Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
From:   Charlemagne Lasse <charlemagnelasse@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 11 Nov 2017 21:56:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFGhKbxxucnUgdw3Ot5gM5OXJ3tLVibiTK4o73kPbth7RhJmAg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Adding LICENSES folder for REUSE
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        carmenbianca@fsfe.org, Jonas Oberg <jonas@ffkp.se>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

the linux kernel is a GPL-2.0 project but is build based on files using
all kinds of different licenses. It would be really nice when these
licenses could be correctly referenced as described in the
https://reuse.software/practices/ from the FSF.

Since some people started to add the SPDX headers to some files, it
might now be the right time to ask to get a LICENSES folder which will
contain the separate licenses. According to the currently existing
SPDX-License-Identifier, this should be at least:

- GPL-1.0
- GPL-2.0
- BSD-2-Clause
- BSD-3-Clause
- MIT
- MPL-1.1
- LGPL-2.0
- LGPL-2.1

I personally don't understand why BSD-2-Clause or MIT needs to have the
copyright file stored with the copyright holder while GPL-2.0 doesn't
need that. Seems to be quite wasteful and useless in a project like the
Linux kernel. Especially when there are multiple copyright holders - and
there are different combination in each file. Maybe the FSFE can give us
some insights here.

Here just two example files:

- https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c?id=b39545684a90ef3374abc0969d64c7bc540d128d
- https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9580_1p0_initvals.h?id=b39545684a90ef3374abc0969d64c7bc540d128d

It would also be interesting to know from the FSFE how dual license
should be handled in by the License-Filename tag.


Thanks,
Charlemagne Lasse

From 1584337974742716434@xxx Fri Nov 17 18:13:55 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1584337974742716434
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread