Received: by 2002:ab2:6857:0:b0:1ef:ffd0:ce49 with SMTP id l23csp3179845lqp; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 01:40:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCUqaGwRdwLJ0k1CEJHkyASj0LJCI00YGE9CDUE5//+mEax0YcVSeMz/JwEz5i0Rgt2Qn8I58o1QPVBjRmbKf8qQKOvlpQqFXVlldKLENw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFhcLtMZOS9Ck+C2SvzQ2CM6jkUyt8FrEI3rLcTIBYIArVcs69gyN9OUN9uDl/qN2ddwDjM X-Received: by 2002:a50:9f67:0:b0:56b:d973:3a0e with SMTP id b94-20020a509f67000000b0056bd9733a0emr7029692edf.12.1711442426782; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 01:40:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1711442426; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pZuxxLqNErkeflyY56g+ZU8R8shFeuUR32EnP+wi4lNjXtqgy5xV0obMYCNKPUkABW XM66pmUc9W7vQRIeaqXz3zMyCcEWY8w6prAHeGLl35egR97H+dcS2Lc1DBXL9NSGZrZr oYJRfq+wIjaJZkGt2bfjoA5YzeVgi9n4q2uXmY5sDvK25VHj6uxnSFQQkJSjM5rq/AJJ yvg0WlNXpoeidfbpB3X0ziHoA9U8iOicg4oqnRmRsG9ciLcT5QbdKqRuFODYl54EXo58 D3ou2nMoR4c84DXod74DPqEiNXNKdzlDSOojF+wVZ7/jnMtc++5duQT14Bx/7zSWkivv miWA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:date:message-id :dkim-signature; bh=nkOCJRiI1ZAz+I9vckhDTlAHc7dV2Q9WRexZvpmK/f8=; fh=KraTzcCIL7GBbcHfTYqD6vMvAD24lgGmWRtU0aquS8o=; b=sHEYsZrBpLHNpYLqO0VUEyNZQc6hH7GTFBff61Y7usLzn+xMIHKskas5Fg+hCgLb0L 1aHm62XoQzxZKC4caWOI5/OcZ1ODPt40U+M+i2zP0gq5oaZ2OcROl/JP5lkdKEfiI88b +ljeYyTzLdEI5ZKe4COuqyqICsESu/7t5z8LPu5Vgmlv7R6n6oW686Ke0l5Iv+l9Azkv uP6u5VM+qFhnfxejGUA9aVqaRCW7JbSqAzw1qG8ykdxLUyyRkqdg30vr93WhERcdgeiC zedAIu8WVwldo+Mfg3DEOxth/JPVT352DeQLRnmJK+l9tlFICJY6xv39QfUM68GtWCK+ gr+w==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=a2JcxKas; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-118562-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-118562-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c3-20020a509f83000000b0056ba99b13f1si3341221edf.649.2024.03.26.01.40.26 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 26 Mar 2024 01:40:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-118562-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=a2JcxKas; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-118562-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-118562-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47C351F36596 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BF610A19; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="a2JcxKas" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2BC5EEA8 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 08:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711442418; cv=none; b=or/ulhWcCBOQHPRt5oXjZ6j3fPKalEadCWYv2Monab6cYsRNSMIYzt6wj02Afz6JcgrZbRLxeR2mOVu6kj+VFPXIs4kLzMcl1m5G3/Qu6AzMutqfyDXDqAINkefOOPEdwgL8a3uS3XRHWIe+zP/DVp1D8yJ4yxXD67Nx+w+tBD8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711442418; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7Bdvz7LgWpP8b6fXpCGiw0T2Cn2hmF5O8YCyH5UwDHU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=hL+eBe0FNLMGygnbmzPaSGdkMq/H78PikNtMGl9akZ3o3aVVhiOug67hypX8xnNSn11TNVApgEEizNHCjxxiNv3ZTOKtErX1xSTTnUnlMob/9e/18PsVAztmtizosUboTGPLJzmcaZbPgBf0OZ9UGPsi7kp3dUq+psgzneC7KwY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=a2JcxKas; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1711442415; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=nkOCJRiI1ZAz+I9vckhDTlAHc7dV2Q9WRexZvpmK/f8=; b=a2JcxKasBV9la3Pl0aYaVLX5kVicuae92utM7mKeJ75/l1HiiFxZJ6DRRatf9CeKHAdkPU LxmluLl35akQOfWksqUs595snfjq+ZbIfmabvZ2jWa2yWwyEtyPOA0EWdYe2CMZSq1zS65 pP8vqoFGktOo1XrKmycyUdkujqGShY0= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-423-QBG1fBGrPauzArgcPEbbTg-1; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 04:40:14 -0400 X-MC-Unique: QBG1fBGrPauzArgcPEbbTg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4147faf154cso13897805e9.2 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 01:40:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711442413; x=1712047213; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=nkOCJRiI1ZAz+I9vckhDTlAHc7dV2Q9WRexZvpmK/f8=; b=Deu9d3cIQNG5WqwChlEW34E7SIYHh7oq6X/XQKppeloE8F/nBtRfYde0d7QfZR12ld 2NMbMrp9k7x3TZS1RCxokb9hwhtyZmpEawi4CM5kZ+AqCx5vxefuMuD6cqaQdXrnVFtj rLRtRSk60HhBxwFu+e6nunQHEV5tJk4SNWnMrYpTi85+an6glLcRiuZjcUX5qA1Ix+3h IxGKuh065qEClmysNjSbOHUcZHg8M1SAlAmm9LDl7CaxBZhcFE61GnfjXoMu2AbsHTrU ntQqhYMHAp2rVL3hFWsGHKRwDVt6PQ+10OomTTwThGz1Uu0Ja6YOSmxQam9f0ahpZJUp fYLg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YztZ6oLb7DCAjsucI73BvhDQ9KZ5QhzDQsynWps9n2B3DhxsiRc VwG0nu76EsheGQyyRDRE0ne1RtktXR7cTg3n57Y7R4lXSGeu9epD0OzW/05r5LgWkt0o3FRsipv qoB4Ru846+cgj4ROu2eUhUJii5mcTckMdZttOIqGno3apDdoKZ5qJlrdLwdN0Fg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4ec6:b0:414:8c26:161a with SMTP id g6-20020a05600c4ec600b004148c26161amr2546254wmq.33.1711442412809; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 01:40:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4ec6:b0:414:8c26:161a with SMTP id g6-20020a05600c4ec600b004148c26161amr2546229wmq.33.1711442412281; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 01:40:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c741:c700:3db9:94c9:28b0:34f2? (p200300cbc741c7003db994c928b034f2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c741:c700:3db9:94c9:28b0:34f2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t9-20020a05600c198900b0041330d49604sm10942408wmq.45.2024.03.26.01.40.