Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-121382-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:43:40 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Audra Mitchell <audra@redhat.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.8 002/715] workqueue.c: Increase workqueue name length
Message-ID: <2024032733-freebase-dipped-0b4b@gregkh>
References: <20240324223455.1342824-1-sashal@kernel.org>
 <20240324223455.1342824-3-sashal@kernel.org>
 <10844429-b80f-ca9d-bf1d-c42efcc635f6@w6rz.net>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <10844429-b80f-ca9d-bf1d-c42efcc635f6@w6rz.net>

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 02:36:22AM -0700, Ron Economos wrote:
> On 3/24/24 3:23 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > From: Audra Mitchell <audra@redhat.com>
> > 
> > [ Upstream commit 31c89007285d365aa36f71d8fb0701581c770a27 ]
> > 
> > Currently we limit the size of the workqueue name to 24 characters due to
> > commit ecf6881ff349 ("workqueue: make workqueue->name[] fixed len")
> > Increase the size to 32 characters and print a warning in the event
> > the requested name is larger than the limit of 32 characters.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Audra Mitchell <audra@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > Stable-dep-of: 5797b1c18919 ("workqueue: Implement system-wide nr_active enforcement for unbound workqueues")
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >   kernel/workqueue.c | 8 ++++++--
> >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> > index 7b482a26d7419..8a06fddb23e66 100644
> > --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> > +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> > @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ enum {
> >   	RESCUER_NICE_LEVEL	= MIN_NICE,
> >   	HIGHPRI_NICE_LEVEL	= MIN_NICE,
> > -	WQ_NAME_LEN		= 24,
> > +	WQ_NAME_LEN		= 32,
> >   };
> >   /*
> > @@ -4666,6 +4666,7 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue(const char *fmt,
> >   	va_list args;
> >   	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> >   	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
> > +	int len;
> >   	/*
> >   	 * Unbound && max_active == 1 used to imply ordered, which is no longer
> > @@ -4692,9 +4693,12 @@ struct workqueue_struct *alloc_workqueue(const char *fmt,
> >   	}
> >   	va_start(args, max_active);
> > -	vsnprintf(wq->name, sizeof(wq->name), fmt, args);
> > +	len = vsnprintf(wq->name, sizeof(wq->name), fmt, args);
> >   	va_end(args);
> > +	if (len >= WQ_NAME_LEN)
> > +		pr_warn_once("workqueue: name exceeds WQ_NAME_LEN. Truncating to: %s\n", wq->name);
> > +
> >   	max_active = max_active ?: WQ_DFL_ACTIVE;
> >   	max_active = wq_clamp_max_active(max_active, flags, wq->name);
> 
> Minor issue. The upstream commit 8318d6a6362f5903edb4c904a8dd447e59be4ad1
> "workqueue: Shorten events_freezable_power_efficient name" goes with this
> patch. Otherwise the warning "kernel: workqueue: name exceeds WQ_NAME_LEN.
> Truncating to: events_freezable_power_efficien" occurs.
> 
> Same for 6.7.11-rc2 and 6.6.23-rc2.

Now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h