Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753511AbYAOMWW (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:22:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751144AbYAOMWH (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:22:07 -0500 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:41963 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751140AbYAOMWE (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:22:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:22:01 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Shaohua Li Cc: linux-pci , Greg KH , "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , "Kok, Auke" , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH]PCIE ASPM support - takes 2 Message-ID: <20080115122200.GW18741@parisc-linux.org> References: <1200367276.20538.1.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> <20080115041943.GS18741@parisc-linux.org> <1200373622.20869.2.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1200373622.20869.2.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1191 Lines: 33 On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 01:07:02PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote: > > > + > > > +/* Called after ACPI is enabled */ > > > +static int __init acpi_pcie_support_init(void) > > > +{ > > > + pcie_aspm_init(); > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > +fs_initcall(acpi_pcie_support_init); > > > > Is there any reason to put this in here instead of just making > > pcie_aspm_init an initcall? > yes, this will evaluate some ACPI methods, so must be called after ACPI > is initialized, which is a sub_system call I wasn't saying that you should change it from being an fs_initcall. I was saying that you might want to consider deleting this function and adding fs_initcall(pcie_aspm_init); in the file that defines pcie_aspm_init. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/