Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753612AbYAPMAV (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:00:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752137AbYAPMAH (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:00:07 -0500 Received: from smtp.ustc.edu.cn ([202.38.64.16]:51274 "HELO ustc.edu.cn" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751866AbYAPMAF (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:00:05 -0500 Message-ID: <400484811.11914@ustc.edu.cn> X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:00:04 +0800 From: Fengguang Wu To: Martin Knoblauch Cc: Mike Snitzer , Peter Zijlstra , jplatte@naasa.net, Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: regression: 100% io-wait with 2.6.24-rcX References: <76258.29672.qm@web32604.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <76258.29672.qm@web32604.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 53D2 DDCE AB5C 8DC6 188B 1CB1 F766 DA34 8D8B 1C6D User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3802 Lines: 106 On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:26:41AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > For those interested in using your writeback improvements in > > production sooner rather than later (primarily with ext3); what > > recommendations do you have? Just heavily test our own 2.6.24 + your > > evolving "close, but not ready for merge" -mm writeback patchset? > > > Hi Fengguang, Mike, > > I can add myself to Mikes question. It would be good to know a "roadmap" for the writeback changes. Testing 2.6.24-rcX so far has been showing quite nice improvement of the overall writeback situation and it would be sad to see this [partially] gone in 2.6.24-final. Linus apparently already has reverted "...2250b". I will definitely repeat my tests with -rc8. and report. Thank you, Martin. Can you help test this patch on 2.6.24-rc7? Maybe we can push it to 2.6.24 after your testing. Fengguang --- fs/fs-writeback.c | 17 +++++++++++++++-- include/linux/writeback.h | 1 + mm/page-writeback.c | 9 ++++++--- 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- linux.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c +++ linux/fs/fs-writeback.c @@ -284,7 +284,16 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode, * soon as the queue becomes uncongested. */ inode->i_state |= I_DIRTY_PAGES; - requeue_io(inode); + if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) + /* + * slice used up: queue for next turn + */ + requeue_io(inode); + else + /* + * somehow blocked: retry later + */ + redirty_tail(inode); } else { /* * Otherwise fully redirty the inode so that @@ -479,8 +488,12 @@ sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, s iput(inode); cond_resched(); spin_lock(&inode_lock); - if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) + if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0) { + wbc->more_io = 1; break; + } + if (!list_empty(&sb->s_more_io)) + wbc->more_io = 1; } return; /* Leave any unwritten inodes on s_io */ } --- linux.orig/include/linux/writeback.h +++ linux/include/linux/writeback.h @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct writeback_control { unsigned for_reclaim:1; /* Invoked from the page allocator */ unsigned for_writepages:1; /* This is a writepages() call */ unsigned range_cyclic:1; /* range_start is cyclic */ + unsigned more_io:1; /* more io to be dispatched */ }; /* --- linux.orig/mm/page-writeback.c +++ linux/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -558,6 +558,7 @@ static void background_writeout(unsigned global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) < background_thresh && min_pages <= 0) break; + wbc.more_io = 0; wbc.encountered_congestion = 0; wbc.nr_to_write = MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES; wbc.pages_skipped = 0; @@ -565,8 +566,9 @@ static void background_writeout(unsigned min_pages -= MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES - wbc.nr_to_write; if (wbc.nr_to_write > 0 || wbc.pages_skipped > 0) { /* Wrote less than expected */ - congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10); - if (!wbc.encountered_congestion) + if (wbc.encountered_congestion || wbc.more_io) + congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10); + else break; } } @@ -631,11 +633,12 @@ static void wb_kupdate(unsigned long arg global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) + (inodes_stat.nr_inodes - inodes_stat.nr_unused); while (nr_to_write > 0) { + wbc.more_io = 0; wbc.encountered_congestion = 0; wbc.nr_to_write = MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES; writeback_inodes(&wbc); if (wbc.nr_to_write > 0) { - if (wbc.encountered_congestion) + if (wbc.encountered_congestion || wbc.more_io) congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10); else break; /* All the old data is written */ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/