Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171113145304.GA17826@redhat.com>
References: <CAP045Ap9Xv67GaeskDt_gAajp1Cni_S0Z0u_vsuw_ptRUuJD6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20171102160705.GA11973@redhat.com> <20171103184144.GA21036@redhat.com> <20171113145304.GA17826@redhat.com>
From:   Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:00:11 -0800
Message-ID: <CAP045AqJ9Kp8u6Ri9ZTq3R4QLNcsLTXoX_T=AQ1K-WrftE7esA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE && SIGKILL interaction
To:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>, security@kernel.org,
        "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> ping...
>
> Dmitry confirms this actually fixes the problem reported by syzkaller
> we discussed in another thread.
>
>
> On 11/03, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>
>> On 11/02, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> >
>> > I need to write the changelog, and perhaps even split this small patch for
>> > better documentation.
>>
>> OK, it is not clear if I answered Eric's concerns or not, let me send the
>> patches for review anyway. I tried to document every change in signal.c.
>>
>> Oleg.
>>
>>  kernel/signal.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>

I can confirm that your patches fix the issue I reported as well.

- Kyle

From 1583963030517896681@xxx Mon Nov 13 14:54:20 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1583071423655295757
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread