * min(mw, port->max_snk_mw) / mv; >> + mw = min(pdo_max_power(pdo), pdo_max_power(matching_snk_pdo)); >> + ma = 1000 * mw / mv; >> } else { >> ma = min(pdo_max_current(pdo), >> - 1000 * port->max_snk_mw / mv); >> + pdo_max_current(matching_snk_pdo)); >> + mw = ma * mv / 1000; >> } >> - ma = min(ma, port->max_snk_ma); >> >> flags = RDO_USB_COMM | RDO_NO_SUSPEND; >> >> /* Set mismatch bit if offered power is less than operating power */ >> - mw = ma * mv / 1000; >> max_ma = ma; >> max_mw = mw; >> if (mw < port->operating_snk_mw) { >> flags |= RDO_CAP_MISMATCH; >> - max_mw = port->operating_snk_mw; >> - max_ma = max_mw * 1000 / mv; >> + if (type == PDO_TYPE_BATT) { >> + if (pdo_max_power(matching_snk_pdo) > >> + pdo_max_power(pdo)) >> + max_mw = pdo_max_power(matching_snk_pdo); >> + } else { >> + if (pdo_max_current(matching_snk_pdo) > >> + pdo_max_current(pdo)) >> + max_ma = pdo_max_current(matching_snk_pdo); >> + } > > How about: > > if ((type == PDO_TYPE_BATT) && > (pdo_max_power(matching_snk_pdo) > pdo_max_power(pdo))) > max_mw = pdo_max_power(matching_snk_pdo); > else if (pdo_max_current(matching_snk_pdo) > pdo_max_current(pdo)) > max_ma = pdo_max_current(matching_snk_pdo); > > Though, that does not make it any more readable. Just a proposal. Sure. Will do in next patch. > >> } >> >> tcpm_log(port, "cc=%d cc1=%d cc2=%d vbus=%d vconn=%s polarity=%d", >> @@ -3588,6 +3651,19 @@ int tcpm_update_sink_capabilities(struct tcpm_port *port, const u32 *pdo, >> } >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcpm_update_sink_capabilities); >> >> +static int nr_type_pdos(const u32 *pdo, unsigned int nr_pdo, >> + enum pd_pdo_type type) > > Please align that properly. > >> +{ >> + int count = 0; >> + int i; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < nr_pdo; i++) { >> + if (pdo_type(pdo[i]) == type) >> + count++; >> + } >> + return count; >> +} >> + >> struct tcpm_port *tcpm_register_port(struct device *dev, struct tcpc_dev *tcpc) >> { >> struct tcpm_port *port; >> @@ -3633,6 +3709,15 @@ struct tcpm_port *tcpm_register_port(struct device *dev, struct tcpc_dev *tcpc) >> tcpc->config->nr_src_pdo); >> port->nr_snk_pdo = tcpm_copy_pdos(port->snk_pdo, tcpc->config->snk_pdo, >> tcpc->config->nr_snk_pdo); >> + port->nr_fixed = nr_type_pdos(port->snk_pdo, >> + port->nr_snk_pdo, >> + PDO_TYPE_FIXED); > > Ditto. > >> + port->nr_var = nr_type_pdos(port->snk_pdo, >> + port->nr_snk_pdo, >> + PDO_TYPE_VAR); > > Ditto. > >> + port->nr_batt = nr_type_pdos(port->snk_pdo, >> + port->nr_snk_pdo, >> + PDO_TYPE_BATT); > > Ditto. Will fix other styling issues as well. Thanks. > > > Thanks, > > -- > heikki From 1582951827353418097@xxx Thu Nov 02 11:01:41 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1581628275778143409 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread