Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757993AbYAQWNu (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:13:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754467AbYAQWNl (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:13:41 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:43291 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753042AbYAQWNk (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:13:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:13:00 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andreas Herrmann3 Cc: Venki Pallipadi , ak@muc.de, ebiederm@xmission.com, rdreier@cisco.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@suse.de, airlied@skynet.ie, davej@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arjan@infradead.org, jesse.barnes@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] x86: PAT followup - Incremental changes and bug fixes Message-ID: <20080117221300.GA19977@elte.hu> References: <20080116023955.597433000@intel.com> <20080116185748.GA11244@alberich.amd.com> <20080116203328.GA17869@linux-os.sc.intel.com> <20080117191211.GA12631@alberich.amd.com> <20080117203600.GB27778@elte.hu> <20080117210301.GC12631@alberich.amd.com> <20080117211308.GA7858@elte.hu> <20080117214228.GD12631@alberich.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080117214228.GD12631@alberich.amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 897 Lines: 23 * Andreas Herrmann3 wrote: > > but i have not seen this message in your boot log. Could you boot > > with early_ioremap_debug and send us the dmesg - i'm curious which > > ACPI tables are actively mapped while those devices are initialized. > > Hmm, early_ioremap_debug exists only in ioremap_32.c Have to adapt the > 64-bit version first. > > But wait the 64-bit code contains already debug output for this. See > the boot-logs that I have attached to my previous mails. > (Interestingly the code for 64-bit early_io(re/un)map resides not in > ioremap_64.c but in init_64.c.) yeah, it's not unified yet. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/