Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-118712-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:49:42 +0100
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, robh@kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@google.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org,
	fancer.lancer@gmail.com, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de,
	dlemoal@kernel.org, yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, srk@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] PCI: keystone: Fix pci_ops for AM654x SoC
Message-ID: <ZgKaNrhoReJ0A525@x1-carbon>
References: <20240325053722.1955433-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com>
 <ZgFemQ8gHpB8yMef@ryzen>
 <ea0294d4-85d1-4784-acd7-dd247165f69b@ti.com>
 <ZgF_5fYsI5lOFjOv@ryzen>
 <750df13b-ee2f-4067-a9e0-7fd1ace384cf@ti.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <750df13b-ee2f-4067-a9e0-7fd1ace384cf@ti.com>

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 10:29:10AM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 02:45:09PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > 
> > In fact, if you move this code to ks_pcie_msi_host_init(), instead of
> > ks_pcie_host_init(), you would not need a comment (or a if (!ks_pcie->is_am6)),
> > since ks_pcie_msi_host_init() is only executed by !am654.
> 
> This seems much better :)
> 
> In the current code, the execution is as follows:
> 
> 	ks_pcie_probe()
> 	    dw_pcie_host_init()
> 	        pci_host_probe()
> 	            ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus()
> 
> Moving the contents of ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus() to ks_pcie_msi_host_init()
> will result in:
> 
> 	ks_pcie_probe()
> 	    dw_pcie_host_init()
> 	    	if (pci_msi_enabled())
> 			if (pp->ops->msi_init) {
> 				ret = pp->ops->msi_init(pp);
> 					ks_pcie_msi_host_init()
> 	        pci_host_probe()
> 
> I will update this patch based on your suggestion. If it's alright, may I
> also add your "Suggested-by" tag for the v5 patch? Please let me know.

Fine by me :)


Kind regards,
Niklas