Received: by 2002:ab2:6991:0:b0:1f2:fff1:ace7 with SMTP id v17csp89519lqo; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 07:42:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCVnJrfqM0Vp846hLNHlznRUc8Wp+qylPzc3E5eJsXnnDYS9vEqjwpWp4lsRlckFqHjrP62lwx13U+t0t21l33Utlk/iBPGRTO36Ybij0w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH2hWksa/R45qTBAexPV3j/s/n6Vvm14U3wPwkOxBJrtAkYb74MOwQICppIZF/li6oStepH X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1754:b0:431:a515:bb20 with SMTP id l20-20020a05622a175400b00431a515bb20mr91620qtk.28.1711550575445; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 07:42:55 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x5-20020a05622a000500b004312a27b7f3si9854293qtw.89.2024.03.27.07.42.55 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Mar 2024 07:42:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-121361-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Vx8pGiyn; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-121361-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-121361-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E0AB1C2E2AA for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFA213B5AC; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Vx8pGiyn" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4190C13B5A2 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711545903; cv=none; b=nEyqFSXlXpKVSzeUq/xRszeAu1oQDxKX6WtfGJg2xWWYmTSIwxM+6Yh11w+MXsKdjSzALFPVqGAMGZqLNYUxuubLTzwO5Iysok531OEOdDloe/J6J8cfo2oD78hU6RgPlqOG0yfI/T2CsYxJQ4GmogMIyBnqutyzbUoVJ2OlMzw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711545903; c=relaxed/simple; bh=i9F5RVjjdXSXnNca9EoASKUAH+ZHNQI+HhjNJfYHmmk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UpEjd7Wb0d1UbEFH1MqgDTskT7OUQPoOdD0b+N/teb/ym/BT3VaJ0+7pd2H8GGJb/AVSANqe8OeQVTtmC6D790BG2c4twwKQMO3PGY1/aSrskX2o2ZzxsU/2nKitRV3h1cTVx17mgsPr8cTPw3Ah5L7ht+NOEhSrfIxpzbrzUaQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Vx8pGiyn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1711545902; x=1743081902; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=i9F5RVjjdXSXnNca9EoASKUAH+ZHNQI+HhjNJfYHmmk=; b=Vx8pGiynyfInpT8VDE2dyWcfly7nxQWaX/G52yibvADrFBnuJIzdmLqJ uwAZ6tvQpKH2Bq61DbR153Bzz4+568orAk8LN2P+fqwltHrZzzcb1o0se zAsIj+Y12s9I83KWWN5JG5/ApRfzUHPrkUC0MvuQ/YcmFOtUbsdIyDItp Bo+gkNkJ2GDULFBOyfVWkGrnM4/z1M7jK5Jvre5/crN4Z57FRKz/IILi+ xL0+Ig7KaRPXL9EcHjuOYdZuiWivvcUiyGnk8AxhMFCK61T/vN879yACf rhsjxa/RYIUeG1mTS8vZZtSmVMMqpIswCsiTX6+lvmw9/MGdhvIzwmz5l w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Zz9sQcM2S6iNq5oOTZLWZw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: kJdOSVcjSkG/lkGKCUnTEQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11025"; a="6583521" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,158,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="6583521" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Mar 2024 06:25:01 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11025"; a="914913226" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,158,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="914913226" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Mar 2024 06:25:00 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rpTH0-0000000Gdvg-0K2t; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:24:58 +0200 Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:24:57 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Lee Jones Cc: Mateusz K , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mfd: intel-lpss: Switch over to MSI interrupts Message-ID: References: <20240312165905.1764507-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240325211915.GA1449994@bhelgaas> <20240327131711.GR13211@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240327131711.GR13211@google.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 01:17:11PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 26 Mar 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 04:41:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: .. > > Hold on, but IIUC this is the report about new hardware that never had > > a support by Linux before. > > So a revert is no longer required? No, it seems an old issue unrelated to this patch. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko