Received: by 10.223.164.202 with SMTP id h10csp5568521wrb; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 11:49:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMawk237WcnbVcP6W6zMCtuzoqHu/alGcMOxwGgNCiA3EXe2aR1OubQPK2CvGwWHkVDuc9YC X-Received: by 10.99.169.25 with SMTP id u25mr17744699pge.77.1511293782854; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 11:49:42 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1511293782; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=z/o+RI+fGnPV77XIlbnaEIbrlFvwIDVhMWlHVt9BozlwlsQnof7U7MOFbvA2CUT6Yn 0O3SxG6svLkJnJFoSE4SGgRVD/AoKKBCq28128lMXyfCIU0sHXSChWDRSna8eIvViWv8 9wX5wvoVTiEMSn9PM9/0NVMcAdA4EA2D/PIm43o9uTKqzBAY8GkP6wpTgGvyG9PZsMt9 65RRhVkUwTJg9v4jstzws1NrFG1vCkd1/Jsc7S8s6PFRA7WCVMI87A/8i+2Hn1gq+0Yj 8nvXRNAMQepgft0FnkbZpIyrv/RJ+sdK7yTiLa3tWkU1/otPKDaQS5GjdxWExcpVgmG8 YRHQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=6h8Jxd706yFn/qWbd4Mp8ev0hMKmRczOVDuL2KJJ94Q=; b=HK+9zkxdiMjYBg0ABulKhuDcUX8s9DQNrciGUgckcIEmVcm+/n5dpYTmdS6fbrWYIE ckN0Ugn1ml/B2Q1B1bWO8HxFitsqUrYnhONU2vQ36M801mjGf/lfYgQF6CAipcYYmWKz 27Tez4IEsDDIn2Kd832sX6Tu6PGFaiEO3B2HqvlYruaZmg7yckRAI1sVdYOsQLsQqIoV X3W5pLgbIyqG3AgJcCM7+UQ6pHh6kqrQo8q+OH3Z7qnj69NNihU47hj84WkaIEZM1ZyA tQxXi1Ctp3F6+IENTTNclo78vA3sNNrtOgtg/qxpCaoL0tFmvQZD/DSXOJOf226e5bYg zHgQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=g6IvYUnU; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 3si11776929plm.768.2017.11.21.11.49.31; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 11:49:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=g6IvYUnU; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751359AbdKUTsx (ORCPT + 76 others); Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:48:53 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]:37196 "EHLO mail-io0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750794AbdKUTsv (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:48:51 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f178.google.com with SMTP id v21so20746709ioi.4; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 11:48:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6h8Jxd706yFn/qWbd4Mp8ev0hMKmRczOVDuL2KJJ94Q=; b=g6IvYUnU/qlhqGALZ7/aE1iE0GawSWxbM6WlUA0LTZuyusFi8D+zccAlCMZ6wGEZOj vqmv0yGrB5YCPC0XPdWQ0uf5O/6mVZj9cYzZxfeeelNA+X6T+IpeP0twWQeMhMI0ULjq UKiZG+ApWrKFnB6QwoG8RKaNNllwR3b/3wiH3POIlU+z5S61l0fKspjmSsX3aAUiTQPb PqijciI8Mp+2DCgoxcxh5uBu6ydE3KndP3POCzjSVYhebiQbyiUQoZddZjvE2zB7P8OB R5KjKrf5hXc7L6au5XCIJi3FsfBz/hDhhorI14YJLJ05B4jLPS0i181QrCJRhr2Px3Y5 +5HQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6h8Jxd706yFn/qWbd4Mp8ev0hMKmRczOVDuL2KJJ94Q=; b=PBWa+wvztNyKZ3VteNFf2p4VgZFHCh+9OPoGbvVWDlt0wA2De6DqFoxeM/BEon2ISf KIsq1ShEvAJtkpcDLCPqDcP6BL94VnJ5qIXwD3LVfinyXfHR9eARmjV1HR0BL0O4JsCr YLOpOKLIr9ZppKy23MTheYY7M1t9YzOkIvrg2tZGRU5Aw/T2eFHOb1aY9w2fSKi33/nq 4Pvb2KYQDPUwfZlraeqfoWXPPH7Vy1CfpOKjyBre9nlqoVky5mbR2y2j3CgnIugknSJi kg2GdUXE1yHmL2USkLO5mQdwmu2XiTsFCPB3FJmB91lNl3Kitp0iSoTTIsBrolBK0qfU X/aA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6IShk0z1antD6qVJMHkWlsT3wf4OORLOqfNpFk01hFwqTrKEZw 7+eKyZaxcu/O4SZ+RE8BbPlWiv2lw+Ggm1BQFz8= X-Received: by 10.107.183.77 with SMTP id h74mr20775603iof.0.1511293730859; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 11:48:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.76.85 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 11:48:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1511251834.4822.113.camel@oracle.com> References: <716fa938a4ab0ad66490b72e2ed750cd6583728f.1510840787.git-series.knut.omang@oracle.com> <20171120200827.726yhebihjhrhted@ltop.local> <1511212212.4822.66.camel@oracle.com> <20171120212251.k4uvdstfhg6qtrag@ltop.local> <1511251834.4822.113.camel@oracle.com> From: Jim Davis Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:48:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] kbuild: Add P= command line flag to run checkpatch To: Knut Omang Cc: Luc Van Oostenryck , Masahiro Yamada , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Michal Marek , Linux Kbuild mailing list , Andy Whitcroft , Joe Perches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Knut Omang wrote: > Would you like to keep the checkpatch changes in some form, or would you rather > see everything happening in the wrapper? I don't have a strong preference one way or another, but keeping everything in a wrapper script might be easier if only because you wouldn't need to get signoffs from whoever maintains checkpatch too. -- Jim From 1584662478175449474@xxx Tue Nov 21 08:11:45 +0000 2017 X-GM-THRID: 1584259521491508959 X-Gmail-Labels: Inbox,Category Forums,HistoricalUnread