Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:50:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:50:16 -0500 Received: from gherkin.frus.com ([192.158.254.49]:2176 "HELO gherkin.frus.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:50:06 -0500 Message-Id: From: rct@gherkin.frus.com (Bob_Tracy) Subject: weird application breakage in 2.5.2-pre5 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 08:49:49 -0600 (CST) CC: axboe@kernel.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The application is elm2.4.ME+.82 with PGP 6.5.8. Works fine under kernel version 2.4.17. Under 2.5.2-pre5, when I try to encrypt+sign a message to a particular recipient for which I have two matching keys on my pgp keyring, no matching pgp key is found. The *only* difference between "works" and "doesn't" is the kernel version. Cranked up the debug level on elm in an attempt to see what's happening, and at level 41, I notice that the parent (elm) isn't reading anything from the child (pgp -kv recipient_address). No error indication of any kind, so fork(), pipe(), execl(), fdopen(), and fgets() all seem to be happy. libc version is 2.2.3. Possible side-effect of bio changes? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Bob Tracy WTO + WIPO = DMCA? http://www.anti-dmca.org rct@frus.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/