Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755487AbYAOKbm (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:31:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751173AbYAOKbb (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:31:31 -0500 Received: from fxip-0047f.externet.hu ([88.209.222.127]:45448 "EHLO pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750768AbYAOKba (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:31:30 -0500 To: serue@us.ibm.com CC: miklos@szeredi.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hch@infradead.org, serue@us.ibm.com, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, ebiederm@xmission.com, kzak@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, util-linux-ng@vger.kernel.org In-reply-to: <20080114232419.GH6704@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> (serue@us.ibm.com) Subject: Re: [patch 7/9] unprivileged mounts: allow unprivileged fuse mounts References: <20080108113502.184459371@szeredi.hu> <20080108113630.861045063@szeredi.hu> <20080114232419.GH6704@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> Message-Id: From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:29:57 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 576 Lines: 18 > Sounds like a sysctl to enable FS_SAFE for fuse will make this patch > acceptable to everyone? I think the most generic approach, is to be able to set "safeness" for any fs type, not just fuse (Karel's suggestion). E.g: echo 1 > /proc/sys/fs/types/cifs/safe This would also provide a way to query the FS_SAFE flag. Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/