Received: by 2002:ab2:6857:0:b0:1ef:ffd0:ce49 with SMTP id l23csp2842358lqp; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:43:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCU8ldGqDEzaueNapPvhBXjoqQsr2cqk8XoJzjnV7BFLI+xMEKdVly/5crFCEok9UQObxyzY9muy7CVwYHxTJptTXPHzXzL7W82EIiJD3Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHcOTOKdKmPEzowbk+jdlb4f9Kf5CrW64v31lUKT9DUTQxsAFOh5eQea2NLofs+GW1VHxOK X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:944:b0:a46:f538:4009 with SMTP id j4-20020a170906094400b00a46f5384009mr4933241ejd.66.1711388585568; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:43:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1711388585; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MgHaRjP5DLdyIUkBYdhWJJMuHeFSii7+uh9JqN+UC8B1UuiCserHi48HQKtCXD7k8R Y2Y2Fn1+zAMlVDXpXjRtHppjwV0Qvde/93yQrAZSQwD01QCi2Q/dfZoZSVCBj8sp2lle ZQLl6wlMjdn3Swi8dpZimvPQgskgvzU/kRDSW7D4V9aXfw/TbK15olTx4CniWPa43YJq 6AtLZ7w0xcYr3VIVR7WTDNt5tj7M4Nn+ypPdTq1b+KVQ1A8Es/kMEdQ5cpRRRI8jwlIK imxXUq6Lrso631nJLifa3GusXT72vtqE0yQsdp/VWViamwa8CCelHO+ykaEJT/V7a8cY FG7A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=vQDF2SDTd4V6IlnIOxTmsOjY1nuIqh4FOvtswWJxXlw=; fh=OkxN8Did5bL9rNsknR6iMwheUWhIkGuBcMo5KEOqCws=; b=EyLt5s7iYFbQSKOFWMpOHWGlsEq5covksYsDiKonNmJoJdpgs6Ya5LitnaEhQ5SUkj ZdrE9jRK8pZo8oHNs+OxPIMQF/PMFYQ6MhV9WneBMzXlo/gNXhCTyasw2U4TiThtACtN /jMTCgmNr2ylXD7OWUm5tS84RLPLI8L89GHJRB7aJyXNFPf+Yq6BBYFxiOU78qsKJP5U 0bhfNJryaPSka38UOrEX0+CKTceeubkagyJaDp9TLV/C64clmgJVkiJ2GKHUBDvtO4Ne OhWXXxf67WC2gUcfylPv5rmcmfU2jHcNzufFX5Rkcvjy3GMNq3iZdAtZ8/VO3f4sJvHJ Isnw==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=pzELG34j; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=linaro.org dkim=pass dkdomain=linaro.org dmarc=pass fromdomain=linaro.org); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-117506-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-117506-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.80.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id uz12-20020a170907118c00b00a4a399a97e2si810742ejb.726.2024.03.25.10.43.05 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:43:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-117506-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=pzELG34j; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=linaro.org dkim=pass dkdomain=linaro.org dmarc=pass fromdomain=linaro.org); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-117506-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-117506-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E17F81F394BD for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 17:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FB114D6F9; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="pzELG34j" Received: from mail-pf1-f178.google.com (mail-pf1-f178.google.com [209.85.210.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E2A014C596 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 16:46:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.178 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711385221; cv=none; b=BaUK1xpE8dkBUDranYZR7FqKHQrlXkv0+XIUJObH2vYi52K2E60E4O+j8pBwlk5js7J9PhXrzV8+7p33Lg4h+aiS9g43A7wRDHMTxXwjiN/IIPHoSL0UP/LePlgh5bgMvTjWWsEPpBUSgpgozDqNNqHQgwHdagJNnoWLW+S0kUE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711385221; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FqIY1sprUXS/JaBX1u1qozD0GPZzdZxPKznO3xJ5GfI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FtTFBy6hEL8JmZfW7GCLZWXCqbRnVOhFHdryEIRHrNc39rvYAT9fvOtSVCdQADnri3dI67jX2BnfxvKOPrcaXKhKdVW6kxQAjq6tY9w5xql0J+6kM8qRjR+IdNOtUCPVnCgGRsRb73okEOGwAvCPHvNEjNpM6WMr060lbXGm+2s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b=pzELG34j; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.178 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Received: by mail-pf1-f178.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6e74aa08d15so3063637b3a.1 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:46:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1711385217; x=1711990017; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vQDF2SDTd4V6IlnIOxTmsOjY1nuIqh4FOvtswWJxXlw=; b=pzELG34j3rMjDUf7064K8NH3XaJrVPjx1+Ghx8HfNRGl3ozImAplIUfpVi+Oi9gmwP gMUXqiCHE32HvblSElkiTqpFNo6UHlPOSrz5Oc+Rg2TgqthQSZ3tRnkIdsaHlPwKXABy Lz96KgjeEEWnizuX0KHWZVaz8NHciEQqsUdCZXLFzutnA1MzlzqhRuhaZI8oZ3QWY+lA VGG5TXVOIPhFtwaCHDerVbr2VW1s5BRqKhJRHyuSJMGWjxtIKdOI7umGUvEAYw8tg6NA tcZAUn9HbZa68iLv4E0yRmXDAkPtck0UlEqDz9cUA0gXwSq9WdyHYddiCeVjP+/JsKLT W6Vw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711385217; x=1711990017; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=vQDF2SDTd4V6IlnIOxTmsOjY1nuIqh4FOvtswWJxXlw=; b=HFM2fTL+S7KHwp0T9Cvqv6B3vKoDeYmKzT1qzcNoyuNFTtZHVnwaOyOYRe6bcE3wJS