Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-121859-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:53:28 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "Eric Van Hensbergen" <eric.vanhensbergen@linux.dev>
Cc: asmadeus@codewreck.org, "Lizhi Xu" <lizhi.xu@windriver.com>,
 syzbot+7a3d75905ea1a830dbe5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
 linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 linux_oss@crudebyte.com, lucho@ionkov.net, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
 v9fs@lists.linux.dev, regressions@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] fs/9p: fix uaf in in v9fs_stat2inode_dotl
Message-ID: <20240327115328.22c5b5a3@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240322081312.2a8a4908@kernel.org>
References: <00000000000055ecb906105ed669@google.com>
	<20240202121531.2550018-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
	<ZeXGZS1-X8_CYCUz@codewreck.org>
	<20240321182824.6f303e38@kernel.org>
	<ada13e85bf2ceed91052fa20adb02c4815953e26@linux.dev>
	<20240322081312.2a8a4908@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 08:13:12 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:26:07 +0000 Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> > Patch is in the unapplied portion of my for-next tree along with
> > another one.  I was hoping to hear some feedback on the other one
> > before i did a pull request and was torn on whether or not I wait on
> > -rc1 to send since we are so close.  
> 
> My guess would be that quite a few folks use 9p for in-VM kernel
> testing. Real question is how many actually update their work tree
> before -rc1 or even -rc2, given the anticipated merge window code
> instability.. so maybe there's no extreme urgency?
> 
> From netdev's perspective, FWIW, it'd be great if the fix reached
> Linux before Thursday, which is when we will forward our tree again.

Any progress on getting the fix to Linus? I didn't spot it getting
merged.

I'm a bit surprised there aren't more people complaining TBH
I'd have thought any CI setup with KASAN enabled has a good 
chance of hitting this..