Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:35:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:34:53 -0500 Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:40716 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:34:50 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:33:55 +0100 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: Rik van Riel Cc: harald.holzer@eunet.at, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wookie@osdl.org, velco@fadata.bg Subject: Re: i686 SMP systems with more then 12 GB ram with 2.4.x kernel ? Message-Id: <20020103153355.612bd269.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <1010015450.15492.19.camel@hh2.hhhome.at> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:28:45 -0200 (BRST) Rik van Riel wrote: > Another item to look into is removing the page cache hash table > and replacing it by a radix tree or hash trie, in the hopes of > improving scalability while at the same time saving some space. Ah, didn't we see such a patch lately in LKML? If I remember correct I saw some comparison charts too and some people testing it were happy with it. Just searched through the list: 24. dec :-) by Momchil Velikov Can someone with big mem have a look at the saving? How about 18-pre? Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/