Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759924AbYAQXcT (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:32:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754085AbYAQXcH (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:32:07 -0500 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]:34029 "EHLO mail.wrs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753257AbYAQXcG (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:32:06 -0500 Message-ID: <478FE465.5000606@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:27:33 -0600 From: Jason Wessel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kiszka CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] kgdb:unify x86-kgdb References: <478F66F6.40107@siemens.com> <478F67BF.4090409@windriver.com> <478F6983.5010707@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <478F6983.5010707@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jan 2008 23:27:33.0560 (UTC) FILETIME=[89515380:01C85960] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1988 Lines: 54 Jan Kiszka wrote: > Jason Wessel wrote: > >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >>> diff -up arch/x86/kernel/kgdb_32.c arch/x86/kernel/kgdb_64.c >>> >>> screamed for unification. Here it is. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka >>> >>> --- >>> arch/x86/kernel/Makefile_32 | 2 >>> arch/x86/kernel/Makefile_64 | 2 >>> arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c | 561 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> arch/x86/kernel/kgdb_32.c | 414 -------------------------------- >>> arch/x86/kernel/kgdb_64.c | 495 -------------------------------------- >>> 5 files changed, 563 insertions(+), 911 deletions(-) >>> >>> >> FYI this is already done in the head branch for kgdb which is going into >> the -mm tree. You will see the new patch set in the 2.6.25-rcX series. >> >> There is now a single x86-lite.patch which contains a number of other >> modifications to the core-lite.patch to make use of >> probe_kernel_address() and a new function probe_kernel_write(). Also >> the die hooks for the "no context" memory faults were removed. >> > > Hmm, is this any kind of patch I should have seen in your kernel.org > git? Which branch? > I'll be posting an update to the -mm tree soon. Presently, I have been updating the x86 patch set because the x86 developers provided some insight as to what needed to change to gain adoption into the mainline kernel. See: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jwessel/linux-2.6-kgdb.git;a=shortlog;h=for_x86 Right now the scope is only 8 patches worth. The other archs will be patched in when I move the patches forward against the -mm tree. If you or anyone else would like to help, I'll be happy to forward a copy of the todo list :-) Thanks, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/