Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Yang Shi" <yang.s@alibaba-inc.com>
To:     mhocko@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc:     "Yang Shi" <yang.s@alibaba-inc.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mm: use in_atomic() in print_vma_addr()
Date:   Thu, 02 Nov 2017 05:38:33 +0800
Message-Id: <1509572313-102989-1-git-send-email-yang.s@alibaba-inc.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

commit 3e51f3c4004c9b01f66da03214a3e206f5ed627b
("sched/preempt: Remove PREEMPT_ACTIVE unmasking off in_atomic()") makes
in_atomic() just check the preempt count, so it is not necessary to use
preempt_count() in print_vma_addr() any more. Replace preempt_count() to
in_atomic() which is a generic API for checking atomic context.

Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.s@alibaba-inc.com>
---
 mm/memory.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index a728bed..19b684e 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4460,7 +4460,7 @@ void print_vma_addr(char *prefix, unsigned long ip)
 	 * Do not print if we are in atomic
 	 * contexts (in exception stacks, etc.):
 	 */
-	if (preempt_count())
+	if (in_atomic())
 		return;
 
 	down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
-- 
1.8.3.1


From 1583463447573273599@xxx Wed Nov 08 02:33:40 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1583174360594116469
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread