Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-120345-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240324234027.1354210-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20240324234027.1354210-34-sashal@kernel.org>
 <20240325010435.GA23652@lst.de> <ZgFfc2b6VsX_QSu4@sashalap>
 <20240326074029.GB9773@lst.de> <CAPhsuW7FREFLrAnt2iYDRoJG0d=OXm-5vy3OCJ7MOJDp2SE9GQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <a123d813-bdef-202d-2980-fb74c5a715e5@huaweicloud.com>
In-Reply-To: <a123d813-bdef-202d-2980-fb74c5a715e5@huaweicloud.com>
From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:50:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW7SjGBejv11oCrX-njZ_WfyzXFc7x8X0beBRW_D3H1Ysg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 033/238] md: implement ->set_read_only to hook into
 BLKROSET processing
To: Li Nan <linan666@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>, 
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, 
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 6:18=E2=80=AFPM Li Nan <linan666@huaweicloud.com> w=
rote:
>
> =E5=9C=A8 2024/3/26 16:46, Song Liu =E5=86=99=E9=81=93:
> > Hi Li Nan,
> >
> > Could you please look into this (back port 9674f54e41ff to older stable
> > kernels)? If there is no clean back port, I would recommend we not do
> > the back port.
> >
>
> There are some conflicts to back port, which are not related to the
> modification of this patch. If necessary, let me know and I can adapt and
> send it :)

I think it is not necessary to back port this to older kernels with conflic=
ts.
The error case exists theoretically. But we never got a bug report for it.

Thanks,
Song