Received: by 10.223.164.221 with SMTP id h29csp4844898wrb; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 01:51:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RHIHZ4vsY5z8ZpIdUjXaMyYonPv1FyuF2MOl3cJ3JVP85T0jDPova6lIf0OW+AdSVxYurd X-Received: by 10.101.91.193 with SMTP id o1mr3752703pgr.75.1508489506968; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 01:51:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1508489506; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=i9P9XMSn1horJHekr5PXvnOEJU7SqKj+c/4ygrq3tPrEHMWLGXoKxc7xV7la6R2PB8 N+JrkX/OV6EvG2n3ualp+43NlWYTvWq/nYxgNVsGAgQpd/K49NdnF5ibgP7UE3xVF/Rp yRP+wD+bZJv+IJGAm6+8OIXhFYOUvEPuiT6TngPqznbprgJy1YTx3kM8/+tDJtzEyBPR EMJj4hv2WZw/5kzSmTNduhR2hTrv4tpOQUbu4dZTNQ0iJVJAnUygW8IQz4mpDoQ08Ly8 4LdUJWf1Yvm/9YtpbE4WusexEaN/Ci6v6ZEEcQexRkeTc1ERUQgeer4FJN4/oNgEsQoF MyWA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:mail-followup-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=YxuzjTAToHImr4ti6GLV8Nx299o6dQZPYvK51tJxf00=; b=e3T30VdkX1SfG+2SyX312Nh2BgRdeoSIQ7DX3Wa9MACrJfTn/sjTFES3o6HLalpt4a IH/NxXKDKwZ/+z1uEPAF3nx4C5TnBwYTh5w1Ut11rBQ9htq8vKjn40u6auvJXMqI43Qw OwaVDvPTUBXKvDuAlUhbVR3VGM+BTLuaLZN7cOISFdD0w2gLtk0AUlSyIqmwchFyL+Pp hOWn8679On2rf8PR8TAL1S/2UzG2FJ6T3x4acaKsAypRWz67XOPx7ll2MyQXKhOdPmw6 FWwO6ipUebjvyXkc7GADvqNCV/JEYwF5kEC2q1BQW/hiANmNwWm+FrRnhDOIn5P/cpBE RwhQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 3si358697plq.608.2017.10.20.01.51.32; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 01:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752577AbdJTIvB (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 20 Oct 2017 04:51:01 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:36645 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752159AbdJTIu7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2017 04:50:59 -0400 Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2017 01:50:59 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,405,1503385200"; d="scan'208";a="165397136" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2017 01:50:59 -0700 Received: from dazhang1-ssd.sh.intel.com (unknown [10.239.48.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2A25801AC; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 01:50:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:51:35 +0800 From: Yi Zhang To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Jim Mattson , kvm list , LKML , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Alex Williamson Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/10] Intel EPT-Based Sub-page Write Protection Support. Message-ID: <20171020085135.GH88002@dazhang1-ssd.sh.intel.com> Mail-Followup-To: Paolo Bonzini , Jim Mattson , kvm list , LKML , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Alex Williamson References: <250725286.12444082.1507929205754.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <20171016000841.GB66870@dazhang1-ssd.sh.intel.com> <96efaece-306c-cde3-06d6-553505612136@redhat.com> <20171018140715.GB28204@dazhang1-ssd.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2017-10-19 at 13:57:12 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > I would leave out the ioctl without a use case. It's always tricky to > add APIs without a user, as the risk of bit rot is high. But if > somebody comes up with a matching useful patch for QEMU or kvmtool, it's > fine. That's fine, leave it out. > > > Except the interface change, could you please help to review the other > > patch series? just skip the ioctl patch( patch 7). > > Yes, of course. Thank Thanks Thankss. > > Paolo From 1581765699610981771@xxx Fri Oct 20 08:48:42 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1581152810958355510 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums