Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp1276649wrb; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 03:44:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYXeoj7zu+4ks1Hb8XQUk4jwPb0qIBfAl2nL9Vjiect5yk9EWB+uHSWaeiz4WmsLbHuSxF1 X-Received: by 10.159.208.2 with SMTP id a2mr3473594plp.370.1510400690660; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 03:44:50 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1510400690; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=j/cFlatZ9wPQ1DdDGiEgoX9tAV+VhULbGEypqmMw4bTVsKXl+ONxLt99HFrED3kTe+ VTSRZVEeVK5rh2SmXKGHXq7hCtqv8g8Ftt7VQP7pt0ekwH36xD+uPLpPst6xwMhnfgp1 epWt5ugetRAnNQm9x2jq/4A3E6WijpqEI31pUhOp/oE9eu4t7N2qguuXSjlRw5/U3/5s uwXKisg1MqceXlHBM3t23iYl0PXVIqA6DDoT3w7n/mZlMAJraBECNV6MFiGXJSIUgXft DLllXFedixIEu5s2nER+ztrGIL+Aq9ZO0ih8s64EtCLTsjKA6E7RAQ6C3Y+wl0uHEDW1 7XAg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=csmN5AVICvcGzYr412a5vjzTjtPaiNLrjuaYV+Ln+xo=; b=FWeHrLpNN1vq1q331KriQPlO0S8+ZHmCfMt951eGp9tgGxerdmGRetIi2pKgnMiu39 tTNB42lV6/ziO6ic8Sk+2npohSmm0o38ttsWPq1IcKyNxQgK1QKL4k2LqugPE1H2usMM PfptJBXBfbeYnMpPnSSKEQciINxpZqQOPAU3z+WZyDGWd4X7LbNP9itlhqzAaeC3GCYR E2tVZnuv7Wg2S8E1M2DAWnaoEdBNXJZcZy3ABTcf5bO50HKmSDubCLF641s0B1DVpoP8 Mt7GeBVOk22WLdNdaD2kFaQicfffZM9pRpzDxEocpTDso0lra4VSEAcTEAJGoG44RnyD jTJg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s15si2862494pgc.789.2017.11.11.03.44.12; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 03:44:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751912AbdKKLm3 (ORCPT + 83 others); Sat, 11 Nov 2017 06:42:29 -0500 Received: from dd39320.kasserver.com ([85.13.155.146]:57540 "EHLO dd39320.kasserver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751564AbdKKLm2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Nov 2017 06:42:28 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.36] (109.125.99.188.dynamic.cablesurf.de [109.125.99.188]) by dd39320.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFB932CE05A9; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 12:42:26 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: staging: pi433: Possible bug in rf69.c To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Dan Carpenter , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <709d3e3f-be3b-aa98-1cf6-6a048ef14d7b@smarthome-wolf.de> <20171110193258.qv6dbokqpjrrq3yb@mwanda> <20171111084501.chwx5ku2senlgdza@mwanda> <2e82e800-618a-b332-41c8-ee8aa97da88b@smarthome-wolf.de> <20171111111819.GA14436@kroah.com> From: Marcus Wolf Message-ID: <5279c977-d62c-cbf4-a764-149ddc80e37a@smarthome-wolf.de> Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 13:42:27 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171111111819.GA14436@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, that's fine. Is this the right URL: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git Is there already an aprox. date, when 4.15rc1 will be out and backintegration will be done? Thx, Marcus Am 11.11.2017 um 13:18 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: > On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 11:42:09AM +0200, Marcus Wolf wrote: >> Hi Dan, >> >> thanks fot the link. I can't remeber, why and what I wanted to redo. Maybe >> there was a complaint about the format of the patch... >> >> In that patch, we also have the topic with the '>> 3', we were discussing a >> few days ago! >> >> I'd suggest, not to invest the history any more. I'm ok with preparing a new >> patch/new patches, so we can import the fixes. >> >> I also have several improvements for the rf69.c, I'd like to offer. >> >> But I still need to know when to use staging and when to use linux-next. >> I don't want to prepare patches for the wrong tree. > > I recommend waiting for 4.15-rc1 to come out, all of the different trees > will be merged, and then you can just work off of the staging-next tree > and I can take the patches. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > From 1583768287675955818@xxx Sat Nov 11 11:18:59 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1583700679179870250 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread