Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:28:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:28:42 -0500 Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:50693 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:28:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:27:56 +0100 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: Rik van Riel Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, akpm@zip.com.au, znmeb@aracnet.com, art@lsr.nei.nih.gov, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kswapd etc hogging machine Message-Id: <20020103182756.237453bd.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:51:01 -0200 (BRST) Rik van Riel wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > > 2.4.1x VM code is performing better under light loads but its > > absolutely and completely hopeless under a real paging load. 2.4.17-aa > > is somewhat better interestingly. > > A quick 'make -j bzImage' test I did yesterday got the system > to use near 70% of its CPU time in user mode and 30% in system > mode. This was with 2.4.17-rmap-10b, btw. And what kind of an argument is this? This is an honest question, really. If I do this make I end up around 80-90% in user mode and the rest in system on a standard 2.4.17 SMP box (configured with too less swap btw). ??? Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/