Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp1611205wrb; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 07:00:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TVbSQedAlq7gC4qRwupEckSouCyTBsl6Ls8up+d65Feb9Xh93X4HuV97R4G5su6qrMLvdD X-Received: by 10.99.0.214 with SMTP id 205mr715000pga.283.1510153229671; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 07:00:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1510153229; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FqTPQHzomJyTQoboQJKN98WkOUorb+LL1NjewN/TOixLo9ff63J5yjkBjS+SHNzW74 dIew2p3NCHT3KG89fLaEo6FHgPDKGyqQXVIpV0M+s0cbllJVagvLWqc+olc5Jqq+jGp8 TzbPLde7eth7TXBn2OWXVeqCEumKf56e1cyUGaTtXPyalW1iZNREivEIwGS3SlXbqidq SFWr8IDmZHY+gGtQ2vtBKpvgwWl7O5vTBJ8vtdB1JpzjEWq2iVUcmKd4XHSmNiTzSlhv I32OYvmEzXmcRWZdcCfTnYpxnJz0SQE7IOTaEGEIjsZq+czSeB/vccOnw2v4AMq14KcC KijA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=mXCj7xgrwlG6Z3rQKAYW9+eCb/IZIlbZkiKal+P41gE=; b=uRvhCjyyK80QKMHKeg5Jdsm2/cRC4iB1leeaKkmbc01Nn2SaDRt9n0MbPdzivjhH0I IT8xKrkWJdtVPpvo3EdBUtLzfOMij4ufIiGf0QUxmX2QgfWVjo5NRrB5IkhMWiNmmeM4 gpTIJQovrPm49KKPZClrvqC6vomyo3Icym/pAcevQSpbydrkNki7tf2kK5FX1OJlrHqA TjUXHh03VGoRoR3+0tP6cUIFCEgRhlT0dSkaB9utIBoOzqhgMdQlYq9Zb5WADLaMEhVI s2bG7RUPIUtrUjeNFmqMGcpspVOtA0e+xXY0y8nazFh73ZxfD4I9rp72FHNzeWOufUtc Zb1Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=DKaBnmQI; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y4si4137579plb.122.2017.11.08.07.00.16; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 07:00:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=DKaBnmQI; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752585AbdKHO7k (ORCPT + 82 others); Wed, 8 Nov 2017 09:59:40 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f196.google.com ([209.85.161.196]:51616 "EHLO mail-yw0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751356AbdKHO7i (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2017 09:59:38 -0500 Received: by mail-yw0-f196.google.com with SMTP id k3so2499137ywk.8 for ; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 06:59:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=mXCj7xgrwlG6Z3rQKAYW9+eCb/IZIlbZkiKal+P41gE=; b=DKaBnmQIuVJb/FHcuIySAlu9oRdNSnOe8qQa3UsWBmK+gaBa0LGN7G2KeLOuNKSllt ESlJbh1tgof6jH9IJlvX4nSjaOp53H55bGcNZUfMeGT/mpIrlog6pGjthPNHkYaOmyHy izC6NQQHLdO8fUnt1aFdHum1StSCcgm9WS4+fdZzu64G1z6jj7hXiXmBsxUIzuQxWpKd qWhx+uFODNs5h3yVIc5SJyhRkkNoHh3JdHCD/7H8l1s1CRfxvzdOlpxHP9JJCsljaQb+ YJf6bGw0Ym7bPwRAdG3vmAeQxtlNyj9usqi9QwvtR2H22Xfoz5Bgq8ejrdTAasuhUFVF N3Hw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=mXCj7xgrwlG6Z3rQKAYW9+eCb/IZIlbZkiKal+P41gE=; b=Aihp6M2uvIc0LMZ21XTiNfsYNi6HE310cMfcdREOke7hRmSn/BOW3pfnX9CxEUxrCZ 8uXHw5YFZozoPTXjAAbOcPvZNr/GQZKLuaKjxPEC3Ofmej2o5TrwcD3NLbJ1rIJzel5x GT1ugusNTIClx9HxTpIEDqGgRP97bS7n5OMQ3AXp7zsXJ5RxVFJhbH6m4o6orYT9elN9 OGzZZmVZ5lAv1WZv+WPPB/pcwKvNMNWWz1srATAY6cBe+AhPEF1Cm3w7TXk3TmsxILob tbCDB5SfrAoR0u02EMeXyuWZJXwDoyjG82w5Mv/1WG3A1aSVxI3Jppfr13B3pp4kKt9M QRyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5vaCzVO9a3yRcVryNbNKHc0CN1htwS7k8aBb1PKojodgzVqDlM 1X8WVaeRnwj2fyriIfZ+wuc= X-Received: by 10.129.169.68 with SMTP id g65mr544370ywh.134.1510153178116; Wed, 08 Nov 2017 06:59:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from josharch ([64.53.114.237]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n134sm2246646ywn.27.2017.11.08.06.59.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Nov 2017 06:59:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 09:59:36 -0500 From: Josh Abraham To: Greg KH Cc: ruxandra.radulescu@nxp.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fsl-dpaa2: Fix multiple assignments should be avoided Message-ID: <20171108145936.GA5506@josharch> References: <20171108004503.GA27756@josharch> <20171108092048.GB22620@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171108092048.GB22620@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:20:48AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 07:45:03PM -0500, Joshua Abraham wrote: > > This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl warning: > > "CHECK: multiple assignments should be avoided" > > > > Signed-off-by: Joshua Abraham > > --- > > drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c b/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c > > index 0d8ed002adcb..384218946108 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/fsl-dpaa2/ethernet/dpaa2-eth.c > > @@ -1661,7 +1661,8 @@ static void set_fq_affinity(struct dpaa2_eth_priv *priv) > > * This may well change at runtime, either through irqbalance or > > * through direct user intervention. > > */ > > - rx_cpu = txc_cpu = cpumask_first(&priv->dpio_cpumask); > > + rx_cpu = cpumask_first(&priv->dpio_cpumask); > > + txc_cpu = rx_cpu; > > The original code here makes much more sense, doesn't it? > > Sometimes checkpatch is wrong :) > > thanks, > > greg k-h It does make a lot more sense. I will trust checkpatch less, and my eyes more :) -Josh From 1583497854592704504@xxx Wed Nov 08 11:40:34 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1583467621433963499 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread