Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp1188096wrb; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 23:44:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Tpz5P7cPsUJrEvUL71bNZVsrP6FFg/h4nrIJMZTtQtrBFrsVBj+B+rF3S1O4gQIbqk7RWJ X-Received: by 10.101.93.140 with SMTP id f12mr1492409pgt.60.1510127075204; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:44:35 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1510127075; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FTEAQjX3b65/YzemA5Tr0ZxW74pLfavpFgzatlTTlF14soDSOUwrI4ig2HWprL4FZ9 VfvIUniBbTJEXPSKqwyNZqVqyr7eBqmDmRrQlEMN5OpEExJ2TY0TSpPFonbU2cnsnOUH Ry/rcb2uOICsPG9UKfjDoDytZWwPJMECmjxDyKV67TqZhDcPYx5JXGIABXcWSatslkpI RLseq/mKkO66cQNOiUjZ2LVioCraedBTPjmGBompFm3MkfWG4yii7Ns4YW/kcCFPk8G6 ltgezOkNTGby8EgRdOuNCzvpZIrP7L2m5oluBtWELhg/S/bZVAkmBcsWqmco8EmbnZ2O KpAQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:cc:references:to :subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=FnqhG0vJVcLrT401Omg5aRS9OqqEFa5pZteinJOrz+8=; b=Bf6TTH5SwVBRPNbD4vdsmBj1ILn9w4O4Rp771R1KiY9qRigoiiMiPXwmhvTxEE8B3b 8cM4XO7gDBuviUo/V2pc6GTSz0aTBF+aj5s79U4jaIXD29QZlIwiVmk0/LacPLZSwtAZ TsXXr+zcG2PYJCgnNHCwWortJ9UMSNnfvKiCgzjnppYbBsaQgiYFoRiGKvZMA+XL/+6j GR5eAFCaZCAM4p1TRl7LfJXEzEqGCGNFN6/2erfsTOT2MG7ZkE24GA9M9ZLc33VT0Ush azC9uXjgH7bRpwoV9za8/DvGjxQ0CpEmVPksexyPAY0PdDzWZdcZzZpUocSOvNNnlyjk CRYw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k70si3111751pgc.344.2017.11.07.23.44.22; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:44:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752867AbdKHDWh (ORCPT + 90 others); Tue, 7 Nov 2017 22:22:37 -0500 Received: from mail5.windriver.com ([192.103.53.11]:54030 "EHLO mail5.wrs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751712AbdKHDWf (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2017 22:22:35 -0500 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail5.wrs.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id vA83MXJ2026761 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=OK); Tue, 7 Nov 2017 19:22:33 -0800 Received: from [128.224.163.162] (128.224.163.162) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 19:22:32 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: memfd_test.c: fix compilation warning. To: Shuah Khan References: <1509879400-26061-1-git-send-email-Lei.Yang@windriver.com> <6a76f65a-a484-ba72-6cc5-85010666359c@osg.samsung.com> CC: , , Shuah Khan From: lei yang Message-ID: <1591d8a2-fcc4-9560-0be5-b4ddcf7825ec@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 11:22:05 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6a76f65a-a484-ba72-6cc5-85010666359c@osg.samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [128.224.163.162] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I got the same warning even with ubuntu new distro, this patch fixed this issue. $ gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu 6.3.0-12ubuntu2) 6.3.0 20170406 Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. $ make -v GNU Make 4.1 Built for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Copyright (C) 1988-2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. $ uname -a Linux pek-lyang0-u17 4.10.0-38-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 10 13:24:27 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux --------------------- memfd_test.c: In function mfd_assert_grow_write: memfd_test.c:517:19: warning: format %d expects argument of type int, but argument 2 has type size_t {aka long unsigned int} [-Wformat=] printf("malloc(%d) failed: %m\n", mfd_def_size * 8); ^ memfd_test.c: In function mfd_fail_grow_write: memfd_test.c:537:19: warning: format %d expects argument of type int, but argument 2 has type size_t {aka long unsigned int} [-Wformat=] printf("malloc(%d) failed: %m\n", mfd_def_size * 8); Lei On 2017年11月07日 07:46, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 11/05/2017 03:56 AM, Lei Yang wrote: >> Replace '%d' by '%zu' to fix the following compilation warning. >> >> memfd_test.c:517:3: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of >> type ‘int’,but argument 2 has type ‘size_t’ [-Wformat=] >> printf("malloc(%d) failed: %m\n", mfd_def_size * 8); >> ^ >> memfd_test.c: In function ‘mfd_fail_grow_write’: >> memfd_test.c:537:3: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument >> of type ‘int’,but argument 2 has type ‘size_t’ [-Wformat=] >> printf("malloc(%d) failed: %m\n", mfd_def_size * 8); >> >> Signed-off-by: Lei Yang >> --- >> tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c >> index f94c6d1..95df9e6 100644 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c >> @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static void mfd_assert_grow_write(int fd) >> >> buf = malloc(mfd_def_size * 8); >> if (!buf) { >> - printf("malloc(%d) failed: %m\n", mfd_def_size * 8); >> + printf("malloc(%zu) failed: %m\n", mfd_def_size * 8); >> abort(); >> } >> >> @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static void mfd_fail_grow_write(int fd) >> >> buf = malloc(mfd_def_size * 8); >> if (!buf) { >> - printf("malloc(%d) failed: %m\n", mfd_def_size * 8); >> + printf("malloc(%zu) failed: %m\n", mfd_def_size * 8); >> abort(); >> } >> >> > Relates to gcc version perhaps. What's your gcc version? > > thanks, > -- Shuah From 1583367899974527098@xxx Tue Nov 07 01:14:59 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1583223412588596189 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread