Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-117151-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Message-ID: <42ffcfb8-33fd-4ea5-bfac-fa8c78cd1cd4@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:33:27 +0100
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] thermal: More separation between the core and
 drivers
Content-Language: en-US
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
 Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
 Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com>,
 Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
References: <2331888.ElGaqSPkdT@kreacher>
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <2331888.ElGaqSPkdT@kreacher>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


Hi Rafael,

thank you for this series.

It has been reported a regression with commit cf3986f8c01d3. I'm 
investigating and confirming it. If it is the case a revert may impact 
this series.


On 25/03/2024 14:10, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> This is an update of
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/4558384.LvFx2qVVIh@kreacher/
> 
> which is a resend of the series with one extra patch added.  That extra patch
> is related to
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20240306085428.88011-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org/
> 
> The original description of the first two patches still applies:
> 
>> Patch [1/2] is based on the observation that the threshold field in struct
>> thermal_trip really should be core-internal and to make that happen it
>> introduces a wrapper structure around struct thermal_trip for internal
>> use in the core.
>>
>> Patch [2/2] moves the definition of the new structure and the struct
>> thermal_zone_device one to a local header file in the core to enforce
>> more separation between the core and drivers.
>>
>> The patches are not expected to introduce any observable differences in
>> behavior, so please let me know if you see any of that.
> 

-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog