Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp287417wrb; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 06:40:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TaQZ7wNtPcs47UJhxxxGB22xLp52uU27J639nDw+LnNkMctkSZx3BtsmJexcRyHzMFFIJQ X-Received: by 10.99.119.9 with SMTP id s9mr15321895pgc.54.1509979213495; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 06:40:13 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1509979213; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ES6b1ykxCoFNFKe47AbB5ORRi/ahhwVPWD3jfgsfagcZa4+0eAisGp/nHBD+l4qphg ue+4gqA5eYcfEIyM7nLzx8WAs55lVA0KJR8RoYQrLl5kqhOoXyPBWlaLkuJm+HEEKBsI gm47OhT7pQSJt4dquITmLGfMKKUX/2bYX8DuaV1MEQSILHTkUJlzl1FGbfeqM/rmP1QE j83+6/eUj6N35+3KvM6rHfISZ4qbt0pU+a6T0cpYNZtq5YHKaMk6d5wMVTjcpo1VgMZF KCplDQG/X3ViReGkl+lActB0j0qJyQ7BD0Sj5FONk541pVG5TbA0g2LZu1lyjLiLTlEr qeXg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=eLUtUPXioqP5MT7Ibw/yeH9UTLQsFrkZzTUWKSG+ZEg=; b=xv8JL+7z89r22CtXV7FW/F1lj2YkiPxwJ9R4DfEy/SpCJBFVvd9WAZRYIkDDvyo9aK cZbAnutkgwnZX+G07JbxKfdiSapnFM+9sOD09dnrcIn3VQR82VZD1BlL8dyo/IMIwGZ+ A5BqAa0wuj/sBeOL1lz52f8Lk4DtoAyrrdkLHZiXRXsTgRnn6cPSRZ/v+AoCI0emfBd9 vjv60yUcDgUZ0X1Kcr3E+z1VnHV8U6WbknYufHR0iekb4nyS1g69qU676iXGmh3D3uol IlSWHhKrQUmdNuRy952qdtpserSjO+IqBxxTj0YIWUMDo9nsNgfPUUG515r/FlOK4oQ0 Vxkg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c2si10331577pli.472.2017.11.06.06.39.59; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 06:40:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932427AbdKFOin (ORCPT + 97 others); Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:38:43 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:28211 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753039AbdKFOik (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2017 09:38:40 -0500 Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Nov 2017 06:38:38 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,352,1505804400"; d="scan'208";a="146491344" Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([10.232.112.44]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2017 06:38:38 -0800 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 07:43:04 -0700 From: Keith Busch To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gonz=E1lez?= , sagi@grimberg.me, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gonz=E1lez?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] nvme: do not check for ns on rw path Message-ID: <20171106144303.GA11677@localhost.localdomain> References: <1509703370-20379-1-git-send-email-javier@cnexlabs.com> <1509703370-20379-2-git-send-email-javier@cnexlabs.com> <20171103125339.GA25186@lst.de> <20171103150203.GA11300@localhost.localdomain> <20171104081825.GA19180@lst.de> <20171104153844.GA12777@localhost.localdomain> <20171106091323.GA30382@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171106091323.GA30382@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.0 (2017-09-02) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 10:13:24AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 09:38:45AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote: > > That's not quite right. For non-PI metadata formats, we use the > > 'nop_profile', which gets the metadata buffer allocated so we can safely > > use a metadata formatted namespace. There's no in-kernel user of the > > allocated payload, but we still need the metadata buffer in order to > > use the namespace at all. > > You're right. But that means we will indeed always have a matching > integrity payload here and the check should not be needed. > > Are you fine with turning it into something like: > > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ns->ms && !blk_integrity_rq(req))) > return BLK_STS_IOERR; > > ? Yes, that looks fine. You're right that we are not supposed to be able to get into this path for read/write since the driver sets the capacity to 0 if a metadata format doesn't have integrity support, so hitting this warning would indicate something has gone wrong. From 1583307537769878449@xxx Mon Nov 06 09:15:33 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1583038799453206809 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread