Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp62580wrb; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 02:37:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Tt/23UT+gl4vJsCw7MIMDuVJcnE/z8H+sWrxt3hPNIQuOGiQYYoTTVrb6xpwCwn9rXCHRA X-Received: by 10.84.217.154 with SMTP id p26mr13684892pli.132.1509964624700; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 02:37:04 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1509964624; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SKkHDpq5G8ssm+vAhZhlkl9CQICIIP72knohS517DX0uuzJvrXm6z//iTBI4BHH9GS mOQOUBCprP5fXBKxc9L6ga8cO8B6eJpzmJYkC7nJRlw7yKM+i2duEaTSkVoql9EkVnFu 7Z/9vyQZxgZGtUSVptoNr4qi1b8ADjJZrUh/9NpnHcHSi5mxatWx7LTDjKr4iCM5U612 zDsPjS847XmPPDgUxJlZQjbi2WUdOQvbZwmblDS6AGg10dHq8r1+I3peOg+x7u01cGEt t3OnIp3BYxiQIw3lbXt1uuvIfOOaE/47GU9K9J1QRlPlThfQUPfUVWhh0QhjMspzYo42 Jefg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=5wKooCYRkk1hP/HnZfMOGohEgzXMj1Cf8GXz/f8TEwk=; b=zbfLfKuBnc+8Z25awulaxg+YyEPZV4MnpTYxRnSqPM+M/2icq6fYEKsn7i4exlLx/1 u3lMA/Xj4qFsqcVddMUFfSq8Y/0plSXlcjz+IsfcOz156C4a9uF3EDJJYDDVFgmQIt6r QRWW6LIhTJScKuUyRCAVYO9ZDBJaX0s0OzDDjqB7gvG9HFrai962WDCTDuvFxkOm0ZTJ rtszLDct9uEwfw5H1TlXVXngFW6MNI+3Uk5rz3ov7eAih3eU7KtzB1ZujywzgSCtaSga Y72FJTaA+AgvCzNEeS4wDg6jwe1TUSEFSc3TqlOcKNWdyDiXZaruPDE0sRbswhrs1+wC rspg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ItnXzUAB; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o190si11032118pga.827.2017.11.06.02.36.47; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 02:37:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ItnXzUAB; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752129AbdKFKf7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 6 Nov 2017 05:35:59 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f193.google.com ([209.85.223.193]:45067 "EHLO mail-io0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751136AbdKFKf5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2017 05:35:57 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f193.google.com with SMTP id i38so15191637iod.2; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 02:35:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5wKooCYRkk1hP/HnZfMOGohEgzXMj1Cf8GXz/f8TEwk=; b=ItnXzUABQumr7i5V0ZvQZ0OaVCNUzqOYrR8GMovQkfYKgVWWm6i1F20gv56TEvON5x 9md77bj90TS9lAAL9tALKg2y9WTv6q3L0ltvr17aZqjB9jBvn+I6Jj9/OA4wSxpmEU19 wlsr3YSZXk1avA4G78jcRqwnlppy36hGh4JO801fp3UZDvAf6ynT7lrhAQF6aPF56IGL rQnbH9pd0OohzP/2EzvIy5pueQU/05tf61E3ec4Nv413dGNzVJgUd5LztVcTaSHxmiIg uwHVW8lay4HvfOHRtIRbHjswx5BDagPAzXN468pXsVCPD8iTA3EfPN0yr2evSSFRIHIe fKaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5wKooCYRkk1hP/HnZfMOGohEgzXMj1Cf8GXz/f8TEwk=; b=cFiA72iTB83bYc339ImugILmTASO94Why+85NsHVQUt6tXRYH/GLkOKPMD6LjLAIeN 708qnZL8H+HWBcqQhPTD3pEiDURx5oYfcZAxc/sF5vs3TXVUHeTceCy7L02/ni9kHH3x BiUOJDa0fKHx1juOF5UMxPE4s4mQGkM3SA+yNvI6MbzE1bq2Co3dkpRUEXTTcmMTirmJ +Ly2Thp/jEk3F5jnKg80mGU2W4+4zk4IAZHM/6llxNS9SqqQLj6YCnPMx4dS3RSUUSiT EZXCzVRLIJ4acggWM4dAwXgSEtgnPi+ZGopLswC2gxxMqkwkRPmiVDHRf/CwWPF+mP5i WCew== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6wVAV+9mAXDceMJQEMjH8R+CMikDlRuTeRd60PcTwEKOcYZeWg iWVCe8nVkNZR0XKnYnXcy3F9DaUqlPQFKXM0sic= X-Received: by 10.107.46.8 with SMTP id i8mr19204990ioo.298.1509964556156; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 02:35:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.2.28.66 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 02:35:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20171019225050.25410-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20171019225050.25410-2-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20171020104807.GE20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <20171020210826.GJ20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> From: Tomer Maimon Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 12:35:55 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] arm: npcm: add basic support for Nuvoton BMCs To: Brendan Higgins Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Avi Fishman , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Rick Altherr , Florian Fainelli , devicetree , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, OpenBMC Maillist Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4 November 2017 at 02:49, Brendan Higgins wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:45 AM, Tomer Maimon wrote: >> Hi Brendan, >> >> Sorry for the delay, >> >> On 21 October 2017 at 00:08, Russell King - ARM Linux >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 01:57:47PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote: >>>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux >>>> wrote: >>>> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 03:50:48PM -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote: >>>> >> Adds basic support for the Nuvoton NPCM750 BMC. >>>> >> >>>> >> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins >>>> >> Reviewed-by: Tomer Maimon >>>> >> Reviewed-by: Avi Fishman >>>> >> Tested-by: Tomer Maimon >>>> >> Tested-by: Avi Fishman >>>> >> --- >>>> >> arch/arm/Kconfig | 2 + >>>> >> arch/arm/Makefile | 1 + >>>> >> arch/arm/mach-npcm/Kconfig | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> >> arch/arm/mach-npcm/Makefile | 3 ++ >>>> >> arch/arm/mach-npcm/headsmp.S | 17 +++++++++ >>>> >> arch/arm/mach-npcm/npcm7xx.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++ >>>> >> arch/arm/mach-npcm/platsmp.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> >> 7 files changed, 193 insertions(+) >>>> >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-npcm/Kconfig >>>> >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-npcm/Makefile >>>> >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-npcm/headsmp.S >>>> >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-npcm/npcm7xx.c >>>> >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-npcm/platsmp.c >>>> >> >>>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig >>>> >> index 61a0cb15067e..05543f1cfbde 100644 >>>> >> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig >>>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig >>>> >> @@ -782,6 +782,8 @@ source "arch/arm/mach-netx/Kconfig" >>>> >> >>>> >> source "arch/arm/mach-nomadik/Kconfig" >>>> >> >>>> >> +source "arch/arm/mach-npcm/Kconfig" >>>> >> + >>>> >> source "arch/arm/mach-nspire/Kconfig" >>>> >> >>>> >> source "arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig" >>>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/Makefile b/arch/arm/Makefile >>>> >> index 47d3a1ab08d2..60ca50c7d762 100644 >>>> >> --- a/arch/arm/Makefile >>>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/Makefile >>>> >> @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MEDIATEK) += mediatek >>>> >> machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXS) += mxs >>>> >> machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_NETX) += netx >>>> >> machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_NOMADIK) += nomadik >>>> >> +machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_NPCM) += npcm >>>> >> machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_NSPIRE) += nspire >>>> >> machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OXNAS) += oxnas >>>> >> machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP1) += omap1 >>>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-npcm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-npcm/Kconfig >>>> >> new file mode 100644 >>>> >> index 000000000000..21dfa8ce828f >>>> >> --- /dev/null >>>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-npcm/Kconfig >>>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ >>>> >> +menuconfig ARCH_NPCM >>>> >> + bool "Nuvoton NPCM Architecture" >>>> >> + select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB >>>> >> + select USE_OF >>>> >> + select PINCTRL >>>> >> + select PINCTRL_NPCM7XX >>>> >> + >>>> >> +if ARCH_NPCM >>>> >> + >>>> >> +comment "NPCMX50 CPU type" >>>> >> + >>>> >> +config CPU_NPCM750 >> >> I started the upstream process of NPCM7xx clocksource driver, I got >> the following comment >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg197916.html >> >> Is it possible to modify the the architecture configuration name to >> ARCH_NPCM7XX. > > You mean the CPU config: CPU_NPCM7XX? Sorry about the confusion, I mean to modify the CPU_NPCM750 to ARCH_NPCM750. > > I think the ARCH_NPCM is right, since that corresponds to this directory > which is for all ARM Nuvoton BMCs. > >> >>>> >> + depends on ARCH_NPCM && ARCH_MULTI_V7 >>>> >> + bool "Support for NPCM750 BMC CPU (Poleg)" >>>> >> + select CACHE_L2X0 >>>> >> + select CPU_V7 >>>> >> + select ARM_GIC >>>> >> + select HAVE_SMP >>>> >> + select SMP >>>> >> + select SMP_ON_UP >>>> >> + select HAVE_ARM_SCU >>>> >> + select HAVE_ARM_TWD if SMP >>>> >> + select ARM_ERRATA_720789 >>>> >> + select ARM_ERRATA_754322 >>>> >> + select ARM_ERRATA_764369 >>>> >> + select ARM_ERRATA_794072 >>>> >> + select PL310_ERRATA_588369 >>>> >> + select PL310_ERRATA_727915 >>>> >> + select USB_EHCI_ROOT_HUB_TT >>>> >> + select USB_ARCH_HAS_HCD >>>> >> + select USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI >>>> >> + select USB_EHCI_HCD >>>> >> + select USB_ARCH_HAS_OHCI >>>> >> + select USB_OHCI_HCD >>>> >> + select USB >>>> >> + select FIQ >>>> >> + select CPU_USE_DOMAINS >>>> >> + select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS >>>> >> + select CLKDEV_LOOKUP >>>> >> + select COMMON_CLK if OF >>>> >> + select NPCM750_TIMER >>>> >> + select MFD_SYSCON >>>> >> + help >>>> >> + Support for NPCM750 BMC CPU (Poleg). >>>> >> + >>>> >> + Nuvoton NPCM750 BMC based on the Cortex A9. >>>> >> + >>>> >> +endif >>>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-npcm/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-npcm/Makefile >>>> >> new file mode 100644 >>>> >> index 000000000000..78416055b854 >>>> >> --- /dev/null >>>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-npcm/Makefile >>>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ >>>> >> +AFLAGS_headsmp.o += -march=armv7-a >>>> >> + >>>> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_NPCM750) += npcm7xx.o platsmp.o headsmp.o >>>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-npcm/headsmp.S b/arch/arm/mach-npcm/headsmp.S >>>> >> new file mode 100644 >>>> >> index 000000000000..9fccbbd49ed4 >>>> >> --- /dev/null >>>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-npcm/headsmp.S >>>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ >>>> >> +/* >>>> >> + * Copyright 2017 Google, Inc. >>>> >> + * >>>> >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >>>> >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as >>>> >> + * published by the Free Software Foundation. >>>> >> + */ >>>> >> + >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> + >>>> >> +ENTRY(npcm7xx_secondary_startup) >>>> >> + safe_svcmode_maskall r0 >>>> >> + >>>> >> + b secondary_startup >>>> >> +ENDPROC(npcm7xx_secondary_startup) >>>> > >>>> > Why do you need this? The switch to svc mode is already handled by >>>> > secondary_startup. >>>> >>>> Florian Fainelli already brought this up: >>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg605126.html >>>> Without this the kernel complains that the core is started in >>>> "wrong/inconsistent mode": >>> >>> The solution would be a comment to indicate why it's necessary :) >>> >>>> >>>> SMP: Total of 2 processors activated (398.13 BogoMIPS). >>>> CPU: WARNING: CPU(s) started in wrong/inconsistent modes (primary CPU >>>> mode 0x13) >>>> CPU: This may indicate a broken bootloader or firmware. >>>> >>>> > >>>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-npcm/npcm7xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-npcm/npcm7xx.c >>>> >> new file mode 100644 >>>> >> index 000000000000..132e9d587857 >>>> >> --- /dev/null >>>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-npcm/npcm7xx.c >>>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ >>>> >> +/* >>>> >> + * Copyright (c) 2017 Nuvoton Technology corporation. >>>> >> + * Copyright 2017 Google, Inc. >>>> >> + * >>>> >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >>>> >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as >>>> >> + * published by the Free Software Foundation. >>>> >> + */ >>>> >> + >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> + >>>> >> +#define NPCM7XX_AUX_VAL (L310_AUX_CTRL_INSTR_PREFETCH | \ >>>> >> + L310_AUX_CTRL_DATA_PREFETCH | \ >>>> >> + L310_AUX_CTRL_NS_LOCKDOWN | \ >>>> >> + L310_AUX_CTRL_CACHE_REPLACE_RR | \ >>>> >> + L2C_AUX_CTRL_SHARED_OVERRIDE | \ >>>> >> + L310_AUX_CTRL_FULL_LINE_ZERO) >>>> > >>>> > Do you really need all these flags? >>>> >>>> Tomer, Avi, do we need these? I got this from the original version of >>>> the driver. >>> >>> The l2c driver manages L310_AUX_CTRL_FULL_LINE_ZERO itself, so you >>> shouldn't specify that. >>> >>> L2C_AUX_CTRL_SHARED_OVERRIDE is managed via the "arm,shared-override" >>> DT property, so you should use that in DT instead. >>> >>> Prefetching needs the prefetch control register configured to tune the >>> prefetching - that's platform specific so the l2c driver doesn't touch >>> it (it expects firmware to have configured it.) If firmware needs to >>> configure that, it might as well configure the flags too as they're >>> shared into that very same register. If not, I think the l2c prefetch >>> register defaults to a very small prefetch, and is probably not worth >>> setting the enable bits without configuring the depth of prefetch. >> >> Yes, we do it in the firmware. >> >>> >>> L310_AUX_CTRL_NS_LOCKDOWN is always enabled by the l2c driver, so >>> shouldn't be necessary. >>> >>> So that leaves only L310_AUX_CTRL_CACHE_REPLACE_RR. >>> >> >> You dont need to add L310_AUX_CTRL_CACHE_REPLACE_RR to the l2c aux value. >> >>>> >>>> > >>>> >> + >>>> >> +static const char *const npcm7xx_dt_match[] = { >>>> >> + "nuvoton,npcm750", >>>> >> + NULL >>>> >> +}; >>>> >> + >>>> >> +DT_MACHINE_START(NPCM7XX_DT, "NPCMX50 Chip family") >>>> >> + .atag_offset = 0x100, >>>> >> + .dt_compat = npcm7xx_dt_match, >>>> >> + .l2c_aux_val = NPCM7XX_AUX_VAL, >>>> >> + .l2c_aux_mask = ~NPCM7XX_AUX_VAL, >>>> >> +MACHINE_END >>>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-npcm/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-npcm/platsmp.c >>>> >> new file mode 100644 >>>> >> index 000000000000..450e83c3c531 >>>> >> --- /dev/null >>>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-npcm/platsmp.c >>>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ >>>> >> +/* >>>> >> + * Copyright 2017 