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Mar 2024 01:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9e61e85b-afa8-49fe-a9fb-f17d6ca39903@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:40:10 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] mm: merge folio_is_secretmem() into folio_fast_pin_allowed() Content-Language: en-US To: Mike Rapoport Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Miklos Szeredi , Lorenzo Stoakes , xingwei lee , yue sun References: <20240325134114.257544-1-david@redhat.com> <20240325134114.257544-4-david@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 26.03.24 07:30, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 02:41:14PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> folio_is_secretmem() is currently only used during GUP-fast, and using >> it in wrong context where concurrent truncation might happen, could be >> problematic. >> >> Nowadays, folio_fast_pin_allowed() performs similar checks during >> GUP-fast and contains a lot of careful handling -- READ_ONCE( -- ), sanity Re-reading my stuff ... s/( -- )/() --/ >> checks -- lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled() -- and helpful comments on how >> this handling is safe and correct. >> >> So let's merge folio_is_secretmem() into folio_fast_pin_allowed(), still >> avoiding checking the actual mapping only if really required. s/avoiding// >> >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand > > Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) > Thanks! > A few comments below, no strong feelings about them. > >> --- >> include/linux/secretmem.h | 21 ++------------------- >> mm/gup.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------ >> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/secretmem.h b/include/linux/secretmem.h >> index 6996f1f53f14..e918f96881f5 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/secretmem.h >> +++ b/include/linux/secretmem.h >> @@ -6,25 +6,8 @@ >> >> extern const struct address_space_operations secretmem_aops; >> >> -static inline bool folio_is_secretmem(struct folio *folio) >> +static inline bool secretmem_mapping(struct address_space *mapping) >> { >> - struct address_space *mapping; >> - >> - /* >> - * Using folio_mapping() is quite slow because of the actual call >> - * instruction. >> - * We know that secretmem pages are not compound and LRU so we can >> - * save a couple of cycles here. >> - */ >> - if (folio_test_large(folio) || folio_test_lru(folio)) >> - return false; >> - >> - mapping = (struct address_space *) >> - ((unsigned long)folio->mapping & ~PAGE_MAPPING_FLAGS); >> - >> - if (!mapping || mapping != folio->mapping) >> - return false; >> - >> return mapping->a_ops == &secretmem_aops; >> } >> >> @@ -38,7 +21,7 @@ static inline bool vma_is_secretmem(struct vm_area_struct *vma) >> return false; >> } >> >> -static inline bool folio_is_secretmem(struct folio *folio) >> +static inline bool secretmem_mapping(struct address_space *mapping) >> { >> return false; >> } >> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c >> index e7510b6ce765..69d8bc8e4451 100644 >> --- a/mm/gup.c >> +++ b/mm/gup.c >> @@ -2472,6 +2472,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_user_pages_unlocked); >> * This call assumes the caller has pinned the folio, that the lowest page table >> * level still points to this folio, and that interrupts have been disabled. >> * >> + * GUP-fast must reject all secretmem folios. >> + * >> * Writing to pinned file-backed dirty tracked folios is inherently problematic >> * (see comment describing the writable_file_mapping_allowed() function). We >> * therefore try to avoid the most egregious case of a long-term mapping doing >> @@ -2484,22 +2486,32 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_user_pages_unlocked); >> static bool folio_fast_pin_allowed(struct folio *folio, unsigned int flags) > > Now when this function checks for gup in general, maybe it's worth to > rename it to, say, folio_fast_gup_allowed. Had the exact the same thought, so I'll do it! Not sure about "fast gup" vs. "gup fast" vs. "lockless gup", it's all inconsistent and we should likely clean that up. Likely, we should just prefix all relevant functions with "gup_fast". I'll call this "gup_fast_folio_allowed" for now. The first description of the function becomes: "Used in the GUP-fast path to determine whether GUP is permitted to work on a specific folio." > >> { >> struct address_space *mapping; >> + bool check_secretmem = false; >> + bool reject_file_backed = false; >> unsigned long mapping_flags; >> >> /* >> * If we aren't pinning then no problematic write can occur. A long term >> * pin is the most egregious case so this is the one we disallow. >> */ >> - if ((flags & (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_WRITE)) != >> + if ((flags & (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_WRITE)) == >> (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM | FOLL_WRITE)) >> - return true; >> + reject_file_backed = true; >> + >> + /* We hold a folio reference, so we can safely access folio fields. */ >> >> - /* The folio is pinned, so we can safely access folio fields. */ >> + /* secretmem folios are only order-0 folios and never LRU folios. */ > > Nit: ^ always ack Thanks for the review! -- Cheers, David / dhildenb