Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp98377wrb; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:21:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZohYCqHIbHIf6hi9kNDP2VLzSoEXYVakStozdfQvlpdFeW4kbDI4VH36fDeastcOd2dmfF X-Received: by 10.159.252.198 with SMTP id o6mr10129546pls.390.1510611676046; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:21:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1510611676; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Q2xvZZlWva8852U8nW1ZepUe7oRzaljTrUfzVNguHsBFurjWJNdOEUAYtRodiCDsuQ e/sifufVg1GVUGD/eWwN5M8JbSaTFLwIrR3vY6uOxh8HXfitRlij/zAOeTdU9a86U2E/ z9amWCs3IKUNr+k3YIF7TLcXqCSp8j/bQYayFqiJQiP7oBmpdKQhPHJD6r3RScECt5o6 pAPiUqiAFXWealQFlrJOFTSil6feg08TzDSpa6fQTuBwTpPvadaUBQcJPszhDg1//FMu sdckqpjPSPY0DU37Lr3OLZCxSRKgpe6hsgeld9tqge7YXJvE9LZJJWu6HwhLkSkHRdpm FV2A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:cc:references:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=CdSC/RwXRY8O+yGhnCkre3AgzxWzkViIQyvWQCQfnXU=; b=ni4dt7v12HpagNv4PHCZoaEtOBZUcz2gX2vw0uuQiKhctXoJ/cr7mD4zBvAGd4A5mm K7p3kZKM/ZdQS2v9s8ZU9G5JtoW1wxaTe7PFM3zS1vjKS4G4P5bqpN8yswoaFQu+9Lvm rEeP4Kzemz0Hssv+kMM5bcls4QMNTCaOtWLbrWuDzJEcHyrLUVd3dMaGeGwJZQ6RfQ/y qmJgDYSCh4Psi3SEn/rOWyNENcLUlrVZFdhEDY0bXF3d1KnvPJ4KxcgcGg/AzZ4Q/+tF J/ccEwXFw/8CyTJNWuqQQ8RHJrufjsY+3W3niQhgD9YoyW+FIIXVAWz0oUyklvNWAnMh L76w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e8si16027784pfd.331.2017.11.13.14.21.02; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:21:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752201AbdKMWUV (ORCPT + 88 others); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:20:21 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:31497 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751174AbdKMWUU (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:20:20 -0500 Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Nov 2017 14:20:20 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,389,1505804400"; d="scan'208";a="173124524" Received: from ray.jf.intel.com (HELO [10.7.201.16]) ([10.7.201.16]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2017 14:20:19 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/11] mm, x86: Add support for eXclusive Page Frame Ownership (XPFO) To: Tycho Andersen References: <20170907173609.22696-1-tycho@docker.com> <20170907173609.22696-4-tycho@docker.com> <34454a32-72c2-c62e-546c-1837e05327e1@intel.com> <20170920223452.vam3egenc533rcta@smitten> <97475308-1f3d-ea91-5647-39231f3b40e5@intel.com> <20170921000901.v7zo4g5edhqqfabm@docker> <20171110010907.qfkqhrbtdkt5y3hy@smitten> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, Marco Benatto , Juerg Haefliger , x86@kernel.org From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: <7237ae6d-f8aa-085e-c144-9ed5583ec06b@intel.com> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:20:17 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171110010907.qfkqhrbtdkt5y3hy@smitten> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/09/2017 05:09 PM, Tycho Andersen wrote: > which I guess is from the additional flags in grow_dev_page() somewhere down > the stack. Anyway... it seems this is a kernel allocation that's using > MIGRATE_MOVABLE, so perhaps we need some more fine tuned heuristic than just > all MOVABLE allocations are un-mapped via xpfo, and all the others are mapped. > > Do you have any ideas? It still has to do a kmap() or kmap_atomic() to be able to access it. I thought you hooked into that. Why isn't that path getting hit for these? From 1583639383899400857@xxx Fri Nov 10 01:10:06 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1577903505730930323 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread