Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp436823wrb; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 08:39:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TJ35TZ0JkWnUU8kRlfpK0WUUrVVlDZJX9tA58PaoRTh3YIx9ZoMsMW4UK2boQ2BLAD8Yjk X-Received: by 10.159.229.130 with SMTP id az2mr19010317plb.113.1510072765720; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 08:39:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1510072765; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=091ak8eVk9yEEOcod9nGHFV+rCvYP6AC6ZHrImN88pFYgC0BMbOyGgeyVI1CvL/mx6 iPHljgSG1vYKSxtvspNAZa5JEITdQJNWumZsS5EjaI4wO2cFkWxlUgOaEJ2DijouWFp6 FcpE7n8OzI3bXUhOkdCMh6jEfz04ipx7FSncJPp0IXqmQG5COJe3z3OkZtiOfmBxvnOd 7jcf2iZjuAUliuIUig4JvIX6ML+dvaMT9uYISYl3pWGYduKS1IOjQVkYoLe8iKOXK1iH 6W0LDW0qlyv0GY9kfIIJ/AOwIo29mNclg3FB91s1X52KLTa5ZOVzYMnSFZwVie2xL4AV lnkA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dmarc-filter:arc-authentication-results; bh=z9aCiZqpLyH9qLoF63zREByDd9foAPUXFkEvFA7FXb8=; b=Pdh2qTRi4y5MYaw3i2TSgYSrvtRcW6Dp60px+WjiP6QbCQLwUVZyloddOduPbwjjxo 8aI63ouddfs6GDQARgf99D6BttWSkITV0nKBbPr4/6rVTYH3ZUHrBP7KZROYii6q/GGv 95OLR40ZJnHpv9L16ZsGUD7nRvyDhEA5lErh+ZhPUlkANZPJFkZAP+2+WGMxAEniZlGc W/pxmKfSBi1E4u9Kv8BX4YTCniLyFfNfHqQpwnv4MQYFa0QEn5B5iJDvMtc64wJeUaee 2XKwbNRXwFswunll3+mt6VQU6dQQbX/Klf6ivPFkWQ0Ev7ygNO1eniBrk9Af7KyGA3yQ lT0A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g14si1648420plj.420.2017.11.07.08.39.13; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 08:39:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933465AbdKGD0j (ORCPT + 91 others); Mon, 6 Nov 2017 22:26:39 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38112 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932919AbdKGD0i (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2017 22:26:38 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.0.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD68F21870; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 03:26:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DD68F21870 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=jaegeuk@kernel.org Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 19:26:36 -0800 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Yunlong Song Cc: chao@kernel.org, yuchao0@huawei.com, yunlong.song@icloud.com, miaoxie@huawei.com, bintian.wang@huawei.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: add bug_on when f2fs_gc even fails to get one victim Message-ID: <20171107032636.GB92599@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> References: <1507729864-118702-1-git-send-email-yunlong.song@huawei.com> <1507901500-162168-1-git-send-email-yunlong.song@huawei.com> <20171103034402.GC11335@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <3b26badb-c34e-3c2d-74a2-26ecef1f64ff@huawei.com> <20171107023835.GG88544@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> <20171107024058.GH88544@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.2 (2017-04-18) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/07, Yunlong Song wrote: > Because I find that some out-of-free problem is caused by the failure > of get victim target. For example, chao has pointed out that he has > found out a bug when adding this bug_on last week. That's NOT what I asked. Why not checking FG_GC all the time like this? f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !total_freed && gc_type == FG_GC); > > On 2017/11/7 10:40, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 11/06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > > On 11/06, Yunlong Song wrote: > > > > Agree. > > > > > > > > On 2017/11/3 11:44, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > > > > On 10/13, Yunlong Song wrote: > > > > > > This can help us to debug on some corner case. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu > > > > > > --- > > > > > > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 6 +++++- > > > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c > > > > > > index 197ebf4..2b03202 100644 > > > > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c > > > > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c > > > > > > @@ -986,6 +986,7 @@ int f2fs_gc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool sync, > > > > > > .ilist = LIST_HEAD_INIT(gc_list.ilist), > > > > > > .iroot = RADIX_TREE_INIT(GFP_NOFS), > > > > > > }; > > > > > > + bool need_fggc = false; > > > > > > trace_f2fs_gc_begin(sbi->sb, sync, background, > > > > > > get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES), > > > > > > @@ -1018,8 +1019,10 @@ int f2fs_gc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool sync, > > > > > > if (ret) > > > > > > goto stop; > > > > > > } > > > > > > - if (has_not_enough_free_secs(sbi, 0, 0)) > > > > > > + if (has_not_enough_free_secs(sbi, 0, 0)) { > > > > > > gc_type = FG_GC; > > > > > > + need_fggc = true; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > } > > > > > > /* f2fs_balance_fs doesn't need to do BG_GC in critical path. */ > > > > > > @@ -1028,6 +1031,7 @@ int f2fs_gc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool sync, > > > > > > goto stop; > > > > > > } > > > > > > if (!__get_victim(sbi, &segno, gc_type)) { > > > > > > + f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !total_freed && need_fggc); > > > > > Just like this? > > > > That's OK. > > > I'm not quite sure whether this is really a bug_on case. > > > Let me make it WARN_ON() for debugging purpose first. > > BTW, why is this the special case where BG_GC detects FG_GC? > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !total_freed && !sync && gc_type == FG_GC); > > > > > > > > > > > ret = -ENODATA; > > > > > > goto stop; > > > > > > } > > > > > > -- > > > > > > 1.8.5.2 > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thanks, > > > > Yunlong Song > > > > > > . > > > > -- > Thanks, > Yunlong Song > From 1583422272466936677@xxx Tue Nov 07 15:39:13 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1580969854381445046 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread