Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755263AbYAQGig (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:38:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751778AbYAQGi0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:38:26 -0500 Received: from imsa.nihilent.com ([203.124.131.74]:45239 "EHLO imsa.nihilent.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751033AbYAQGi0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:38:26 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Subject: RE: Bitops source problem Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:08:19 +0530 Message-ID: <1145971D427D7F43B0DBDAE22221C4B502CCE22D@nipns00a210.FPS.NIHILENT.COM> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Bitops source problem Thread-Index: AchYzI8QM7KoW+7+QrWLm0hE2kWh1gABoAVA From: "Pravin Nanaware" To: "John Hubbard" Cc: "LKML" X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.1191-5.0.0.1023-15672.002 X-TM-AS-Result: No--20.215-7.0-31-1 X-imss-scan-details: No--20.215-7.0-31-1;No--20.215-7.0-31-1 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No;No Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2412 Lines: 72 Thanks for the reply John. Then, I think there is a problem with the function written below which is meant to be atomic. static __inline__ void change_bit(int nr, volatile void * addr) { __asm__ __volatile__( "btcl %1,%0" :"=m" (ADDR) :"Ir" (nr)); } Regards, Pravin -----Original Message----- From: John Hubbard [mailto:john.hubbard@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 11:17 AM To: Pravin Nanaware Cc: LKML Subject: Re: Bitops source problem Pravin Nanaware wrote: > Hi, > > I was just going through the include file in the /usr/include/asm/bitops.h > > The function description describes it as non-atomic but it seems it is not. > > static __inline__ void __change_bit(int nr, volatile void * addr) > { > __asm__ __volatile__( > "btcl %1,%0" > :"=m" (ADDR) > :"Ir" (nr)); > } > > The kernel version I am using is 2.6.9-42. Is it right or am I missing something ? > > Thanks, > Pravin > The bitops.h comments are correct: the btc IA-32 instruction is only atomic if used with the lock prefix. The function above does not use the lock prefix, so it is not atomic. thanks, John Hubbard -**************Nihilent*************** " *** All information contained in this communication is confidential, proprietary, privileged and is intended for the addressees only. If youhave received this E-mail in error please notify mail administrator by telephone on +91-20-39846100 or E-mail the sender by replying to this message, and then delete this E-mail and other copies of it from your computer system. Any unauthorized dissemination,publication, transfer or use of the contents of this communication, with or without modifications is punishable under the relevant law. Nihilent has scanned this mail with current virus checking technologies. However, Nihilent makes no representations or warranties to the effect that this communication is virus-free. Nihilent reserves the right to monitor all E-mail communications through its Corporate Network. *** " *************************************************************************- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/