Google, Inc. >>>> >> + * >>>> >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify >>>> >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as >>>> >> + * published by the Free Software Foundation. >>>> >> + */ >>>> >> + >>>> >> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "PLATSMP: " fmt >>>> > >>>> > Maybe something more descriptive? >>>> > >>>> >> + >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> +#include >>>> >> + >>>> >> +#define NPCM7XX_SCRPAD_REG 0x13c >>>> >> + >>>> >> +extern void npcm7xx_secondary_startup(void); >>>> >> + >>>> >> +static int npcm7xx_smp_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, >>>> >> + struct task_struct *idle) >>>> >> +{ >>>> >> + struct device_node *gcr_np; >>>> >> + void __iomem *gcr_base; >>>> >> + int ret = 0; >>>> >> + >>>> >> + gcr_np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "nuvoton,npcm750-gcr"); >>>> >> + if (!gcr_np) { >>>> >> + pr_err("no gcr device node\n"); >>>> >> + ret = -EFAULT; >>>> > >>>> > EFAULT is used for bad userspace addresses, it should not be used for >>>> > other stuff - and a missing node is certainly not a "Bad address". >>>> > >>>> >> + goto out; >>>> >> + } >>>> >> + gcr_base = of_iomap(gcr_np, 0); >>>> >> + if (!gcr_base) { >>>> >> + pr_err("could not iomap gcr at: 0x%p\n", gcr_base); >>>> >> + ret = -EFAULT; >>>> > >>>> > This is more -ENOMEM. >>>> > >>>> >> + goto out; >>>> >> + } >>>> >> + >>>> >> + /* give boot ROM kernel start address. */ >>>> >> + iowrite32(__pa_symbol(npcm7xx_secondary_startup), gcr_base + >>>> >> + NPCM7XX_SCRPAD_REG); >>>> >> + /* make sure npcm7xx_secondary_startup is seen by all observers. */ >>>> >> + smp_wmb(); >>>> > >>>> > I think you mean "make sure the previous write is seen by all observers". >>>> > However, doesn't "dsb_sev()" already do that? >>>> > >>>> >> + dsb_sev(); >>>> >> + /* make sure write buffer is drained */ >>>> >> + mb(); >>>> > >>>> > This looks over the top. >>>> > >>>> >> + >>>> >> + iounmap(gcr_base); >>>> >> +out: >>>> >> + return ret; >>>> >> +} >>>> >> + >>>> >> +static void __init npcm7xx_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) >>>> >> +{ >>>> >> + struct device_node *scu_np; >>>> >> + void __iomem *scu_base; >>>> >> + >>>> >> + scu_np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,cortex-a9-scu"); >>>> >> + if (!scu_np) { >>>> >> + pr_err("no scu device node\n"); >>>> >> + return; >>>> >> + } >>>> >> + scu_base = of_iomap(scu_np, 0); >>>> >> + if (!scu_base) { >>>> >> + pr_err("could not iomap scu at: 0x%p\n", scu_base); >>>> >> + return; >>>> >> + } >>>> >> + >>>> >> + scu_enable(scu_base); >>>> >> + >>>> >> + iounmap(scu_base); >>>> >> +} >>>> >> + >>>> >> +static struct smp_operations npcm7xx_smp_ops __initdata = { >>>> >> + .smp_prepare_cpus = npcm7xx_smp_prepare_cpus, >>>> >> + .smp_boot_secondary = npcm7xx_smp_boot_secondary, >>>> >> +}; >>>> >> + >>>> >> +CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(npcm7xx_smp, "nuvoton,npcm7xx-smp", &npcm7xx_smp_ops); >>>> >> -- >>>> >> 2.15.0.rc0.271.g36b669edcc-goog >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ >>>> > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up >>>> > According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up >>> >>> -- >>> RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ >>> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up >>> According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up >> >> Thanks, >> >> Tomer Thanks From 1583094544282387495@xxx Sat Nov 04 00:50:07 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1581728334594032148 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread