Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757876AbYAPCTG (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:19:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754750AbYAPCSy (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:18:54 -0500 Received: from smtp.ustc.edu.cn ([202.38.64.16]:35293 "HELO ustc.edu.cn" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754293AbYAPCSx (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:18:53 -0500 Message-ID: <400449941.28506@ustc.edu.cn> X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:18:48 +0800 From: Fengguang Wu To: Michael Rubin Cc: Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] writeback bug fixes and simplifications take 2 References: <400401292.24795@ustc.edu.cn> <532480950801151033w69411f8dk4d9ab14a2ff07d64@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <532480950801151033w69411f8dk4d9ab14a2ff07d64@mail.gmail.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 53D2 DDCE AB5C 8DC6 188B 1CB1 F766 DA34 8D8B 1C6D User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1447 Lines: 39 On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:33:01AM -0800, Michael Rubin wrote: > On Jan 15, 2008 4:36 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > Andrew, > > > > This patchset mainly polishes the writeback queuing policies. > > Anyone know which tree is this patched based out of? They are against the latest -mm tree, or 2.6.24-rc6-mm1. > > The main goals are: > > > > (1) small files should not be starved by big dirty files > > (2) sync as fast as possible for not-blocked inodes/pages > > - don't leave them out; no congestion_wait() in between them > > (3) avoid busy iowait for blocked inodes > > - retry them in the next go of s_io(maybe at the next wakeup of pdflush) > > > > Fengguang do you have any specific tests for any of these cases? As I > have posted earlier I am putting together a writeback test suite for > test.kernel.org and if you have one (even if it's an ugly shell > script) that would save me some time. No, I just run tests with cp/dd etc. I analyze the code and debug traces a lot, and know that it works in the situations I can imagine. But dedicated test suites are good in the long term. > Also if you want any of mine let me know. :-) OK, thank you. Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/