yoYEEX9Y3DUVyBUXvaZTsQVzbnpIBNmiBgUgm26PgFihy5o6lXtLnn/5FY1eFeJ9bYux kPNHuz619gSEgFVcFQYGSaQw+s9Td3KcWrUBQtUtHNI1fnCK0+FpYXdpL3dePn0fwE8t 7leMv12Jn5PnPTQgp1qJYknVsFQAcZnvhSuAdGXPpw5dveM8q2PH06uLv2C9GCIUvBxV d2v3Xx2z8R5i0L1B4mk9DwDbSoMKUDhC1kCQpEr6lndpNU9k5bhN8cnCCLK78I3EfOKE z40w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXXfSchmSdB8ugQ9H7Enbu8H0yPENXiR5edTvXhFQHlsu+nLthYtvMYCeBq4NEbT+fH37z0kFqCAhPcW49kSx2ToGrG+ecvazrmEMdS X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzp0eCumt3kbf/JaRLwXwqatRqXCYr6c0R/Ex56rtnhA37FKJWQ W2Ur7TIq1b0iy2Ro2+Pgy9LeR93Bv97zqHc4Ti1y+DVdGoZ4SRUtOiRWjiFMah4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:9393:b0:6e7:3726:ddd2 with SMTP id ka19-20020a056a00939300b006e73726ddd2mr10686921pfb.17.1711385217148; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:46:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p14s ([2604:3d09:148c:c800:4a22:28de:eba3:89d1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k10-20020aa790ca000000b006e6b12d650asm4283467pfk.31.2024.03.25.09.46.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 25 Mar 2024 09:46:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:46:52 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Arnaud Pouliquen Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Jens Wiklander , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] remoteproc: Add TEE support Message-ID: References: <20240308144708.62362-1-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> <20240308144708.62362-2-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240308144708.62362-2-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 03:47:05PM +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: > Add a remoteproc TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) driver > that will be probed by the TEE bus. If the associated Trusted > application is supported on secure part this device offers a client Device or driver? I thought I touched on that before. > interface to load a firmware in the secure part. > This firmware could be authenticated by the secure trusted application. > > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen > --- > Updates from V3: > - rework TEE_REMOTEPROC description in Kconfig > - fix some namings > - add tee_rproc_parse_fw to support rproc_ops::parse_fw > - add proc::tee_interface; > - add rproc struct as parameter of the tee_rproc_register() function > --- > drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 10 + > drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/remoteproc/tee_remoteproc.c | 434 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 4 + > include/linux/tee_remoteproc.h | 112 +++++++ > 5 files changed, 561 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/tee_remoteproc.c > create mode 100644 include/linux/tee_remoteproc.h > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig > index 48845dc8fa85..2cf1431b2b59 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig > @@ -365,6 +365,16 @@ config XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC > > It's safe to say N if not interested in using RPU r5f cores. > > + > +config TEE_REMOTEPROC > + tristate "remoteproc support by a TEE application" s/remoteproc/Remoteproc > + depends on OPTEE > + help > + Support a remote processor with a TEE application. The Trusted > + Execution Context is responsible for loading the trusted firmware > + image and managing the remote processor's lifecycle. > + This can be either built-in or a loadable module. > + > endif # REMOTEPROC > > endmenu > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile > index 91314a9b43ce..fa8daebce277 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RCAR_REMOTEPROC) += rcar_rproc.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC) += st_remoteproc.o > obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o > obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_TEE_REMOTEPROC) += tee_remoteproc.o > obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o > obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o > obj-$(CONFIG_XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC) += xlnx_r5_remoteproc.o > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/tee_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/tee_remoteproc.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..c855210e52e3 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/tee_remoteproc.c > @@ -0,0 +1,434 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > +/* > + * Copyright (C) STMicroelectronics 2024 - All Rights Reserved > + * Author: Arnaud Pouliquen > + */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include "remoteproc_internal.h" > + > +#define MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMBER 4 > + > +/* > + * Authentication of the firmware and load in the remote processor memory > + * > + * [in] params[0].value.a: unique 32bit identifier of the remote processor > + * [in] params[1].memref: buffer containing the image of the buffer > + */ > +#define TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_LOAD_FW 1 > + > +/* > + * Start the remote processor > + * > + * [in] params[0].value.a: unique 32bit identifier of the remote processor > + */ > +#define TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_START_FW 2 > + > +/* > + * Stop the remote processor > + * > + * [in] params[0].value.a: unique 32bit identifier of the remote processor > + */ > +#define TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_STOP_FW 3 > + > +/* > + * Return the address of the resource table, or 0 if not found > + * No check is done to verify that the address returned is accessible by > + * the non secure context. If the resource table is loaded in a protected > + * memory the access by the non secure context will lead to a data abort. > + * > + * [in] params[0].value.a: unique 32bit identifier of the remote processor > + * [out] params[1].value.a: 32bit LSB resource table memory address > + * [out] params[1].value.b: 32bit MSB resource table memory address > + * [out] params[2].value.a: 32bit LSB resource table memory size > + * [out] params[2].value.b: 32bit MSB resource table memory size > + */ > +#define TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_GET_RSC_TABLE 4 > + > +/* > + * Return the address of the core dump > + * > + * [in] params[0].value.a: unique 32bit identifier of the remote processor > + * [out] params[1].memref: address of the core dump image if exist, > + * else return Null > + */ > +#define TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_GET_COREDUMP 5 > + > +struct tee_rproc_context { > + struct list_head sessions; > + struct tee_context *tee_ctx; > + struct device *dev; > +}; > + > +static struct tee_rproc_context *tee_rproc_ctx; > + > +static void tee_rproc_prepare_args(struct tee_rproc *trproc, int cmd, > + struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg *arg, > + struct tee_param *param, > + unsigned int num_params) > +{ > + memset(arg, 0, sizeof(*arg)); > + memset(param, 0, MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMBER * sizeof(*param)); > + > + arg->func = cmd; > + arg->session = trproc->session_id; > + arg->num_params = num_params + 1; > + > + param[0] = (struct tee_param) { > + .attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INPUT, > + .u.value.a = trproc->rproc_id, > + }; > +} > + > +int tee_rproc_load_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > +{ > + struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg; > + struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMBER]; > + struct tee_rproc *trproc = rproc->tee_interface; > + struct tee_shm *fw_shm; > + int ret; Declarations in reverse ascending order here and everywhere in the driver. Sometimes it is done properly, sometimes it isn't. > + > + if (!trproc) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + fw_shm = tee_shm_register_kernel_buf(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx, (void *)fw->data, fw->size); > + if (IS_ERR(fw_shm)) > + return PTR_ERR(fw_shm); > + > + tee_rproc_prepare_args(trproc, TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_LOAD_FW, &arg, param, 1); > + > + /* Provide the address of the firmware image */ > + param[1] = (struct tee_param) { > + .attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INPUT, > + .u.memref = { > + .shm = fw_shm, > + .size = fw->size, > + .shm_offs = 0, > + }, > + }; > + > + ret = tee_client_invoke_func(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx, &arg, param); > + if (ret < 0 || arg.ret != 0) { > + dev_err(tee_rproc_ctx->dev, > + "TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_LOAD_FW invoke failed TEE err: %x, ret:%x\n", > + arg.ret, ret); > + if (!ret) > + ret = -EIO; > + } > + > + tee_shm_free(fw_shm); > + > + return ret; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_rproc_load_fw); > + > +struct resource_table *tee_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, size_t *table_sz) > +{ > + struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg; > + struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMBER]; > + struct tee_rproc *trproc = rproc->tee_interface; > + struct resource_table *rsc_table; > + int ret; > + > + if (!trproc) > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + > + tee_rproc_prepare_args(trproc, TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_GET_RSC_TABLE, &arg, param, 2); > + > + param[1].attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_OUTPUT; > + param[2].attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_OUTPUT; > + > + ret = tee_client_invoke_func(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx, &arg, param); > + if (ret < 0 || arg.ret != 0) { > + dev_err(tee_rproc_ctx->dev, > + "TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_GET_RSC_TABLE invoke failed TEE err: %x, ret:%x\n", > + arg.ret, ret); > + return ERR_PTR(-EIO); > + } > + > + *table_sz = param[2].u.value.a; > + > + /* If the size is null no resource table defined in the image */ > + if (!*table_sz) > + return NULL; > + > + /* Store the resource table address that would be updated by the remote core. */ > + rsc_table = ioremap_wc(param[1].u.value.a, *table_sz); > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rsc_table)) { > + dev_err(tee_rproc_ctx->dev, "Unable to map memory region: %lld+%zx\n", > + param[1].u.value.a, *table_sz); > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > + } > + > + return rsc_table; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table); > + > +int tee_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > +{ > + struct tee_rproc *trproc = rproc->tee_interface; > + struct resource_table *rsc_table; > + size_t table_sz; > + int ret; > + > + ret = tee_rproc_load_fw(rproc, fw); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + rsc_table = tee_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, &table_sz); > + if (IS_ERR(rsc_table)) > + return PTR_ERR(rsc_table); > + > + /* Create a copy of the resource table to have same behaviour than the elf loader. */ > + rproc->cached_table = kmemdup(rsc_table, table_sz, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!rproc->cached_table) > + return -ENOMEM; Why not ->table_ptr and setting ->cached_table to NULL? > + > + rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table; > + rproc->table_sz = table_sz; > + trproc->rsc_table = rsc_table; I really don't see why this is needed, please remove and use rproc->table_ptr instead. > + > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_rproc_parse_fw); > + > +struct resource_table *tee_rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, > + const struct firmware *fw) > +{ > + struct tee_rproc *trproc = rproc->tee_interface; > + struct resource_table *rsc_table; > + size_t table_sz; > + > + if (!trproc) > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + > + /* Check if the resourse table has already been obtained in tee_rproc_parse_fw() */ > + if (trproc->rsc_table) > + return trproc->rsc_table; Again, why not simply use rproc->rsc_table? This function should only return the resource table that was set in tee_rproc_parse_fw(). > + > + rsc_table = tee_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, &table_sz); > + if (IS_ERR(rsc_table)) > + return rsc_table; > + > + rproc->table_sz = table_sz; > + trproc->rsc_table = rsc_table; > + > + return rsc_table; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table); > + > +int tee_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg; > + struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMBER]; > + struct tee_rproc *trproc = rproc->tee_interface; > + int ret; > + > + if (!trproc) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + tee_rproc_prepare_args(trproc, TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_START_FW, &arg, param, 0); > + > + ret = tee_client_invoke_func(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx, &arg, param); > + if (ret < 0 || arg.ret != 0) { > + dev_err(tee_rproc_ctx->dev, > + "TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_START_FW invoke failed TEE err: %x, ret:%x\n", > + arg.ret, ret); > + if (!ret) > + ret = -EIO; > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_rproc_start); > + > +int tee_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg; > + struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMBER]; > + struct tee_rproc *trproc = rproc->tee_interface; > + int ret; > + > + if (!trproc) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + tee_rproc_prepare_args(trproc, TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_STOP_FW, &arg, param, 0); > + > + ret = tee_client_invoke_func(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx, &arg, param); > + if (ret < 0 || arg.ret != 0) { > + dev_err(tee_rproc_ctx->dev, > + "TA_RPROC_FW_CMD_STOP_FW invoke failed TEE err: %x, ret:%x\n", > + arg.ret, ret); > + if (!ret) > + ret = -EIO; > + } > + > + if (!rproc->table_ptr) > + return ret; > + > + iounmap(trproc->rsc_table); > + trproc->rsc_table = NULL; > + rproc->table_ptr = NULL; > + > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_rproc_stop); > + > +static const struct tee_client_device_id stm32_tee_rproc_id_table[] = { > + {UUID_INIT(0x80a4c275, 0x0a47, 0x4905, > + 0x82, 0x85, 0x14, 0x86, 0xa9, 0x77, 0x1a, 0x08)}, > + {} > +}; > + > +struct tee_rproc *tee_rproc_register(struct device *dev, struct rproc *rproc, unsigned int rproc_id) > +{ > + struct tee_client_device *tee_device; > + struct tee_ioctl_open_session_arg sess_arg; > + struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM_ARRY_MEMBER]; > + struct tee_rproc *trproc; > + int ret; > + > + /* > + * Test if the device has been probed by the TEE bus. In case of failure, we ignore the > + * reason. The bus could be not yet probed or the service not available in the secure > + * firmware.The assumption in such a case is that the TEE remoteproc is not probed. > + */ > + if (!tee_rproc_ctx) > + return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER); > + > + trproc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*trproc), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!trproc) > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > + > + tee_device = to_tee_client_device(tee_rproc_ctx->dev); > + memset(&sess_arg, 0, sizeof(sess_arg)); > + > + memcpy(sess_arg.uuid, tee_device->id.uuid.b, TEE_IOCTL_UUID_LEN); > + > + sess_arg.clnt_login = TEE_IOCTL_LOGIN_REE_KERNEL; > + sess_arg.num_params = 1; > + > + param[0] = (struct tee_param) { > + .attr = TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INPUT, > + .u.value.a = rproc_id, > + }; > + > + ret = tee_client_open_session(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx, &sess_arg, param); > + if (ret < 0 || sess_arg.ret != 0) { > + dev_err(dev, "tee_client_open_session failed, err: %x\n", sess_arg.ret); > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + } > + > + trproc->parent = dev; > + trproc->rproc_id = rproc_id; > + trproc->session_id = sess_arg.session; > + > + trproc->rproc = rproc; > + rproc->tee_interface = trproc; > + > + list_add_tail(&trproc->node, &tee_rproc_ctx->sessions); > + > + return trproc; Once this function was called by a client, what prevents a user from unloading the tee_remoteproc module and breaking everything? > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_rproc_register); > + > +int tee_rproc_unregister(struct tee_rproc *trproc) > +{ If you pass a struct_rproc instead of a struct tee_rproc there is no need for tee_rproc::rproc, which is only ever used in this function. > + struct rproc *rproc = trproc->rproc; > + int ret; > + > + ret = tee_client_close_session(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx, trproc->session_id); > + if (ret < 0) > + dev_err(trproc->parent, "tee_client_close_session failed, err: %x\n", ret); > + > + list_del(&trproc->node); > + rproc->tee_interface = NULL; > + > + return ret; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tee_rproc_unregister); > + > +static int tee_rproc_ctx_match(struct tee_ioctl_version_data *ver, const void *data) > +{ > + /* Today we support only the OP-TEE, could be extend to other tees */ > + return (ver->impl_id == TEE_IMPL_ID_OPTEE); > +} > + > +static int tee_rproc_probe(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct tee_context *tee_ctx; > + int ret; > + > + /* Open context with TEE driver */ > + tee_ctx = tee_client_open_context(NULL, tee_rproc_ctx_match, NULL, NULL); > + if (IS_ERR(tee_ctx)) > + return PTR_ERR(tee_ctx); > + > + tee_rproc_ctx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tee_ctx), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!tee_rproc_ctx) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto err; > + } > + > + tee_rproc_ctx->dev = dev; > + tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx = tee_ctx; > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tee_rproc_ctx->sessions); > + > + return 0; > +err: > + tee_client_close_context(tee_ctx); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int tee_rproc_remove(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct tee_rproc *entry, *tmp; > + > + list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &tee_rproc_ctx->sessions, node) { > + tee_client_close_session(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx, entry->session_id); > + list_del(&entry->node); > + if (entry->rsc_table) > + iounmap(entry->rsc_table); > + kfree(entry); > + } > + > + tee_client_close_context(tee_rproc_ctx->tee_ctx); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(tee, stm32_tee_rproc_id_table); > + > +static struct tee_client_driver tee_rproc_fw_driver = { > + .id_table = stm32_tee_rproc_id_table, > + .driver = { > + .name = KBUILD_MODNAME, > + .bus = &tee_bus_type, > + .probe = tee_rproc_probe, > + .remove = tee_rproc_remove, > + }, > +}; > + > +static int __init tee_rproc_fw_mod_init(void) > +{ > + return driver_register(&tee_rproc_fw_driver.driver); > +} > + > +static void __exit tee_rproc_fw_mod_exit(void) > +{ > + driver_unregister(&tee_rproc_fw_driver.driver); > +} > + > +module_init(tee_rproc_fw_mod_init); > +module_exit(tee_rproc_fw_mod_exit); > + > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION(" TEE remote processor control driver"); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > index b4795698d8c2..8b678009e481 100644 > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h > @@ -503,6 +503,8 @@ enum rproc_features { > RPROC_MAX_FEATURES, > }; > > +struct tee_rproc; > + > /** > * struct rproc - represents a physical remote processor device > * @node: list node of this rproc object > @@ -545,6 +547,7 @@ enum rproc_features { > * @cdev: character device of the rproc > * @cdev_put_on_release: flag to indicate if remoteproc should be shutdown on @char_dev release > * @features: indicate remoteproc features > + * @tee_interface: pointer to the remoteproc tee context > */ > struct rproc { > struct list_head node; > @@ -586,6 +589,7 @@ struct rproc { > struct cdev cdev; > bool cdev_put_on_release; > DECLARE_BITMAP(features, RPROC_MAX_FEATURES); > + struct tee_rproc *tee_interface; > }; > > /** > diff --git a/include/linux/tee_remoteproc.h b/include/linux/tee_remoteproc.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..571e47190d02 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/linux/tee_remoteproc.h > @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > +/* > + * Copyright(c) 2024 STMicroelectronics - All Rights Reserved > + */ > + > +#ifndef TEE_REMOTEPROC_H > +#define TEE_REMOTEPROC_H > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +struct rproc; > + > +/** > + * struct tee_rproc - TEE remoteproc structure > + * @node: Reference in list > + * @rproc: Remoteproc reference > + * @parent: Parent device > + * @rproc_id: Identifier of the target firmware > + * @session_id: TEE session identifier > + * @rsc_table: Resource table virtual address. > + */ > +struct tee_rproc { > + struct list_head node; > + struct rproc *rproc; > + struct device *parent; > + u32 rproc_id; > + u32 session_id; > + struct resource_table *rsc_table; > +}; > + > +#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_TEE_REMOTEPROC) > + > +struct tee_rproc *tee_rproc_register(struct device *dev, struct rproc *rproc, > + unsigned int rproc_id); > +int tee_rproc_unregister(struct tee_rproc *trproc); > +int tee_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); > +int tee_rproc_load_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw); > +struct resource_table *tee_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, size_t *table_sz); > +struct resource_table *tee_rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, > + const struct firmware *fw); > +int tee_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc); > +int tee_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc); > + > +#else > + > +static inline struct tee_rproc *tee_rproc_register(struct device *dev, struct rproc *rproc, > + unsigned int rproc_id) > +{ > + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); > +} > + > +static int tee_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > +{ > + /* This shouldn't be possible */ > + WARN_ON(1); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static inline int tee_rproc_unregister(struct tee_rproc *trproc) > +{ > + /* This shouldn't be possible */ > + WARN_ON(1); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static inline int tee_rproc_load_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > +{ > + /* This shouldn't be possible */ > + WARN_ON(1); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static inline int tee_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + /* This shouldn't be possible */ > + WARN_ON(1); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static inline int tee_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + /* This shouldn't be possible */ > + WARN_ON(1); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static inline struct resource_table * > +tee_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, size_t *table_sz) > +{ > + /* This shouldn't be possible */ > + WARN_ON(1); > + > + return NULL; > +} > + > +static inline struct resource_table * > +tee_rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > +{ > + /* This shouldn't be possible */ > + WARN_ON(1); > + > + return NULL; > +} > +#endif /* CONFIG_TEE_REMOTEPROC */ > +#endif /* TEE_REMOTEPROC_H */ > -- > 2.25.1 >