Received: by 10.223.164.221 with SMTP id h29csp2772472wrb; Thu, 2 Nov 2017 17:47:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Tg/AbKbG/2cDbwKAMUNli9E2CFqZgCLEVJwfJh7/w2zIUcEU+fMkbt4EuWANpPax+/e1yD X-Received: by 10.159.195.69 with SMTP id z5mr5023156pln.183.1509670028715; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 17:47:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1509670028; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mFtAjfH3ektBuQSWNvExPlervp6ZPgpELwHwnzmAbEOQUBu7Cxveki3/PMm2SqpFhQ DSx2o84Fb3zmAnL224EaR4CCYV34dz6Vr8z2nwGXFaAt+XIMQRM1J/NwOcPKXyXI7zZ6 0iuniE0k71SFTnYOBiCFmuR8B+DDuVIycqZjWa3/7xaOXmEgf4PohxyE+WcRJUxQp54k ig9EXUnBLmMjm8jxYaEX8mvlGvHaT/V01XH8O3mDehyQDrtVnfZMmL5hOVlr7PPtFaYK 0B+GkQEoBSYjbJ1ujHH9JfO7Cs+ORcKizrvVVmRFCG77wCdDhLxnCFumg8yezNlljKYu nz8w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=B1cNzk4FVmFQFaDFccgZITjoOD3de9ZmjFOK/Kat6XQ=; b=Wo4cVxn8uCKKSaENZW4DDRgORu7SKacDgGhGVe8Ef+9Kjpl7hmpL4MwXrfxsUao/br yavSiTZKCjKxypg2rgjADyOXIhHdhDODNprFC9LJrqoYIBYVDqe1ind0qw0n3PRP7/zj Iqsq3qPEqyzPziilSgBLsV32nwe4bo/nQSlu0x76CLQf+06dkQjgEIz3DXbaIug12sJz ofGff+Bmel9TC7uMB9YCZalddRAAn6fU18YsXukURq5EqQJmTIB8JEK5C+CiTLtgwwix OHPmDIZ8qTuf+NDyvhofGrADWt3euYtLJTHvRXj6Nh5Q7E2N1TiijjJT9s02lbrkX9wq wvHA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@bandewar-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=pNemtZKG; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o15si4735694pgq.475.2017.11.02.17.46.54; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 17:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@bandewar-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=pNemtZKG; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965027AbdKCAot (ORCPT + 96 others); Thu, 2 Nov 2017 20:44:49 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f195.google.com ([209.85.223.195]:57145 "EHLO mail-io0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964988AbdKCAol (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Nov 2017 20:44:41 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f195.google.com with SMTP id m81so2836774ioi.13 for ; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 17:44:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bandewar-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=B1cNzk4FVmFQFaDFccgZITjoOD3de9ZmjFOK/Kat6XQ=; b=pNemtZKGaQvdvGebUeisuWgpOngJ9efKbB5Geuhv0LLF9QfDkVx5YlYaCccvvn5yVB rfswVi8ISIfVWuu5US0hxlPU44Bxi05G7W1S0fi/EJ3cOL77EFBjr5Dl695tEBlv+Quz WV3O5f7gPfXJVqCjqLeLhCOahM9MfImAwBPBeXctgQ2f7kezyI4J0ElkyuNKP2eBlVyi F0mkGBT1I6dd6tyKwxNse6g4rmEjrx7ITFleGksG9BmKjtumgDCbw80009EmnIA7rd3w ICapfg+gpu+x1xJdFDg2NX723YAYum2pzl+vvIKYnlIutxk11l11xXLD1wpi62L1Th9o BDnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=B1cNzk4FVmFQFaDFccgZITjoOD3de9ZmjFOK/Kat6XQ=; b=p+sZzsDyc4fm+mRMQVv6OzD8/tDp1UiR7NR5VDAVfzxDA8Riq8SGcGo3KRBEbBy7Ew YIBnZdAHStj0CLaQCGDSUh5tCi0J/PEb0kV6+5vU+lB0TslyXI1Wa3hZqI9xURlItM48 5Nyahaeww+5zf+aYIOB9RU48B2FZkR34V/Y7DxxqE2lNzNUbUIUGluDZzrHjuydU2T52 //AoEZJMwxsSs4nK69DBU24Lhr0653myyUMWNZ3oE1GUNNi4UIe71AWmS5kaYklFU3Qf +YdcT8rIV2KXInvLuLgcg93MRrYnzKON0EDIkDdsz+Q/3ME+JWg+HJ4IHBime8QNRZhf sXdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXQrap7nZfT5sQtmybhLedk5uPUSEN8XVpmVw7feqzWVlqchSUd NFsIJmOV+T5rzc/I+o8qEVQvc7CglGo= X-Received: by 10.107.169.199 with SMTP id f68mr6707459ioj.162.1509669880175; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 17:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:15c:2c4:201:1c44:73ca:1ad1:f607]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 10sm2124056ios.17.2017.11.02.17.44.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Nov 2017 17:44:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Mahesh Bandewar To: LKML , Netdev Cc: Kernel-hardening , Linux API , Kees Cook , Serge Hallyn , "Eric W . Biederman" , Eric Dumazet , David Miller , Mahesh Bandewar , Mahesh Bandewar Subject: [PATCH resend 2/2] userns: control capabilities of some user namespaces Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 17:44:36 -0700 Message-Id: <20171103004436.40026-1-mahesh@bandewar.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.15.0.403.gc27cc4dac6-goog Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Mahesh Bandewar With this new notion of "controlled" user-namespaces, the controlled user-namespaces are marked at the time of their creation while the capabilities of processes that belong to them are controlled using the global mask. Init-user-ns is always uncontrolled and a process that has SYS_ADMIN that belongs to uncontrolled user-ns can create another (child) user- namespace that is uncontrolled. Any other process (that either does not have SYS_ADMIN or belongs to a controlled user-ns) can only create a user-ns that is controlled. global-capability-whitelist (controlled_userns_caps_whitelist) is used at the capability check-time and keeps the semantics for the processes that belong to uncontrolled user-ns as it is. Processes that belong to controlled user-ns however are subjected to different checks- (a) if the capability in question is controlled and process belongs to controlled user-ns, then it's always denied. (b) if the capability in question is NOT controlled then fall back to the traditional check. Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar --- include/linux/capability.h | 1 + include/linux/user_namespace.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/capability.c | 5 +++++ kernel/user_namespace.c | 3 +++ security/commoncap.c | 8 ++++++++ 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/capability.h b/include/linux/capability.h index 6c0b9677c03f..b8c6cac18658 100644 --- a/include/linux/capability.h +++ b/include/linux/capability.h @@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ extern bool ptracer_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, struct user_namespace *ns); extern int get_vfs_caps_from_disk(const struct dentry *dentry, struct cpu_vfs_cap_data *cpu_caps); int proc_douserns_caps_whitelist(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buff, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos); +bool is_capability_controlled(int cap); extern int cap_convert_nscap(struct dentry *dentry, void **ivalue, size_t size); diff --git a/include/linux/user_namespace.h b/include/linux/user_namespace.h index c18e01252346..e890fe81b47e 100644 --- a/include/linux/user_namespace.h +++ b/include/linux/user_namespace.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct uid_gid_map { /* 64 bytes -- 1 cache line */ }; #define USERNS_SETGROUPS_ALLOWED 1UL +#define USERNS_CONTROLLED 2UL #define USERNS_INIT_FLAGS USERNS_SETGROUPS_ALLOWED @@ -102,6 +103,16 @@ static inline void put_user_ns(struct user_namespace *ns) __put_user_ns(ns); } +static inline bool is_user_ns_controlled(const struct user_namespace *ns) +{ + return ns->flags & USERNS_CONTROLLED; +} + +static inline void mark_user_ns_controlled(struct user_namespace *ns) +{ + ns->flags |= USERNS_CONTROLLED; +} + struct seq_operations; extern const struct seq_operations proc_uid_seq_operations; extern const struct seq_operations proc_gid_seq_operations; @@ -160,6 +171,15 @@ static inline struct ns_common *ns_get_owner(struct ns_common *ns) { return ERR_PTR(-EPERM); } + +static inline bool is_user_ns_controlled(const struct user_namespace *ns) +{ + return false; +} + +static inline void mark_user_ns_controlled(struct user_namespace *ns) +{ +} #endif #endif /* _LINUX_USER_H */ diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c index 62dbe3350c1b..40a38cc4ff43 100644 --- a/kernel/capability.c +++ b/kernel/capability.c @@ -510,6 +510,11 @@ bool ptracer_capable(struct task_struct *tsk, struct user_namespace *ns) } /* Controlled-userns capabilities routines */ +bool is_capability_controlled(int cap) +{ + return !cap_raised(controlled_userns_caps_whitelist, cap); +} + #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL int proc_douserns_caps_whitelist(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void __user *buff, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) diff --git a/kernel/user_namespace.c b/kernel/user_namespace.c index c490f1e4313b..f393ea5108f0 100644 --- a/kernel/user_namespace.c +++ b/kernel/user_namespace.c @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ static void set_cred_user_ns(struct cred *cred, struct user_namespace *user_ns) cred->cap_effective = CAP_FULL_SET; cred->cap_ambient = CAP_EMPTY_SET; cred->cap_bset = CAP_FULL_SET; + if (!ns_capable(user_ns->parent, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) || + is_user_ns_controlled(user_ns->parent)) + mark_user_ns_controlled(user_ns); #ifdef CONFIG_KEYS key_put(cred->request_key_auth); cred->request_key_auth = NULL; diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c index fc46f5b85251..89103f16ac37 100644 --- a/security/commoncap.c +++ b/security/commoncap.c @@ -73,6 +73,14 @@ int cap_capable(const struct cred *cred, struct user_namespace *targ_ns, { struct user_namespace *ns = targ_ns; + /* If the capability is controlled and user-ns that process + * belongs-to is 'controlled' then return EPERM and no need + * to check the user-ns hierarchy. + */ + if (is_user_ns_controlled(cred->user_ns) && + is_capability_controlled(cap)) + return -EPERM; + /* See if cred has the capability in the target user namespace * by examining the target user namespace and all of the target * user namespace's parents. -- 2.15.0.403.gc27cc4dac6-goog From 1583668828024502754@xxx Fri Nov 10 08:58:06 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1582421855303020993 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread