Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753884AbYANPwf (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:52:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751279AbYANPw2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:52:28 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:36185 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751035AbYANPw1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:52:27 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:52:05 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Alan Cox Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] serverworks: IRQ routing needs no _p Message-ID: <20080114155205.GB14177@elte.hu> References: <20080111181434.3dec6206@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080111181434.3dec6206@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 510 Lines: 15 * Alan Cox wrote: > I can find no reason for the _p on the serverworks IRQ routing logic, > and a review of the documentation contains no indication that any such > delay is needed so lets try this thanks, applied to x86.git. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/