Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 22 Nov 2000 02:58:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 22 Nov 2000 02:58:33 -0500 Received: from slc389.modem.xmission.com ([166.70.2.135]:29451 "EHLO flinx.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 22 Nov 2000 02:58:31 -0500 To: Aaron Sethman Cc: Roberto Fichera , Jakob Xstergaard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Ext2 & Performances In-Reply-To: From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 21 Nov 2000 22:41:53 -0700 In-Reply-To: Aaron Sethman's message of "Tue, 21 Nov 2000 13:36:55 -0500 (EST)" Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Aaron Sethman writes: > You might want to take a look at using reiserfs on the 130GB partition, as > its is journalled and doesn't need to be fsck'ed. No. All journaling filesystems need to be fsck'ed. A correctly operating one simply doesn't need to be fsck'ed because of unexpected loss of operating system. Which brings greatly reduce the probability. If an error is detected in the filesystem fsck is still what you have to do to correct it. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/