Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp3000307wrb; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:11:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbXVdtzpcVTH6kVpzA1zTDa/AtGiiLlu3+vyW3obmgi45R7szV8fowJ1MeX775MzSBsIjXD X-Received: by 10.84.179.194 with SMTP id b60mr8345850plc.275.1510560709097; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:11:49 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1510560709; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yyt7Pvp2Wo+UMBOanZUM+6Q1lfmKXZ9uDq65t1SdAoZbfkeBITZ+7wcElfFsbWvFVM UQlM8JoeOD+2IeYTcY5js9bz9RrvXDbSifiZkw5uLNBIz8kuWq8dwy6rfe9WQHqHVcBw NpLI8sNxak/gVjiQWF3X2XQqF57HPU8RqfOfEF51lVBJYStKj9y8gyLS2B1LTV4La6dJ fCJwA+wnYqcs9ht+19MhcjFm6UBygLfqq8tvW8qevx5cA82H0HDMhzHXRIT6AtuJrdh/ v7gzl9HqFqQMmQO8BWUlcqpGIYNifz0igFkXFplNQMg1fTziORpLrxMlJB62ixTnJlN6 AIdw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=w58+31A2KdQi+/20Eya+n+YDBo3aBVF3doMf2dSoFSo=; b=WwnrbxJqst4h274J5SRMJ4+w2G/R9Xq+6tJy/I7ig6Y60o5GOVMdEXj/udKNVGAbP7 BBkutcX/cicdtSXfNlm0LYaM+Nug+DCX48kn1h4pMXlMDiUpF3FIksXQOlZ7ThsBGntl a0ODAiItdm8mIMStTisvqzDYosaLhsltTut2g0W4OKt8r5Qc9g79Q2E3RVR14s3zj0ux AT0QdnYytLoHXKjF0EDa1ifc+zlgBJKuBg1mQWGwNDJ9WY+a/Sp2C/P3qvdTcu+hxYKt fh6FveFoybLYob8A2Gge/LWfaYalwSZH8l5xgab0CrG1za/W2d/gx+SKIkG6Rr7BhijQ Z1vA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t74si2800794pgc.229.2017.11.13.00.11.35; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:11:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752241AbdKMIJ7 (ORCPT + 92 others); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 03:09:59 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56148 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751946AbdKMIJ6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 03:09:58 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622FAAAA3; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 08:09:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 09:09:55 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm-current tree Message-ID: <20171113080955.zcdzx2p5kzoa4d7s@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20171113164206.187a790d@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171113164206.187a790d@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning: > > In file included from include/linux/mmzone.h:17:0, > from include/linux/mempolicy.h:10, > from mm/mempolicy.c:70: > mm/mempolicy.c: In function 'mpol_to_str': > include/linux/nodemask.h:107:41: warning: the address of 'nodes' will always evaluate as 'true' [-Waddress] > #define nodemask_pr_args(maskp) (maskp) ? MAX_NUMNODES : 0, (maskp) ? (maskp)->bits : NULL > ^ > mm/mempolicy.c:2817:11: note: in expansion of macro 'nodemask_pr_args' > nodemask_pr_args(&nodes)); > ^ Hmm, this warning is quite surprising to me. Sure in this particular case maskp will always be non-NULL so we always expand to MAX_NUMNODES, maskp->bits which is what we want. But we have other users which may be NULL. Does anybody understan why this warns at all? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs From 1583929171297324573@xxx Mon Nov 13 05:56:09 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1583928351761700407 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread