Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 08 Nov 2017 14:16:25 -0600
Message-ID: <20171108141625.Horde.KGzDIfS83FFw-l2cUJ_EO95@gator4166.hostgator.com>
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc:     Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@broadcom.com>,
        Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@broadcom.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
        Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com>,
        linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] IB/ocrdma_hw: remove unnecessary code in
 ocrdma_mbx_dealloc_lkey
References: <20171107083022.Horde.E7wKXkvErbmdKSHiwomsj7N@gator4166.hostgator.com>
 <20171107144517.GA25631@embeddedor.com>
 <20171107145018.GJ18825@mtr-leonro.local>
 <20171107085637.Horde.qFzN3uJQkHeQUTyEgZzV4mv@gator4166.hostgator.com>
 <20171107162804.GM18825@mtr-leonro.local>
In-Reply-To: <20171107162804.GM18825@mtr-leonro.local>
User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


Quoting Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>:

> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 08:56:37AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>
>> Quoting Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>:
>>
>> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 08:45:17AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> > > Check on return value and goto label mbx_err are unnecessary.
>> > >
>> > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1268780
>> > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
>> > > Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com>
>> > > ---
>> > > Changes in v2:
>> > >  Remove assignment from "int status = -ENOMEM" as suggested by Leon
>> > > Romanovsky.
>> > >
>> > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/ocrdma/ocrdma_hw.c | 6 ++----
>> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > Please use git send-email to send patches and not reply to the  
>> conversation.
>> >
>>
>> I'm using mutt.
>> What would be the advantage of using git send-email in this case?
>
> New mail headers, so it won't appear as Reply-To and will be presented
> correctly in mutt's threaded mode.
>

Oh I actually did that on purpose.

So the preferred way to do this is to send the vN of the patch as a  
reply to the first patch?
or as a new thread?

Thanks
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva


From 1583459684963342788@xxx Wed Nov 08 01:33:52 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1583327717666520187
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread