Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 69CEAC058ED2
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
        Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
        Kingdom.
        Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
From:   David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1509130095.3716.13.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <1509130095.3716.13.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <150842463163.7923.11081723749106843698.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <150842465546.7923.6762214527898273559.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
To:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     dhowells@redhat.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
        matthew.garrett@nebula.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jforbes@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/27] Enforce module signatures if the kernel is locked down
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2017 17:00:34 +0000
Message-ID: <3565.1509382834@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> This kernel_is_locked_down() check is being called for both the
> original and new module_load syscalls.  We need to be able
> differentiate them.  This is fine for the original syscall, but for
> the new syscall we would need an additional IMA check -
> !is_ima_appraise_enabled().

IMA can only be used with finit_module()?

David

From 1582437665954608591@xxx Fri Oct 27 18:49:19 +0000 2017
X-GM-THRID: 1581705993536835286
X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums