Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:47:19 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: accensi@gmail.com, serue@us.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
       hch@infradead.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, ebiederm@xmission.com,
       kzak@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.osdl.org,
       util-linux-ng@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 9/9] unprivileged mounts: add "no submounts" flag
Message-ID: <20080115134719.GB4453@sergelap.austin.ibm.com>
References: <20080108113502.184459371@szeredi.hu> <20080108113634.382855604@szeredi.hu> <20080114233910.GI6704@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <E1JEjEE-0000xZ-RU@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu> <643ea2b10801150253i735d7342q73bf01f864d6167c@mail.gmail.com> <E1JEjUx-00010q-Ny@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1JEjUx-00010q-Ny@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 661
Lines: 19

Quoting Miklos Szeredi (miklos@szeredi.hu):
> > Why not "nosubmnt"?
> 
> Why not indeed.  Maybe I should try to use my brain sometime.

Well it really should have 'user' or 'unpriv' in the name
somewhere.  'nosubmnt' is more confusing than 'nomnt' because
it no submounts really sounds like a reasonable thing in
itself...

But I never win naming arguments, so I accept that I have poor
naming judgement  :)

-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/