Received: by 2002:ab2:23c8:0:b0:1f2:fdbc:cb93 with SMTP id a8csp95876lqe; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:52:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCXUytb5ZO3TrRV4gxNKOMhsijQt8uY7bivHEDjYkMIIcSEoAZX/O+aDUIKn165d1Jtk0joOuxrlMjUE8eHoA/HEMhpTm1k7ZqFteB/jyw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHLJUB6pLhT5HbOAbN9DhjVlR0qgwoEPgbzsvfvqIj3+7wnUxkfZvcXevhgpPB+gNQcNrz6 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b305:b0:a47:61ca:575 with SMTP id n5-20020a170906b30500b00a4761ca0575mr2808647ejz.25.1711518765898; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:52:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1711518765; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=og9J1ilrFX3D1X1pqfBpZEBp6IGHvSyxRcrAQDG9fT6NfkWBeHmP96/3swayXSXBjN 7wIgKfQMVsT9AVGlffw8o0R9SMtPt4mBAuRepkddgrnA2h1Le2vhNjlDzsqP/UrEGErX yFkgQMt1YlWR/avxoWz1WiBP6ZhHuAzvrO2NimDRlX0tAIrlGeYIVokgLuWQH6h63dHY Ces0KBiqZimIAjHd8+94pp3SPUooZAqM83xxyJ8+pMJOySNo520F3vHc0UeOzkfg/Yym V2hRPC2XFUcjIN2yfeUfOMGdsx0xrzGW3wej4uCjCOTVX8+v24j+bm3/OP0RoFoqY8nL yo5w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence :user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=3ptDguvO4cJ0VlhOU2SnV5u9ubMtgRtw23WjzItcFFA=; fh=Eip7FIlSvOIdAZGPwJhskLyDvLZH4sm8t2huFHJNK7Y=; b=z+lkCIqgob2X10352Dj8vDao7xYi+YMDJrbE7GMvCh+GK8Wai/5czDQ6n3Yj1TdRkl 8NKMsqQa2sG6VObu5phCnHxajfmiB066J6hxZK5NdOxIujsmtDlbSanKlOy/yMR4VDl2 P0beV3+qGewSCutlIN81kMFF8kmHJfbjh5FP9u0Wb/I38q3VZectkwgcJygM3xtW9hQv F0UZUKQzkilYohkwrtxLy2Pgt/o06d42J4zCldK22A5L4XWKSQSsWtgrvohgurUfRvgU rd0Qz02Kcgk9ftPNHx443NXknjhedbU3qkvoBuGJNuivk0rmOOtjAIZG9icAWgr6OfcU ZrVw==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=PVvSXPPw; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=intel.com dkim=pass dkdomain=intel.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=intel.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-120347-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-120347-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.80.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b7-20020a170906490700b00a47154bd6d9si4285770ejq.431.2024.03.26.22.52.45 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-120347-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=PVvSXPPw; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=intel.com dkim=pass dkdomain=intel.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=intel.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-120347-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-120347-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A55F1F2948C for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 05:52:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467BC1DA20; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 05:52:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="PVvSXPPw" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B7FB1CD18; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 05:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711518754; cv=none; b=M6W2vh4RhE+VPd2lgXnlLI0TzYljxai3wS041Ii7xAWKeMwzCwB2R/1al3kxW3NJaadVeNYux/S2AUUmAP6KoBtJYV3bgDPhxmBVeN4EatoVeeJll0ES3sb1CB7gPgQaC+UOzHlo6m7E9/85TE3/Os96MKx6MP3Kppvm/HGIIIA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711518754; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8I1UH/rkKDL/ZnyryRvPe87zpb54lxeFGn61pTVax28=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hIFw+ak+RNDzwKENSE0ZvQw9AvJaRnV1Bcy0/82poU6npZWfWvabvO1Z/uNOzIexD5SPK5XsxBrFc883jUNHu5/4sEst1v5LxppVGtkZUP8pFZpQHMqQLatedGCSWv4KqnFWPFqc5Bkuxa+TimgIS8co3EBpNbRSHWS8wwOhqeE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=PVvSXPPw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1711518753; x=1743054753; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=8I1UH/rkKDL/ZnyryRvPe87zpb54lxeFGn61pTVax28=; b=PVvSXPPw/cFTaT0ojzTc2v54M27kxVDTPvldsPDOT3Tr+MMtW2r1LYwf aPgNo/QN/JjlftnaFKcamC2JJ1TP0LJ13YJSbs6W9C5TSnyQV8z0grZzh ptCGcaJzgxmngOFbVShP78J7c32iwO3Ylu3UC2GIQf+uNW2z2aE/C4zqk gGp0mGUQ+MQIsb4GPwiA1rGKuvtfCw54+Hbo5hK5rAivn+6MQ2yvtmm18 IagcnaNx/GaVk5w5mcbOgIYseYwna/Fye9kUiDXknBzFyIrrd+EQOzZ6A HZ9flE0wf74k+GDWaV6rcZc3u7oj++hRVr4NuokFAsy83J9racw4eU5bN g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: VbdRz39nT/G/IpAJnLbN1Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: sNOU4J2wSAGQLCeS7E7HrQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11025"; a="6788890" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,157,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="6788890" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Mar 2024 22:52:31 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,157,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="20669703" Received: from yhuang6-desk2.sh.intel.com (HELO yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com) ([10.238.208.55]) by fmviesa005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Mar 2024 22:52:26 -0700 From: "Huang, Ying" To: "Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang" Cc: "Gregory Price" , aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, mhocko@suse.com, tj@kernel.org, john@jagalactic.com, "Eishan Mirakhur" , "Vinicius Tavares Petrucci" , "Ravis OpenSrc" , "Alistair Popple" , "Srinivasulu Thanneeru" , Dan Williams , Vishal Verma , Dave Jiang , Andrew Morton , nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, "Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang" , "Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hao Xiang Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] memory tier: create CPUless memory tiers after obtaining HMAT info In-Reply-To: <20240327041646.3258110-3-horenchuang@bytedance.com> (Ho-Ren Chuang's message of "Wed, 27 Mar 2024 04:16:46 +0000") References: <20240327041646.3258110-1-horenchuang@bytedance.com> <20240327041646.3258110-3-horenchuang@bytedance.com> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:50:32 +0800 Message-ID: <874jcsnryv.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii "Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang" writes: > The current implementation treats emulated memory devices, such as > CXL1.1 type3 memory, as normal DRAM when they are emulated as normal memory > (E820_TYPE_RAM). However, these emulated devices have different > characteristics than traditional DRAM, making it important to > distinguish them. Thus, we modify the tiered memory initialization process > to introduce a delay specifically for CPUless NUMA nodes. This delay > ensures that the memory tier initialization for these nodes is deferred > until HMAT information is obtained during the boot process. Finally, > demotion tables are recalculated at the end. > > * late_initcall(memory_tier_late_init); > Some device drivers may have initialized memory tiers between > `memory_tier_init()` and `memory_tier_late_init()`, potentially bringing > online memory nodes and configuring memory tiers. They should be excluded > in the late init. > > * Handle cases where there is no HMAT when creating memory tiers > There is a scenario where a CPUless node does not provide HMAT information. > If no HMAT is specified, it falls back to using the default DRAM tier. > > * Introduce another new lock `default_dram_perf_lock` for adist calculation > In the current implementation, iterating through CPUlist nodes requires > holding the `memory_tier_lock`. However, `mt_calc_adistance()` will end up > trying to acquire the same lock, leading to a potential deadlock. > Therefore, we propose introducing a standalone `default_dram_perf_lock` to > protect `default_dram_perf_*`. This approach not only avoids deadlock > but also prevents holding a large lock simultaneously. Besides, this patch > slightly shortens the time holding the lock by putting the lock closer to > what it protects as well. > > * Upgrade `set_node_memory_tier` to support additional cases, including > default DRAM, late CPUless, and hot-plugged initializations. > To cover hot-plugged memory nodes, `mt_calc_adistance()` and > `mt_find_alloc_memory_type()` are moved into `set_node_memory_tier()` to > handle cases where memtype is not initialized and where HMAT information is > available. > > * Introduce `default_memory_types` for those memory types that are not > initialized by device drivers. > Because late initialized memory and default DRAM memory need to be managed, > a default memory type is created for storing all memory types that are > not initialized by device drivers and as a fallback. > > * Fix a deadlock bug in `mt_perf_to_adistance` > Because an error path was not handled properly in `mt_perf_to_adistance`, > unlock before returning the error. > > Signed-off-by: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang > Signed-off-by: Hao Xiang > --- > mm/memory-tiers.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c > index 974af10cfdd8..610db9581ba4 100644 > --- a/mm/memory-tiers.c > +++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c > @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ struct node_memory_type_map { > > static DEFINE_MUTEX(memory_tier_lock); > static LIST_HEAD(memory_tiers); > +/* > + * The list is used to store all memory types that are not created > + * by a device driver. > + */ > +static LIST_HEAD(default_memory_types); > static struct node_memory_type_map node_memory_types[MAX_NUMNODES]; > struct memory_dev_type *default_dram_type; > > @@ -108,6 +113,8 @@ static struct demotion_nodes *node_demotion __read_mostly; > > static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(mt_adistance_algorithms); > > +/* The lock is used to protect `default_dram_perf*` info and nid. */ > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(default_dram_perf_lock); > static bool default_dram_perf_error; > static struct access_coordinate default_dram_perf; > static int default_dram_perf_ref_nid = NUMA_NO_NODE; > @@ -505,7 +512,8 @@ static inline void __init_node_memory_type(int node, struct memory_dev_type *mem > static struct memory_tier *set_node_memory_tier(int node) > { > struct memory_tier *memtier; > - struct memory_dev_type *memtype; > + struct memory_dev_type *mtype = default_dram_type; > + int adist = MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM; > pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(node); > > > @@ -514,11 +522,20 @@ static struct memory_tier *set_node_memory_tier(int node) > if (!node_state(node, N_MEMORY)) > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > > - __init_node_memory_type(node, default_dram_type); > + mt_calc_adistance(node, &adist); > + if (node_memory_types[node].memtype == NULL) { > + mtype = mt_find_alloc_memory_type(adist, &default_memory_types); > + if (IS_ERR(mtype)) { > + mtype = default_dram_type; > + pr_info("Failed to allocate a memory type. Fall back.\n"); > + } > + } > > - memtype = node_memory_types[node].memtype; > - node_set(node, memtype->nodes); > - memtier = find_create_memory_tier(memtype); > + __init_node_memory_type(node, mtype); > + > + mtype = node_memory_types[node].memtype; > + node_set(node, mtype->nodes); > + memtier = find_create_memory_tier(mtype); > if (!IS_ERR(memtier)) > rcu_assign_pointer(pgdat->memtier, memtier); > return memtier; > @@ -655,6 +672,34 @@ void mt_put_memory_types(struct list_head *memory_types) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mt_put_memory_types); > > +/* > + * This is invoked via `late_initcall()` to initialize memory tiers for > + * CPU-less memory nodes after driver initialization, which is > + * expected to provide `adistance` algorithms. > + */ > +static int __init memory_tier_late_init(void) > +{ > + int nid; > + > + mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock); > + for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) > + if (!node_state(nid, N_CPU) && > + node_memory_types[nid].memtype == NULL) > + /* > + * Some device drivers may have initialized memory tiers > + * between `memory_tier_init()` and `memory_tier_late_init()`, > + * potentially bringing online memory nodes and > + * configuring memory tiers. Exclude them here. > + */ > + set_node_memory_tier(nid); > + > + establish_demotion_targets(); > + mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock); > + > + return 0; > +} > +late_initcall(memory_tier_late_init); > + > static void dump_hmem_attrs(struct access_coordinate *coord, const char *prefix) > { > pr_info( > @@ -668,7 +713,6 @@ int mt_set_default_dram_perf(int nid, struct access_coordinate *perf, > { > int rc = 0; > > - mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock); > if (default_dram_perf_error) { > rc = -EIO; > goto out; > @@ -680,6 +724,7 @@ int mt_set_default_dram_perf(int nid, struct access_coordinate *perf, > goto out; > } > > + mutex_lock(&default_dram_perf_lock); Why do you move the position of locking? mutex_lock/unlock() will be unbalance for error path above. > if (default_dram_perf_ref_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) { > default_dram_perf = *perf; > default_dram_perf_ref_nid = nid; > @@ -716,23 +761,26 @@ int mt_set_default_dram_perf(int nid, struct access_coordinate *perf, > } > > out: > - mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock); > + mutex_unlock(&default_dram_perf_lock); > return rc; > } > > int mt_perf_to_adistance(struct access_coordinate *perf, int *adist) > { > + int rc = 0; > + > if (default_dram_perf_error) > return -EIO; > > - if (default_dram_perf_ref_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) > - return -ENOENT; > - > if (perf->read_latency + perf->write_latency == 0 || > perf->read_bandwidth + perf->write_bandwidth == 0) > return -EINVAL; > > - mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock); > + mutex_lock(&default_dram_perf_lock); It may be a little better to move lock position at the begin of the function. This will not avoid race condition (not harmful in practice) but it will make code easier to be understood. > + if (default_dram_perf_ref_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) { > + rc = -ENOENT; > + goto out; > + } > /* > * The abstract distance of a memory node is in direct proportion to > * its memory latency (read + write) and inversely proportional to its > @@ -745,8 +793,10 @@ int mt_perf_to_adistance(struct access_coordinate *perf, int *adist) > (default_dram_perf.read_latency + default_dram_perf.write_latency) * > (default_dram_perf.read_bandwidth + default_dram_perf.write_bandwidth) / > (perf->read_bandwidth + perf->write_bandwidth); > - mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock); > + mutex_unlock(&default_dram_perf_lock); > > +out: > + mutex_unlock(&default_dram_perf_lock); > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mt_perf_to_adistance); > @@ -858,7 +908,8 @@ static int __init memory_tier_init(void) > * For now we can have 4 faster memory tiers with smaller adistance > * than default DRAM tier. > */ > - default_dram_type = alloc_memory_type(MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM); > + default_dram_type = mt_find_alloc_memory_type(MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM, > + &default_memory_types); > if (IS_ERR(default_dram_type)) > panic("%s() failed to allocate default DRAM tier\n", __func__); > > @@ -868,6 +919,14 @@ static int __init memory_tier_init(void) > * types assigned. > */ > for_each_node_state(node, N_MEMORY) { > + if (!node_state(node, N_CPU)) > + /* > + * Defer memory tier initialization on CPUless numa nodes. > + * These will be initialized after firmware and devices are > + * initialized. > + */ > + continue; > + > memtier = set_node_memory_tier(node); > if (IS_ERR(memtier)) > /* -- Best Regards, Huang, Ying