Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-121550-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240309201310.7548-1-W_Armin@gmx.de> <CAJZ5v0hKwThcAO4jMOzi7ySqSv_jHvs_+paBB212qVsaf7LZng@mail.gmail.com>
 <2e8100b0-d87c-413e-bcb1-b91c3ce41633@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <2e8100b0-d87c-413e-bcb1-b91c3ce41633@gmx.de>
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:41:22 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0idAkoiuXgfGYX-a9ZoNeWxw8CjOnTKCU-00BgcpCwisQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI: bus: _OSC fixes
To: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 11:29=E2=80=AFPM Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Am 12.03.24 um 21:10 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 9:13=E2=80=AFPM Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de> wrot=
e:
> >> This patch series fixes the handling of various ACPI features bits
> >> when evaluating _OSC.
> >>
> >> The first three patches fix the reporting of various features supporte=
d
> >> by the kernel, while the fourth patch corrects the feature bit used to
> >> indicate support for the "Generic Initiator Affinity" in SRAT.
> >>
> >> The last patch fixes the reporting of IRQ ResourceSource support. Unli=
ke
> >> the other feature bits, the ACPI specification states that this featur=
e
> >> bit might be used by the ACPI firmware to indicate whether or not it
> >> supports the usage of IRQ ResourceSource:
> >>
> >>          "If not set, the OS may choose to ignore the ResourceSource
> >>           parameter in the extended interrupt descriptor."
> >>
> >> Since the code responsible for parsing IRQ ResourceSource already chec=
ks
> >> if ResourceSource is present, i assumed that we can omit taking this
> >> into account.
> >>
> >> All patches where tested on a Asus Prime B650-Plus and a Dell Inspiron
> >> 3505.
> >>
> >> Armin Wolf (5):
> >>    ACPI: bus: Indicate support for _TFP thru _OSC
> >>    ACPI: bus: Indicate support for more than 16 p-states thru _OSC
> >>    ACPI: bus: Indicate support for the Generic Event Device thru _OSC
> >>    ACPI: Fix Generic Initiator Affinity _OSC bit
> >>    ACPI: bus: Indicate support for IRQ ResourceSource thru _OSC
> >>
> >>   drivers/acpi/bus.c   | 5 +++++
> >>   include/linux/acpi.h | 6 +++++-
> >>   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> --
> > All of that looks reasonable to me, but do you know about systems in
> > the field where any of these patches actually fix functionality?
> >
> > If not, I'd prefer to queue them up for 6.10 as they are likely to
> > change behavior, at least in corner cases.
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> Hi,
>
> i know no system which even queries those feature bits, so i am fine with
> this landing in 6.10.

Now applied as 6.10 material, thanks!