Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754158AbYARGgu (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:36:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751192AbYARGgm (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:36:42 -0500 Received: from kuber.nabble.com ([216.139.236.158]:51495 "EHLO kuber.nabble.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751387AbYARGgl (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:36:41 -0500 Message-ID: <14947386.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:36:41 -0800 (PST) From: mokhtar To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Communication between user process and kernel modules MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: mbmessaoud@yahoo.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 606 Lines: 18 Hi What are the different solution to make a user process communicate with a kernel modules? Whatis the the advantages and disadvanteges of each solutions ? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Communication-between-user-process-and-kernel-modules-tp14947386p14947386.html Sent from the linux-kernel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/