Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-117165-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:41:45 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@linux.dev>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] software node: Implement device_get_match_data fwnode
 callback
Message-ID: <ZgF_GRPHcdiDyxvX@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <Zfq85f-Dp1S3CKuG@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <9ced20e0-dfbd-4337-b5df-223b7baffd9e@linux.dev>
 <ZftG6Q5AaG71dhWq@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <9644da91-f367-4083-a3e4-4d0677c8cbca@linux.dev>
 <Zf2uUwcMgIpo6rVh@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <6bf102a4-6419-4083-8918-4f7c76cfa9a1@linux.dev>
 <Zf3IWyrW8IZLTg4x@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <8afe3f27-fc8e-4c20-ba28-74a0a2937e55@linux.dev>
 <Zf3LBvJEJF9xr2fv@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <839a7448-b958-402e-862a-fc3f7d86e797@linux.dev>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <839a7448-b958-402e-862a-fc3f7d86e797@linux.dev>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 02:30:08AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> On 2024/3/23 02:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 02:12:14AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> > > On 2024/3/23 02:05, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > >    Besides that, the kernel project rule is "we do not add
> > > > the dead (unused) code".
> > > This rule is good an correct and I admit.
> > > 
> > > But the problem is that it is chicken-and-egg problem,
> > > it probably have at least two user now.
> > Then show them! Convert in the same series and show that.
> 
> I believe that Vladimir has show enough to you. I have read that thread,
> I think Vladimit have explained very well.

Let's continue there. I replied there just now.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko