Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2d10549b83f8b4990af60a61b44514b47da4c287.1509777293.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org>
References: <2d10549b83f8b4990af60a61b44514b47da4c287.1509777293.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org>
From:   Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 14 Nov 2017 20:58:18 +0800
Message-ID: <CAMz4kuKeqOH7m0zx7=rmaBOg5eekw3RZZwsREOJCC0sVotG40g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock: Change hwspinlock to a bool
To:     Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Bjorn,

On 4 November 2017 at 14:37, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> wrote:
> Change hwspinlock to a bool in case some drivers will meet dependency
> issue when hwspinlock is built as a module.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>

Could you apply this patch into K4.15 if there are no other comments? Thanks.

> ---
>  drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
> index 6e0a553..f0f4679 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>  #
>
>  menuconfig HWSPINLOCK
> -       tristate "Hardware Spinlock drivers"
> +       bool "Hardware Spinlock drivers"
>
>  config HWSPINLOCK_OMAP
>         tristate "OMAP Hardware Spinlock device"
> --
> 1.9.1
>


-- 
Baolin.wang
Best Regards

From 1583116622962429895@xxx Sat Nov 04 06:41:03 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1583116622962429895
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread