Received: by 2002:ab2:6991:0:b0:1f2:fff1:ace7 with SMTP id v17csp110209lqo; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:12:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCVTmUJJ5oNmG0SGpFe0+RRIIqbfXvUfFVVFX0eG6ZeU+TncEnuqdqmpLzu4G2+RNAHG64du+0H6cMKQ3i4AmccqMRAhSHC8av47QYSGEA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IElN8jjKUAlF9SWzBd32/XPWLLrXOC2mNNarZV5mHFwNPAIeCdG5MXRH5T8bBtKLhlXsu1G X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a00c:b0:a46:da28:992e with SMTP id p12-20020a170906a00c00b00a46da28992emr1206645ejy.71.1711552361963; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:12:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id lb5-20020a170907784500b00a461e0e5539si4767162ejc.456.2024.03.27.08.12.41 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:12:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-121423-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=Zip2nYae; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-121423-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-121423-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B11E31F26322 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09EE1465BD; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Zip2nYae" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0B8914535D for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:23:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711549413; cv=none; b=qdeUgcYH2iEEOUhqTFULIPWD55syW6RPSvRu3b4yiu5G6CUY8lLWDhTw5EtmjQJ3qVUUoEpEmRMy787KOQnvWPe4PYtQoFRfVtMZEAyHHHQmCjlm7smAA1rlmbdVe03renYv0il/eMSHC8bwil1OXpFbJMZjuzHFWeOgNAPsapg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711549413; c=relaxed/simple; bh=978Ys2NHTIo9kyqZglKr1qHAlExbEvvvunWm5NCUUPM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qqG/9ZRPVmrs7JOrB0amC71piAiMokKL/zSpzjlGXFhL9qOH6MoYMusyvyBVjySRNlNO13fBK1YbM4WnGevhG5R4npS9R7E7hv8rbBmdQ8kLBW6VDErfqMDNEo1og1qCCzZVyTs9whgWfQBxAW1NiQbPuf/vYZdeaEpVt7WK+bk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Zip2nYae; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1711549411; x=1743085411; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=978Ys2NHTIo9kyqZglKr1qHAlExbEvvvunWm5NCUUPM=; b=Zip2nYaejpXEOWT9CKj3OF42dWY7Lti70jw2KMrWuPzBkW36oqVyQuJ7 XbCUN+JaaHBBkoAKZ3CRgVLqaDZplI7sgS1SN54FSWYX/3I/+XUiF2trZ ++E0Yi44E77UM4Dses7Y83qSjPb6Mz0b16u5hc+Ld9SgRLlO39T3AMBRg J5USh26T5Ngr/bSf7IzRfpMD60xWnyDQ7u4zAupRBYZsSC60g+az/P5Fz vJSNruwEVF1mtm71gk5i39ankEpfnFsQSiPAT8YwiSSU2afS7UZcDgFnv DxsweivVTLuvl1nYAwwYrE22pJB4iUtsYG54WQ6Cea1tLbYiN5OnrTlbb Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: X0JcHqL7T52fKyhnL0m6gg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gNrCzXBDTVSmSv6mvotsNg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11026"; a="6592562" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,159,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="6592562" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Mar 2024 07:23:30 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11026"; a="914914548" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,159,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="914914548" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Mar 2024 07:23:29 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rpUBb-0000000Geo3-13as; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:23:27 +0200 Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:23:26 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Lee Jones Cc: Mateusz K , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mfd: intel-lpss: Switch over to MSI interrupts Message-ID: References: <20240312165905.1764507-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20240325211915.GA1449994@bhelgaas> <20240327131711.GR13211@google.com> <20240327141229.GS13211@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240327141229.GS13211@google.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 02:12:29PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 27 Mar 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 01:17:11PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 04:41:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: .. > > > > Hold on, but IIUC this is the report about new hardware that never had > > > > a support by Linux before. > > > > > > So a revert is no longer required? > > > > No, it seems an old issue unrelated to this patch. > > Very well, consider it *not* done. :) Thank you! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko