Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp737347wrb; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 13:45:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QyPwsLJU/tPNL8AMbuwX/Zi6GcH+L1t/6VVSEmWDVkxsTVczIxdYvNDPH20SAn4mbN81N8 X-Received: by 10.99.124.91 with SMTP id l27mr144641pgn.49.1510091109009; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:45:09 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1510091108; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=j4FEiwfl8z0d7gPkVqEpBpB5zEF/hMYOUNbRRQxbHeVVYXa3Wi4TNwXOw9PVTsYM5y zzQwu1JnDxo4GelELubU4vexzm1n/tg0FETsEsOHyzP++SEcbK4T6s3l//lPHyr6gO1A a1sXleXaBB3z9xTOqonbw449fMlTSQpPiqnocigW7fVo3F7CK3h/XfXAOuL2mC/6rjUb muPihdjJjXrGI5cFTW746kLDfQYFmjcpnfh8HdQTkP+MrWN5YF/oKmUsJviN7HiDQ6sL GrnaiLI86Cxq82t6GvP1zQbAM1Z9QNsRaVLoaRJ9b+O9SGah7z1ZPMKJKzinf77mXglF P/0w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=pyJ0tKZ53ls1204z85625gkWqhFdL+xReYeLgYIgXg8=; b=ITgMfPVFpPra3lzm7ZevkzyfhMuLM1oRr9rob2Blzlit01b0yRRrpoj/pyAHmqDuLt ikkmuWN6Q/LiOyZKr99HBXzYx6OQC5vKwv7jseEHOM9R1LxuJmyuyf5y+nKm5jOT1wXt jvReM5Yt2afCehzRAP28/dyxi3PEl9U2RkzZw5TWd6NVf+LWn43xck5re6+YgQAp8gsX GT8/VyHdEyTGXUL5Xafqrp2cQDxaIOVvDPd4xSpcFhtqSP0MX4LaAbR3YM1I8lqN1yJg cxOaJiMf0gJFSd1yEwEeqLnWU3EqC2kSTj5/QgIqav6R92igrCEo5+J6ucFC30NbHuRr oKGQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b5si1777147plm.349.2017.11.07.13.44.55; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 13:45:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756542AbdKGLDv (ORCPT + 91 others); Tue, 7 Nov 2017 06:03:51 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:48280 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755161AbdKGLDu (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2017 06:03:50 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAB114; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 03:03:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.210.47] (e108031-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.210.47]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06E2B3F220; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 03:03:47 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: schedutil: Examine the correct CPU when we update util To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux PM , Morten Rasmussen , Dietmar Eggemann , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra References: <20171103034022.GD4240@vireshk-i7> <20171103133642.8636-1-chris.redpath@arm.com> <20171103154559.GJ4240@vireshk-i7> <65a16c84-d25f-26ce-b4cf-5edc3f9b6d32@arm.com> <20171107095951.GE3297@vireshk-i7> From: Chris Redpath Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 11:03:46 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thanks guys, really appreciated! --Chris On 07/11/17 10:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 07-11-17, 09:49, Chris Redpath wrote: >>> Hi Viresh, Rafael, >>> >>> Without this patch, schedutil is totally broken for us - is >>> there any chance at all this could go in 4.14 or is it just >>> too late? >> >> I see that Rafael has already applied it, but not sure if he is planning to send >> it for 4.14 (though he should IMHO, as it is a critical fix). > > Yes, I am. > > Thanks, > Rafael > From 1583409027867496810@xxx Tue Nov 07 12:08:42 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1582951591518861812 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread